ObjectiveTo analyze clinical experience and outcomes of bileaflet preservation in mitral valve replace-ment (MVR) for patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR). MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 17 patients with severe MR who underwent MVR with bileaflet preservation in the Department of Cardiovascular surgery of Guangdong General Hospital from June 2011 to January 2013. There were 14 males and 3 females with mean age of 63.41±11.82 years (range, 38 to 82 years). There were 13 patients with atrial fibrillation. Preoperatively, 5 patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class Ⅲ, and 12 patients were in NYHA class Ⅳ. There were 7 patients with ischemic MR, 9 patients with degenerative MR, and 1 patient with rheumatic MR. ResultsMVR with bileaflet preservation was performed for all the patients. Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was performed for 4 patients. Eleven patients received bioprosthetic MVR, and 6 patients received mechanical MVR. There was no in-hospital death, postoperative low cardiac output syndrome or left ventricular rupture. All the 17 patients were followed up for a mean duration of 16.44±5.02 months (range, 2 to 25 months). During follow-up, 1 patient died of severe paravalvular leak 2 months after surgery. All the other patients had good mitral valve function. None of the patients had anticoagulation or prosthetic valve related complication. Patient's heart function was significantly improved. Eleven patients were in NYHA functional class Ⅰ, 4 patients were in NYHA class Ⅱ, and 1 patient was in NYHA class Ⅲ. Cardiothoracic ratio, left atrial dimension, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension and left ventricular end-systole dimension postoperatively and during follow-up were significantly smaller than preoperative values. Postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly lower than preoperative LVEF(50.94%±8.78% vs. 55.31%±10.44%, P=0.04), but LVEF during follow-up was not statistically different from preoperative LVEF(55.31%±10.44% vs. 56.13%±9.67%, P=0.73), and LVEF during follow-up was significantly higher than postoperative LVEF(56.13%±9.67% vs. 50.94%±8.78%, P=0.02). There was no statistical difference between postoperative mitral pressure half-time (PHT)and PHT during follow-up (95.06±19.00 ms vs. 94.56±19.19 ms, P=0.91). ConclusionMVR with bileaflet preservation is a safe and effective surgical technique for patients with severe MR, and can significantly improve postoperative left ventricular remodeling and function.
Abstract： Objective To investigate the cause, treatment， and prevention strategy of early left ventricular rupture after mitral valve replacement （MVR）. Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 7 patients who had early left ventricular rupture after MVR， among a total of 2 638 MVR patients， between May 1981 and November 2010 in General Hospital of Shenyang Military District. There were 2 male patients and 5 female patients with their age ranging from 28 to 71 years old. One patient was New York Heart Association （NYHA） functional classⅡand 6 patients were NYHA functional classⅢ. Preoperative echocardiography showed that their left ventricular ejection fraction （LVEF） was 49%-60% and their left ventricular end diastolic volume （LVEDV） was 29-42 ml. All the patients underwent prothetic valve replacement under moderate hypothermia， general anesthesia and extracorporeal circulation. Results All the 7patients underwent surgical repair for their early left ventricular rupture. There were 2 patients with TypeⅠ， 4 patients with TypeⅡ， and 1 patient with TypeⅢleft ventricular rupture. Four patients died of hemorrhagic shock or low cardiac output syndrome. Three patients were successfully healed and discharged from hospital 7-15 days after the operation. The 3 surviving patients were followed up for 4.5-18.0 years, and they all had good general condition and satisfactory quality of life. No late pseudo-aneurysm was found during follow-up. Conclusions Early left ventricular rupture is difficult to repair with a high mortality. Effective prevention strategy should be applied to avoid it as much as possible. Once left ventricular rupture occurs during the surgery， extracorporeal circulation should be quickly established， and it’s possible to save patients’ life by reliable intracardiac and epicardial repair according to patients’ individual condition.
ObjectiveTo investigate effect of cardiac function and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) degree of concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty for patients with tricuspid valve annulus dilation and mild TR underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR), and provide an objective basis for clinical decision about concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty for patients with tricuspid valve annulus dilation and mild TR underwent MVR. MethodsA total of 36 patients who underwent MVR from April to October 2013 in Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University were enrolled in this study. Preoperative echocardiography showed mild TR and tricuspid valve annular end-diastolic dimension (TVAEDD)/body surface area (BSA)>21 mm/m2. All the 36 patients were randomly divided into a tricuspid annuloplasty group (TAPG group, n=18, including 7 males and 11 females) and a no tricuspid annuloplasty group (NTAPG group, n=18, including 6 males and 12 females). One week and 6 months postoperative echocardiography were recorded. ResultsThere were no statistical differences in age, gender, heart rate, body surface area, preoperative cardiac function (NYHA), left atrium dimension (LAD), left ventricular dimension (LVD), maximal long-axis of RA (RAmla), mid-RA minor distance (RAmmd), right ventricle dimension (RVD2), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS) between the two groups (P>0.05). Six-months postoperative left atrial-ventricular diameter significantly reduced than that before surgery in the two groups (P<0.05). In the TAPG group, six-months postoperative right ventricle dimension (RVD1), right ventricular wall thickness (RVWT), tricuspid valve annular end-diastolic dimension (TVAEDD), tricuspid valve annular end-systolic dimension (TVAESD) significantly decreased, while percent shorting of tricuspid valve annulus (PSTVA) did not change significantly (P>0.05), TR degree improved significantly (P<0.05), right ventricular fractional area change (RVFAC) and right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) significantly increased (P<0.05). In the NTAPG group, compared with preoperative data, six-months postoperative RVD1, RVWT significantly increased, TVAEDD, TVAESD, PSTVA did not change significantly (P>0.05), RVEF reduced significantly (P<0.05), RVFAC increased significantly but less than that in the TAPG group at the same period, constituent ratio of TR changed significantly (P<0.05), but postoperative moderate or more TR were recorded in 6 patients. ConclusionConcomitant tricuspid annuloplasty for patients with tricuspid valve annulus dilation and mild TR underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR) can help to decrease RVD1, RVWT, TVAEDD and TVAESD, improve the constituent ratio of TR, and increase RVFAC and RVEF.
