ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on delayed encephalopathy caused by carbon monoxide poisoning.MethodsChina National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, CQVIP data, China Biology Medicine Database, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrance Library were searched by computer for randomized controlled trials on hyperbaric oxygenation for delayed encephalopathy caused by carbon monoxide poisoning which were published in English or Chinese from the dates of establishment of the databases to March 31st, 2019. After literature including, excluding, and screening, RevMan 5.2 software was used to conduct a meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 25 studies were included, including 1 797 patients, 924 in the hyperbaric oxygen therapy group (the trial group) and 873 in the control group. The clinical effective rate [relative risk (RR)=1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.19, 1.30), P<0.000 01], the normal rate of electroencephalogram [RR=2.10, 95%CI (1.18, 3.75), P=0.01], the Mini-Mental State Examination score [standard mean difference (SMD)= 3.19, 95%CI (2.06, 4.32), P<0.000 01], and the Activities of Daily Living score [SMD=1.46, 95%CI (1.02, 1.90), P<0.000 01] were all higher in the trial group than those in the control group.ConclusionHyperbaric oxygen therapy for delayed encephalopathy caused by carbon monoxide poisoning can improve symptoms.
Object To collect and summarize high quality clinical evidence on the use of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) in health care generally. Method We searched MEDLINE (1980-2006), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2006) and the China Biomedicine Database (1982-2006) for systematic reviews, meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials. The quality of included studies was critically evaluated. Result Thirteen systematic reviews (12 Cochrane reviews) on HBO were included. Results showed that HBO had some beneficial effect on acute coronary syndrome, ischemic stroke, multiple sclerosis, malignant otitis externa, idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus. It might also promote chronic wound healing and relieve radiation damage.Conclusions Since the avaliable randomized controlled trials for the systematic reviews we included are too small, further well-designed multicentre large-scale trials are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of HBO .
ObjectiveTo observe the effect of preoperative hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) pretreatment on systemic inflammatory response after extracorporeal circulation. MethodsA total of 30 patients who were going to receive mitral or aortic valve replacement were randomly allocated into a control group (group C, n=15) and a pretreatment group (group P, n=15).Three sessions of HBO pretreatments were given to the patients in the group P before operation. The changes of serum concentration of inflammatory factors including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, P-selectin, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, heat shock protein (HSP)-70 between the two groups were compared at four time points:before incision of skin (T1), 30 min after ECC(T2), 1 h (T3) and 24 h (T4) after the end of ECC. ResultsThere was no statistical difference in the serum concentration of IL-6,TNF-α, P-selectin, ICAM-1, IL-10, and HSP-70 at T1 between the two groups (P>0.05). The level of all inflammatory factors ascended in first and descended at last in both groups, which reached a peak at T3 and descended at T4. But the serum concentration at T4 was still higher than the level at T1 (P<0.05). There was a statistical difference in serum level of HSP-70 between T4 and T1 (373.3±96.7 pg/ml vs. 316.3±55.5 pg/ml, P<0.05). There were statistical differences in serum concentration of IL-6 (141.5±25.9 pg/ml vs. 119.2±31.8 pg/ml), HSP-70 (449.8±48.3 pg/ml vs. 373.3±96.7 pg/ml), and IL-10 (64.2±8.2 pg/ml vs. 90.3±14.2 pg/ml) between the group C and the group P at T4 (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in postoperative ICU stay time and thoracic drainage. While time of postoperative ventilation in the group P was shorter than that in the group C with a statistical difference (11.4±5.6 days vs. 15.8±5.1 days, P<0.05). ConclusionHyperbaric oxygen pretreatment before operation can abate the bad inflammatory response after heart valve replacement surgery to some extent and strengthen the anti-inflammatory protection, thereby favoring the reduction in postoperative complications.
