Objective To summarize the clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment of severe primary graft dysfunction ( PGD grade 3 ) in early stage after lung transplantation. Methods From September 2002 to December 2010, there were 10 patients with severe PGD ( grade 3) in early stage after lung transplantation ( LTx) in 100 patients with end-stage lung disease underwent LTx in Wuxi People’s Hospital. In which there were 2 cases with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 4 with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis,1 case with lung tuberculosis, 1 case with silicosis, 2 cases with bronchiectasis. There were 7 patients with single LTx [ 3 cases with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ( ECMO) support] and 3 patients with bilateral LTx ( 1 case with ECMO support) . Results The surgical procedures of these 10 patients were successful, however severe PGD occurred on 1-5 days after operation. 4 cases died of respiratory failure with negative fluid balance and mechanical ventilation support, and 2 cases recovered. 4 cases underwent ECMO support, in which 2 cases successfully weaned from ECMO and discharged from hospital, others died of multiple organ failure.Conclusions Severe PGD is one of the fatal early complication after lung transplantation. Early diagnosis and treatment are very important to improve the perioperative mortality rate.
Objective To summarize the clinical experiences of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) which provides temporary cardiopulmonary assist for critical patients, and preliminary analysis of the cause of failure. Methods From February 2005 to October 2008, 58 adult patients (male 42, female 16) undergoing cardiogenic shock required temporary ECMO support. Age was 44.8±17.6 years, and support duration of ECMO was 131.9±104.7 hours. There were 24 patients (41.4%) with coronary heart disease, 11 patients (19.0%) with cardiomyopathy, 10 patients (17.2%) with cardiac valve disease,and 9 patients (15.5%) with congenital heart disease. Results 22 patients died in hospital. 11 patients (50%) died of multisystem organ failure, 5 patients (22.7%) died of refractory heart failure despite the ECMO support. Another patients died of bleeding and severe pulmonary hypertension etc. The percentage for patients need cardiac resuscitation before ECMO support and patients with acute renal failure treated by continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) under ECMO support were obviously higher in dead patients than those in survivor patients (45.5% vs.19.4%, 40.9% vs. 5.6%; P=0.043，0.001). All of the discharged patients were reassessed, mean followup time were 15.6 months. Three patients died of refractory heart failure， 1 patient died of neurologic complications. The other 32 survivors were in good condition with cardiac symptom of New York Heart Association class Ⅰ or Ⅱ. Conclusion ECMO offers effective cardiopulmonary support in adults. Early intervention and control of complications could improve our results with increasing experience. Combining using CRRT during the ECMO support is associated with significantly higher mortality rate. Suffered cardiac arrest prior to ECMO also influences the survival.
Abstract： Objective To summarize the clinical experiences of performing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on patients with heart and respiratory failure, and compare the clinical outcomes of Medtronic system and Quadrox PLS system. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 121 heart and respiratory failure patients who underwent ECMO treatment in Fu Wai Hospital from December 2004 to December 2009. Based on the different systems used, 121 patients were divided into two groups. In group M, there were 65 patients including 41 males and 24 females, with an age of 26.6±25.9 years; and they accepted Medtronic ECMO system treatment. In group Q, there were 56 patients including 39 males and 17 females, with an age of 32.4±23.9 years and they underwent Quadrox PLS ECMO system treatment. The evaluation of the clinical outcomes of these two different systems was based on the comparison of transmembrane pressure drop (TMPD), anticoagulation, hemolysis, plasma leakage, organ function, complication and hospital mortality between the two groups. Results Compared with group M, ECMO with Quadrox PLS system was associated with lower TMPD (at the beginning of ECMO: 15.0±6.0 mm Hg vs.28.0±5.0 mm Hg, P=0.000; 24 hours later: 16.0±5.0 mm Hg vs. 30.0±7.0 mm Hg, P=0.000) and less thrombus formation(7.1% vs.23.1%, P=0.037), less plasma leakage (0.0% vs. 50.8%, P=0.000), less hemolysis (14.3% vs. 29.2%, P=0.047). There were no significant differences between the two groups in support duration, complication rate, and hospital mortality(Pgt;0.05). Conclusion Both devices have similar effects for safe clinical application, but Quadrox PLS ECMO system has a relatively high biocompatibility with lower TMPD, less plasma leakage, and thrombus formation.
