ObjectiveTo study the development of methods assessing donor liver viability in liver transplantation.MethodsThe literature in the recent years on the methods of assessing donor liver viability was reviewed.ResultsFrom donor liver morphology to function,there have being developed many methods which assess donor liver viability,including:①donor liver appearance; ②intraoperative biopsies; ③donor liver microcirculation; ④portal pressure; ⑤enzymes levels in liver; ⑥lidocainemetabolizing activity; ⑦energy metabolism of donor liver; ⑧fat content in donor liver.ConclusionThere are many methods to assess the viability of donor liver. Each has its supericrity and defect respectively. Intraoperative biopsies, 31Pmagnetic resonance spectroscopy and portal pressure have more importance in clinical application.
Background As part of the core outcome set (COS), the core traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome set can improve the consistency of syndrome efficacy evaluation outcomes in TCM clinical research. Previous studies proposed and empirically verified a method of developing core TCM syndrome sets based on complex syndromes under the disease-syndrome combination research model. However, this method is developed on the basis of syndrome types, which has the limitation that the finally included syndrome types are too single to adapt to the complexity of clinical syndromes. Therefore, it is urgent to optimize the existing development method to balance the complexity of clinical syndromes and methodological feasibility. Methods This study adopted qualitative research methods to obtain opinions from TCM clinicians and researchers on developing methods, efficacy evaluation criteria, and construction forms through expert steering committee meetings and semi-structured interviews. The sample size of semi-structured interviews was determined until data saturation was reached, and thematic analysis was used to analyze the transcription results. Results In the expert steering committee meeting, 60% (3/5) of the experts believed that developing in the form of syndrome elements was more operable; in the semi-structured interviews, 77.78% (7/9) of the experts supported developing in the form of syndrome elements, considering it convenient to use. Meanwhile, the research team added an expert semi-structured interview link in the development process, which complemented the cross-sectional survey used in previous studies to jointly improve the original list of TCM syndrome elements. Conclusion The method of developing core TCM syndrome sets based on syndrome elements formed in this study can consider clinical practice while improving the unity of TCM syndrome efficacy evaluation standards, which is helpful to promote the standardized development of TCM clinical research.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the methodological quality of cross-sectional surveys about Chinese medicine syndrome in a population at potential risk of cerebrovascular diseases. Methods The CNKI, WanFang Data, CBM and PubMed databases were electronically searched to collect cross-sectional surveys about Chinese medicine syndromes in a population at potential risk of cerebrovascular diseases from inception to December, 2022. The methodological quality was assessed using the JBI scale. Results A total of 105 studies were included. The average reporting rate of JBI was 52.06%, and the items with the highest scores included "sufficient coverage of the identified sample in data analysis" (100%), "description of study subjects and setting" (92.38%), and "using valid methods for the identification of the condition" (86.67%). Items with the lowest scores included "adequate sample size" (13.33%), "adequate response rate or low response rate managed appropriately" (14.29%), and "study participants recruited in an appropriate way" (20.95%). Subgroup analysis suggested that type of publication and number of implementation centers were potential factors influencing methodology quality (P<0.05). Conclusion The methods essential to a cross-sectional survey such as sampling, sample size calculation and handling with the response rate, and the syndrome diagnosis scales specific to Chinese medicine require further improvement.
This article mainly introduced the purpose and scope relating to the 11 Cochrane methods groups for Cochrane systematic reviews and encourage more people to contribute to the research on methodology.