【Abstract】Objective To investigate therapeutic effect and mechanism of hyperbaric oxygen and ulinastatin respectively or combinatively used to treat acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP). Methods One hundred and twenty SD rats were divided into 6 groups randomly: group of normal control, group receiving sham operation, group of untreated acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP group), group of acute necrotizing pancreatitis treated with hyperbaric oxygen (HBO group), group of acute necrotizing pancreatitis treated with ulinastatin (ULT group), and group of acute necrotizing pancreatitis treated with combined hyperbaric oxygen and ulinastatin (HBO+ULT group). The rat model of acute necrotizing pancreatitis was established according to Aho HJ et al. Concentrations of amylase, TNFα, TXB2 and 6ketoPGF1α in blood were measured through ELISA or radioimmunoassay. Changes of pancreatic histopathology were investigated. SPSS 10.0 was used in statistical analysis. Results The concentrations of amylase, TNFα, TXB2 in the ANPtreated groups were significantly lower than those of ANP group (P＜0.01) except for 6ketoPGF1α and the levels of amylase and TNFα of HBO group were strikingly higher than those in HBO+ULT group. Only the level of AMS was significantly different between ULT group and HBO+ULT group (P＜0.01). Pancreas histopathological scores(HS) and CD8 counts of ANP group were significantly higher than those the other three group, but CD4 counts and CD4/CD8 ratio were on the contrary (P＜0.05). HS of HBO and ULT were strikingly higher than those of HBO+ULT (P＜0.05).Conclusion ①Hyperbaric oxygen or ulinastatin can effectively decrease the blood levels of enzymes and cytokines and improve the pancreatic immunity. ②Hyperbaric oxygen in combination with ulinastatin are more effective than either of them in the treatment of ANP.
ObjectiveTo study the effect of hyperbaric oxygen combined with nimodipine in the treatment of cerebral dysfunction resulted from traumatic brain injury. MethodWe retrospectively collected and analyzed the data of 124 patients with cerebral dysfunction induced by traumatic brain injury, admitted to the Neurosurgery Department during February 2011 to February 2014. All the patients were divided into the traditional treatment group (n=45), the traditional treatment with hyperbaric oxygen group (HBO group, n=40) and the traditional treatment with nimodipine and hyperbaric oxygen group (integrated group, n=39). The differences among the three groups in neurological injury severity evaluated by National Institute of Health Stroke Scale and the cerebral blood flow were recorded and analyzed at three time points (before the treatment, 2 and 4 weeks after treatment). ResultsThere was no significant difference in neurological injury severity and cerebral blood flow among these three groups before treatment (P>0.05). Evaluated at 2 and 4 weeks after treatments, the neurological injury severity of HBO group and integrated group were significantly less than the traditional treatment group (P<0.05); the neurological severity score of integrated group was significantly lower than the HBO group (P<0.05); the cerebral blood flow of HBO group and integrated group were significantly higher than the traditional treatment group (P<0.05); and the cerebral blood flow of integrated group was significantly higher than the HBO group (P<0.05). ConclusionsThe combination therapy of hyperbaric oxygen combined with nimodipine is effective in the treatment of cerebral dysfunction induced by traumatic brain injury, because of its attenuation of neurological injury severity and increase of cerebral blood flow.
ObjectiveTo explore the safety of ventilator support in hyperbaric oxygen chamber and the prevention of related complications.MethodsFrom July 2016 to December 2018, there were 127 intensive care unit patients underwent hyperbaric oxygen therapy with ventilator. Medical professionals in hyperbaric medicine or intensive care medicine were arranged to accompany the patients in the treatment process, to observe the patients’ condition changes closely, monitor their heart rate, respiration, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation, and perform sputum suction at any time if needed and monitor the airway peak pressure change to prevent pneumothorax.ResultsDuring the process of hyperbaric oxygen therapy, 13 patients (10.24%) were treated with analgesia/sedation for patient-ventilator asynchrony, 4 patients (3.15%) exited the champer emergently for acute left heart failure, 3 patients (2.36%) had epileptic seizures, 3 patients (2.36%) had aspiration, and 1 patient (0.79%) had breath and cardiac arrest. After emergency treatment, all the patients returned to the ward safely.ConclusionDuring the treatment of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for intensive care unit patients with ventilator, the accompany of qualified professionals in hyperbaric medicine or intensive care medicine in the hyperbaric oxygen chamber can treat the patients’ symptoms timely and reduce the risk greatly.