Although extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been in existence since the 1970s as a means of supporting respiratory or cardiac function, early application of this technology was plagued by high complication rates. Peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) causes higher left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, pulmonary edema, left ventricular distention, ventricular arrhythmia, low coronary perfusion, myocardial ischemia, substantial thrombus formation within left ventricule cavity and even multiple organ dysfunction. Mechanical left ventricular decompression is required to treat these related complications. In this article, we reviewed the problems associated with left ventricular decompression supported by peripheral V-A ECMO in patients with cardiogenic shock.
Objective To investigate the predictive value of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) pre-computer multiple scoring systems in the mortality of patients with cardiogenic shock. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 100 patients with cardiogenic shock due to various reasons who were treated with veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) from July 2020 to July 2022. The patients were followed up for 30 days and divided into a survival group (35 cases) and a death group (65 cases) according to whether they survived 30 days after withdrawal. General clinical data, blood biochemistry data within 24 hours before ECMO, ventilator parameters, past medical history and other data were collected, and sequential organ failure score (SOFA) before VA-ECMO, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHEⅡ), survival after veno-arterial ECMO (SAVE) score and modified SAVE score were calculated. Blood biochemical indicators and clinical scores related to patient prognosis were screened using two-independent sample t test or Man-Whitney U test. The predictive efficacy of each score on short-term prognosis (30-day post-discharge mortality) was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve and area under curve (AUC). Results There were significant differences in APACHEⅡ score, SAVE score and modified SAVE score between two groups (P<0.05). The AUC and its 95%CI of APACHEⅡ score was 0.696 (95%CI 0.592 - 0.801), of SAVE score was 0.617 (95%CI 0.498 - 0.736), and of post SAVE score was 0.664 (95%CI 0.545 - 0.782), respectively. All AUCs were relatively low (<0.75). Conclusion SOFA, APACHEⅡ, SAVE score and modified SAVE score have limited clinical value in the prognosis assessment of ECMO patients, and do not show obvious advantages.
ObjectiveTo summarize the experience of applying extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) after cardiac surgery in adult patient. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 27 patients underwent ECMO from December 2011 to October 2013. There were 15 males and 12 females at the mean age of 51±11 years ranging from 41 to 73 years. Vein-artery perfusion was performed in all 27 patients. ResultsAll 27 patients underwent ECMO. The mean time of using ECMO was 81.2±36.4 hours ranging from 48.0-192.0 hours. The mean time of hospital stay was 307.8±97.0 hours ranging from 168.0-480.0 hours. The rate of weaning from ECMO was 77.8% (21/27). The rate of discharge was 51.9% (14/27). The rate of perioperative mortality was 44.4% (12/27). ConclusionEffective monitoring with other supportive equipments is helpful to promote the result of ECMO.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical value of fibrinogen-albumin-ratio (FAR) in adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) hemorrhage. MethodsThe clinical data of adult patients receiving ECMO in the West China Hospital from 2018 to 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into a bleeding group and a non-bleeding group based on whether they experienced bleeding after ECMO. Logistic regression analysis was used to study the relationship between FAR and bleeding, as well as risk factors for death. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) were used to analyze the predictive ability of FAR. According to the optimal cut-off value of FAR for predicting hemorrhage, patients were divided into a high-risk group and a low-risk group, and the occurrence of bleeding was compared between the two groups. ResultsA total of 125 patients were enrolled in this study, including 85 males and 40 females, aged 46.00 (31.50, 55.50) years. Among them, 58 patients received veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and 67 patients received veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). There were 49 patients having bleeding, and the lactate level was higher (P=0.026), the platelet count before