ObjectiveTo explore the methods to improve the success rate of intubation and reduce the intubation time consuming in emergency orotracheal intubation by improving the method of holding laryngoscope. MethodsA total of 146 patients needed orotracheal intubation were randomly divided into a traditional group who was intubated with traditional method of holding laryngoscope and an improved group who was intubated with improved method of holding laryngoscope. The success rate of intubation for the first time, success rate in difficult intubation, intubation time consuming, the incidence of complications by mechanical injury between two groups were compared. ResultsSixty-nine petients received traditional method of holding laryngoscope and 77 petients received improvement method of holding laryngoscope. The success rate for the first time intubation [71(92.2%) vs. 56(81.2%)] and success rate in difficult intubation [13(72.2%) vs. 3(23.1%)] of the improved group were higher than those of the traditional group. The differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). The intubation time consuming [(28.3±3.5)s vs. (35.6±4.1)s] and the incidence of complications by mechanical injury [1(1.3%) vs. 6(8.7%)] of the improved group were lower than those of the traditional group with statistical significance (all P < 0.05). ConclusionThe success rate of intubation for the first time and the difficult intubation can be improved effectively, and the intubation time consuming and the incidence of complications by mechanical injury can be reduced effectively by improving the method of holding laryngoscope.
As precision medicine continues to gain momentum, the number of predictive model studies is increasing. However, the quality of the methodology and reporting varies greatly, which limits the promotion and application of these models in clinical practice. Systematic reviews of prediction models draw conclusions by summarizing and evaluating the performance of such models in different settings and populations, thus promoting their application in practice. Although the number of systematic reviews of predictive model studies has increased in recent years, the methods used are still not standardized and the quality varies greatly. In this paper, we combine the latest advances in methodologies both domestically and abroad, and summarize the production methods and processes of a systematic review of prediction models. The aim of this study is to provide references for domestic scholars to produce systematic reviews of prediction models.
Evidence-based medicine advocates to support clinical decision-making with the best evidence, which is useful to objectively evaluate the clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine and optimize clinical diagnosis and treatment. However, significant individualized characteristics identified from syndrome differentiation and treatment are incompatible with evidence-based clinical decision-making, which highlights population-level evidence, to some extent. In recent years, a number of new methods and technologies have been introduced into individualized clinical efficacy evaluation research of traditional Chinese medicine to assist managing and processing complex and multivariate information. These methods and technologies share similarities with evidence-based medicine, and are expected to link the clinical practice of traditional Chinese medicine with evidence-based clinical decision-making. They will guide the development of evidence-based clinical decision-making in traditional Chinese medicine.
Surgical management of osteoarthritis of the knee: evidence based guideline contains 38 recommendations pertaining to the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative care of patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) who are considering surgical treatment. Compared with the domestic consensus on diagnosis and treatment for KOA, this clinical practice guideline (CPG) prepared by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) has some advantages in terms of methodology selection and recommendation. Therefore, it is necessary for us to interpret this CPG to speed up the understanding and dissemination of the CPG. The ultimate aims are to: ① strengthen the standardization and understanding of surgical treatment of KOA; ② enhance the understanding of clinicians for this CPG in treating KOA; ③ speed up the development of guideline development methodologies in China; ④ provide methodological guidance for the development of CPG based on the current situation in China.
Objective To explore the methods used for developing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for acupuncture. Methods Based on the characteristics of acupuncture in traditional Chinese medicine,and principles of evidence-based medicine, this article introduces and summarizes the processes and methods for developing an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for acupuncture. We analyzed similarities and differences between clinical practice guidelines for acupuncture and for other interventions. We used an evidence-based clinical practice guideline of acupuncture for depression as an example to illustrate the methods of literature search, grading of evidence and recommendations, evidence evaluation and consensus formation. Results Preliminary recommendations on the methods for developing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for acupuncture were made. Conclusion Based on the optimized rational methodology for developing clinical guidelines, evidence-based high-quality clinical practice guidelines for acupuncture could be established.
New interventions are rapidly progressing into clinical practice through the preclinical study stage. The animal experiments should be comprehensive and critically evaluated for their pivotal role in this process. To integrate the evidence of animal studies by systematic review throws light on intervention outcomes and could decrease risk of participants in human trials. The methodological weakness of animal studies is easy to highlight but robust methods to synthesize evidence is essential. Here, we discuss some problems in systematic review of animal experiments and whether animal models of diverse species contribute to bias of meta-analysis conclusions.