Objective To observe the short-term effect and safety of hyperbaric oxygen combined with edaravone and ozagrel sodium in treating progressive cerebral infarction. Methods A total of 65 in-patients with acute progressive cerebral infarction were randomly divided into two groups: 33 in-patients in the trial group were treated by hyperbaric oxygen combined with edaravone and ozagrel sodium, while the other 32 in-patients in the control group were treated by edaravone and ozagrel sodium. The course of treatment was 14 days. The following indications were assessed before and after the treatment respectively: the national institutes of health stroke scale (NIHSS), activities of daily living (ADL), and clinical effects. Results This study showed that the scores of both ADL and NIHSS in the trial group were higher than those in the control group, with significant differences (Plt;0.05). The clinical effective rate of the trial group was 90.91% which was obviously higher than the control group with a significant difference (P=0.028). There were no obvious adverse reactions in both groups. Conclusion Hyperbaric oxygen combined with both edaravone and ozagrel sodium is notable in short-term effect and safe, thus it is worth being popularized in clinical treatment.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygen treatment for patients with post-stroke depression. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about hyperbaric oxygen treatment with placebo or open control in patients with post-stroke depression were comprehensively retrieved in PubMed (1966 to 2012.12), EMbase (1974 to 2012.12), EBSCO (1965 to 2012.12), CENTRAL (2012.11), CBM (1978 to 2012.12), CNKI (1980 to 2012.12), and VIP (1989 to 2012.12). References of the included articles were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0. Results Twelve trials involving 822 patients were included, all of which were randomized non-placebo controlled trials. The results of meta-analysis of 12 trials (n=822) showed, the improvement of depression symptoms in the HBO group was better than that in the control group (MD=4.82, 95%CI 3.12 to 6.52). However, funnel plot showed that publication bias was large. After removing three trials for sensitive analysis, the results showed that the improvement of depression symptoms in the HBO group was still better than that in the control group (MD=3.91, 95%CI 3.35 to 4.47). Adverse events were reported in 2 trials, including dizziness, palpitation, mild earache, tinnitus, etc. However, no severe adverse events occurred. Conclusion Current evidence indicates that, HBO can effectively reduce the score of HAMD and no serious adverse reactions occurred. It’s necessary to further carry out high quality randomized controlled trials with large sample size due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, so as to assess its effectiveness and safety.
Hypoxia and other factors are related to cognitive impairment. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy can improve tissue oxygen supply to improve brain hypoxia. Based on the basic principle of hyperbaric oxygen therapy, hyperbaric oxygen has been widely used in recent years for cognitive impairment caused by stroke, brain injury, neurodegenerative disease, neuroinflammatory disease and metabolic encephalopathy. This article will review the basic mechanism of hyperbaric oxygen, and summarize and discuss the improvement of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on cognitive and brain diseases, in order to provide relevant reference for clinical treatment.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy of oxygen therapy for diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCT) on the efficacy of different oxygen therapies for DFUs from inception to April 1, 2024. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Statistical analysis was performed using R software, and GraphPad Prism was used for graphical representations. ResultsA total of 61 RCTs involving 4 306 DFUs cases were included in the analysis. The oxygen therapies examined primarily included hyperbaric oxygen, topical oxygen, and ozone therapy. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that hyperbaric oxygen therapy ranked highest for healing rate, area reduction rate, and healing time (SUCRA values were 0.957, 0.868, and 0.869, respectively). However, hyperbaric oxygen therapy also ranked higher for amputation rate and adverse events (SUCRA values were 0.616 and 0.718, respectively). Further subgroup analysis revealed that hyperbaric oxygen therapy maintained the highest ranking in area reduction rate across subgroups defined by publication language and treatment duration. ConclusionHyperbaric oxygen therapy has advantages in terms of healing rate, area reduction rate, and healing time for DFUs, but it is also associated with higher amputation rates and adverse events. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.