ObjectiveTo select the key questions of the reporting quality of acupuncture therapy network meta-analysis. MethodsA question pool about reporting quality of acupuncture therapy network meta-analysis was conducted by preliminary literature research and qualitative systematic review. A correspondence questionnaire was designed and the selection of key questions was carried out through two rounds of expert consultation using the Delphi method. ResultsA total of 21 key questions were selected for the network meta-analysis report standard of acupuncture, including whether to report details of acupuncture interventions (e.g., needle type, acupoints used, number of needles inserted, depth of needle insertion, retention time, needling techniques, and treatment duration), diagnostic criteria for diseases or traditional Chinese medicine syndromes, and qualifications of acupuncture practitioners. Of these, the only three key questions answered by the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and network meta-analysis (PRISMA-NMA) were summary, protocol and registration, and source of funding, while the remaining 19 were specific to acupuncture-related report standards. ConclusionThe conducted key question on reporting guideline of acupuncture network meta-analysis can improve the standardization and rigor of relevant research and better utilize its academic and clinical value.
ObjectiveTo construct the occupational therapy core items oriented by life return for stroke patients, and provide a reliable tool to promote the comprehensive rehabilitation and successful return for stroke patients.MethodsFrom January to February 2020, the primary items were summarized through literature analysis and research group discussion, and then Delphi method was used to determine which items should be included by two rounds of experts consultation.ResultsA total of 22 experts were selected. After two rounds of experts consultation, 60 items in 6 domains were included. The effective recovery rates of the two rounds of experts consultation were both 100%, the mean expert authority coefficient was 0.87±0.54. In the two rounds of experts consultation, the importance scores of consulted items were 7.60±0.97 and 8.06±0.35, respectively; the variation coefficients were 0.14±0.05 and 0.11±0.03, respectively; the Kendall coefficients of concordance were 0.522 (P<0.001) and 0.578 (P<0.001), respectively.ConclusionThrough the Delphi method, the core items oriented by life return are identified with high recognition and consistency from experts, which can be used as a guideline tool for stroke patients in in-hospital occupational therapy, discharge guidance, and community/home rehabilitation.
Objective To construct an index system for the rational use of foods for special medical purposes (FSMP) by medical institutions. Methods Based on the literature review and the survey of 300 medical institutions, we developed a questionnaire for expert consultation and conducted two rounds of expert consultation using Delphi method and consensus meeting method to determine the final index system for the rational use of FSMP in medical institutions. Results After two rounds of expert consultation and expert consensus conference meetings, it was finally determined that medical institutions should reasonably use the FSMP comprehensive evaluation index system, including 3 first-level catalog indicators, 17 second-level catalog indicators, and 13 third-level catalog indicators. Conclusion This index system can help promote the rationalization and standardization of FSMP clinical application in medical institutions in China and improve the quality of clinical nutrition care.
ObjectiveTo build core items of database for traumatic brain injury (TBI) in rehabilitation medical database.MethodsRelevant factors in TBI database were summarized through database search in combination of acknowledged relevant items of TBI in rehabilitation medical database. Delphi method was used for experts to determine which items should be included by two rounds of questionnaires.ResultsThe average authority coefficient of experts was 0.94. After two rounds of questionnaires, 73 were included. Its contents include: general conditions, brain damage and disposal, relevant rehabilitation assessment scales, previous rehabilitation treatment, treatment expenses, and contents that require attention during re-evaluation.ConclusionsAfter two rounds of Delphi evaluation, the core items of database for TBI are identified with high recognition and consistency from experts.
ObjectivesTo use the Delphi method to preliminarily perfect the comprehensive evaluation index system which had been initially constructed by systematic review processes of diabetes food for special medical purposes (FSMP).MethodsThree rounds of expert consultation by Delphi method were compared to define indices held in the evidence-based comprehensive evaluation index system of diabetes FSMP and ways to distinguish effects.ResultsThe preliminary perfect index system after 3 rounds of expert consultation contained 4 primary directory indicators, 15 secondary directory indicators, and 20 tertiary indicators. Among them, the end index which could directly be used for evaluation contained a total of 27 indicators.ConclusionsThe index system is categorized into 4 segments of parameters, which are medical, nutritional, safety and other indices, which has addressed the problem posed by CFDA documents on how to scientifically validate the medical effect and safety of FSMP. It provides great significance to assess and supervise FSMP prior to and after it goes to public, assess characteristics and advantages of MNT, and improves nutrition economy and its social benefits.