ECMO initiation and 24 h after ECMO initiation was lower (P=0.031, 0.020), the fibrinogen level 24 h after ECMO initiation was lower (P=0.049), and the proportion of myocarditis patients was higher (P=0.017) in the bleeding group than those of the non-bleeding group. In the subgroup analysis of ECMO mode, the higher D-Dimer, lactate level and lower FAR before and 24 h after ECMO initiation were associated with bleeding in the VA-ECMO group (P=0.017, 0.011, 0.033, 0.005). The 24 h FAR was independently correlated with bleeding (P=0.048), and AUC was 0.714. The cut-off value was 55.73. According to this optimal cut-off value, 25 patients were divided into the high-risk group (≤55.73) and 33 into the low-risk group (>55.73). There was a higher incidence of bleeding in the high-risk group compared to the low-risk group (unadjusted P=0.002; P=0.013 for multivariable adjustment). In the VV-ECMO group, the relationship between FAR and bleeding events was not significant (P>0.05). ConclusionLow 24 h FAR is an independent risk factor for bleeding in VA-ECMO patients, and the diagnostic cut-off value is 55.73.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the monitoring value of brain injury biomarkers in the patients during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, and CBM from inception of each database to May 2015 to identify randomized controlled trials, or case-control trials, or cohort trials of brain injury biomarkers predict brain injury during ECMO. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 12.0 software. ResultsFour retrospective trials were included. The results showed that compared with patients without brain injury, the patients with brain injury had a higher level of S100B protein (P < 0.05). The incidence of major neurological events was higher for high neuron-specific enolase level patients than mild-to-moderate neuron-specific enolase level patients (85% vs. 29%, P=0.01). The incidence of brain injury was higher for normal glial fibrillary acidic protein level than patients with glial fibrillary acidic protein > 0.436 ng/ml (OR=11.5, 95%CI 1.3-98.3). ConclusionsBrain injury biomarkers may be used as an indicator for earlier diagnosis of brain injury in patients during ECMO.
A 69-year-old male was presented with exercise intolerance and progressive exertional dyspnea for 3 months. His main clinical diagnosis were degenerative valvular disease, severe aortic stenosis, severe aortic regurgitation, severe mitral regurgitation, severe tricuspid regurgitation, ventricular electrical storm, chronic heart failure, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class Ⅳ heart function. He was encountered with sudden ventricular electrical storm in the emergency room. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was impanted beside during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was successfully performed under the guidance of transesophageal echocardiography when hemodynamics permitted. ECMO was withdrawn on the 5th day and discharged on the 21st day. TAVR is safe and effective for the treatment of high-risk aortic stenosis, and ECMO support is the key for the success of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Objective We aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the ECMO versus mechanical ventilation through a rapid health technology assessment. Methods PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, meta-analyses, complete economic evaluations, and CRD database for HTA reports from inception to December 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Descriptive analysis and summary were then performed. Results A total of 21 references were involved, including 2 HTA reports, 5 RCTs, 11 systematic reviews or meta-analyses, and 3 economic evaluations. The quality of the literature evidence was heterogenous, and only 2 RCTs of high quality were included for meta-analysis. The results showed that the difference of 60-day mortality between ECMO and mechanical ventilation was statistically significant (RR=0.73, 95%CI 0.57 to 0.92, P=0.007). The majority of recent meta-analysis literature showed that short-term mortality of ECMO treatment was lower than that of mechanically ventilated patients. The cost-effective literature from different countries all showed that it was cost-effective in their respective health system, however, the quality of the literature varied. Conclusions Current evidence shows that ECMO has better safety, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness for ARDS compared with mechanical ventilation. However, it still required to be verified by high-quality studies with a long-term follow-up. Validate conclusions are needed through rigorous health technology assessments.