Objective To construct a sensitive indicator system for the quality of ambulatory chemotherapy nursing, and provide reference basis for the evaluation and scientific management of ambulatory chemotherapy nursing quality. Method Based on Donabedian’s three-dimensional quality structure model of “structure process result”, through literature review, a preliminary quality indicator system for ambulatory chemotherapy nursing was formulated. The Delphi method was used for two rounds of expert inquiry to determine the sensitive treatment indicator system for ambulatory chemotherapy nursing. The weight of the indicators was calculated using the hierarchical analysis method. Result Fifteen expert inquiry questionnaires were distributed through two rounds of inquiry, and the response rates of the two rounds of expert inquiry questionnaires were all 100%, with expert positivity coefficients of 100% and authority coefficients of 0.90 and 0.94, respectively. The second round of expert inquiry questionnaires Kendall’s coefficient of concordance were between 0.573 and 0.769 (P<0.01). The final constructed quality sensitive indicator system for ambulatory chemotherapy nursing included 3 primary indicators, 8 secondary indicators, and 27 tertiary indicators. The overall Cronbach’s α coefficient for the second round of inquiry questionnaires was 0.853, while the Cronbach’s α coefficients for structural indicators, process indicators, and outcome indicators were 0.879, 0.921, and 0.857, respectively. Conclusions The sensitive indicator system for nursing quality in ambulatory chemotherapy wards constructed has high systematicity, sensitivity, and scientificity, and the weight distribution is reasonable. This indicator system can provide a reference basis for objective evaluation and standardized management of nursing quality in ambulatory chemotherapy.
As an important auxiliary means of pharmacoeconomics evaluation, budget impact analysis can effectively measure the affordability of medical insurance fund, and plays a significant role in the process of medical insurance access negotiation, adjustment of medical insurance reimbursement directory and establishment of payment price. The quality of budget impact analysis data has a great impact on the analysis results and the scientific decision-making. When the existing data cannot meet the requirements of the paper, relevant software is needed to carry out Delphi method to ensure the data accuracy. Infopoll is a powerful, easy-to-use application that designs consultation questionnaires by providing multiple question choices and multiple forms of answer settings, as well as detailed statistical charts for results analysis. This paper introduces how to obtain the data of budget impact analysis based on Delphi method using Infopoll software, and analyzes the main results in detail.
ObjectiveBy establishing a set of evaluation system for thoracoscopic clinical function and applicability, to evaluate and compare the advantages and disadvantages of different brands of thoracoscopes, and to provide some suggestions for the innovation and upgrade of thoracoscopes, especially for the domestic thoracoscopes.MethodsThe project coordination team initially formulated the evaluation index system for the clinical function and applicability of thoracoscope by querying literature and brainstorming. The Delphi expert consultation method was used to distribute questionnaires to the selected experts. Experts provided scores which were based on the importance of each indicator, and clarified the basis of their judgment and the familiarity with the evaluation indicators. After two rounds of screening by Delphi method, a thoracoscopic clinical function and applicability satisfactory questionnaire was formed. The appropriate sample for pre-investigation was selected, and the reliability and validity were tested. The index composition was adjusted based on the results of the test to form a final evaluation scale.ResultsThe project coordination team initially formulated 24 thoracoscope-related evaluation indicators. After two rounds of experts consultation, the item "brightness adjustment" was deleted without any additional entries. The positive coefficients of the experts in the first round and the second round were 100.0% and 80.0%, respectively. The two rounds of authoritative coefficients were 0.86 and 0.90, and the coordination coefficients were 0.272 (P<0.001) and 0.523 (P<0.001), respectively. A total of 140 questionnaires were issued in this pre-investigation. The recovery rate was 100.0% and the effective rate was 90.0%. The Cronbach's α value of the scale was 0.936, and the Spearman-Brown split-half reliability coefficient was 0.972. The factor analysis finally extracted 3 common factors. The total variance of the cumulative interpretation was 70.9%. The three common factors were named "operation related", "image related" and "device related".ConclusionThe evaluation index system developed in this study has good reliability and validity, and can be used as a tool to evaluate the clinical function and applicability of thoracoscopes.
In the context of the rapid development of contemporary medical industry and the unbalanced development of various subspecialties, expert consensus plays an extremely important role in guiding clinical practice and improving the quality of medical care. However, there are some deficiencies and limitations in the formation process and final report of the expert consensus. Therefore, this paper summarizes and reviews the definition, applications, and functions of expert consensus and the new progress of expert consensus formation methods by fully reviewing the literature, and puts forward the prospect. The purpose is to provide a reference for the production and application of expert consensus related to medical care, improve the outcomes of medical care, and upgrade the quality and level of medical services.
ObjectivesTo construct a symptom assessment system suitable for surgical lung cancer patients, and to objectively evaluate the types and severity of postoperative symptoms in patients so as to provide evidence-based basis for the treatment of postoperative symptoms of lung cancer patients.MethodsPostoperative symptom items of lung cancer were formed according to previous researches, literature review, the current lung cancer symptom assessment tools, and expert interviews. The Delphi method was used to conduct two rounds of expert consultation and a postoperative symptom inventory was established for lung cancer patients.ResultsNine first-level symptom items were eventually formed: cough, pain, shortness of breath, fatigue, dizziness, nausea or vomiting, subcutaneous emphysema, insomnia, and constipation. The first round of active coefficient and authority coefficient of experts were 85.0% and 0.88, and the second round were 88.2% and 0.87. The Kendall coordination coefficients of the nine first-level symptom items were 0.47 (P<0.001) and 0.43 (P<0.001), respectively.ConclusionsThe evaluation system of postoperative symptom items for lung cancer patients is highly recognized by experts and has good consistency.