Abstract： Objective To summarize our experience and clinical outcomes of preservation of posterior leaflet and subvalvular structures in mitral valve replacement（MVR）. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 1 035 patients who underwent MVR in Beijing An Zhen Hospital from January 2006 to March 2011. There were 562 male patients and 473 female patients with their age of 37-78（53.84±13.13）years old. There were 712 patients with rheumatic valvular heart disease and 323 patients with degenerative valve disease, 389 patients with mitral stenosis and 646 patients with mitral regurgitation. No patient had coronary artery disease in this group. For 457 patients in non-preservation group, bothleaflets and corresponding chordal excision was performed, while for 578 patients in preservation group, posterior leafletand subvalvular structures were preserved. There was no statistical difference in demographic and preoperative clinical characteristics between the two groups. Postoperative mortality and morbidity, and left ventricular size and function were compared between the two groups. Results There was no statistical difference in postoperative mortality（2.63% vs. 1.21%, P =0.091）and morbidity （8.53% vs. 7.44%, P=0.519）between the non-preservation group and preservation group, except that the rate of left ventricular rupture of non-preservation group was significantly higher than that of preservation group（1.09% vs. 0.00%, P=0.012）. The average left ventricular end-diastolic dimension （LVEDD）measured by echocardiography 6 months after surgery decreased in both groups, but there was no statistical difference between the two groups. The average left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 6 months after surgery was significantly improved compared with preoperative average LVEF in both groups. The average LVEF 6 months after surgery in patients with mitral regurgitation in the preservation group was significantly higher than that in non-preservation group （56.00%±3.47% vs. 53.00%±3.13%，P =0.000）, and there was no statistical difference in the average LVEF 6 months after surgery in patients with mitral stenosis between the two groups（57.00%±5.58% vs. 56.00%±4.79%，P =0.066）. Conclusion Preservation of posterior leaflet and subvalvular structures in MVR is a safe and effective surgical technique to reduce the risk of left ventricle rupture and improve postoperative left ventricular function．
ObjectiveTo compare the safety and efficacy of simple mitral valve replacement with the third intercostal incision on the right side and the conventional midsternum incision.MethodsFrom February 2017 to February 2019, heart surgery in the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical College completed the first simple mitral valve replacement (MVR) operation in 103 patients, of whom 39 patients were received minimally invasive right third intercostal small incision (a minimally invasive surgery group). There were 10 males, 29 females at average age of 59.51 years. There were 64 patients with MVR via the middle section of the common sternum (a conventional surgery group), 22 males and 42 females, with an average age of 60.22 years. Types of lesions: 65 patients were with mitral stenosis, 22 patients with incomplete closure, 16 patients with incomplete closure.ResultsThere was no significant difference in preoperative clinical data between the two groups (P>0.05). The entire group of patients successfully completed the operation. Surgical replacement of mitral valve mechanical valve in 74 patients and biological valve in 29 patients. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the extracardiopulmonary cycle time, aortic blockade time and total hospitalization time. In the early stage of operation, 3 patients were examined for secondary hemostasis, 1 patient was minimally invasive surgery, and the remaining 2 patients were with routine surgery. The infection of incision occurred in 3 patients, all of them were in the routine operation group. All three patients died early after operation in the routine operation group: two were postoperative low cardiac volumetric syndrome leading to multiple organ failure, and the other was sternum infection accompanied by artificial valve endocarditis.ConclusionThere is no significant difference between MVR through the third rib of the right chest and traditional MVR in the safety. However, it has the advantages of small trauma, beauty, low incidence of incision infection and reduced postoperative pain.
ObjectiveTo investigate heart rhythm outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA)of atrial fibrillation (AF)during mitral valve replacement (MVR)for patients with rheumatic heart disease (RHD), and explore clinical results of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA)for postoperative atrial tachycardia (AT). MethodsEleven RHD patients who developed AT after RFA of AF during MVR were enrolled in this study. There were 4 males and 7 females with their age of 49±8 years. Electroanatomic mapping of the left or right atrium was conducted with three-dimensional electroana-tomic mapping system during continuous AT. RFCA was performed at the key areas of AT. ResultsFor MVR, operation time was 149±18 minutes, postoperative hospital stay was 9.5±2.9 days, and length of ICU stay was 1.8±0.4 days. During electroanatomic mapping, 17 ATs were recorded in 11 patients. Six ATs (35%)of 5 patients originated from the right atrium and 11 ATs (65%)of 6 patients originated from the left atrium (LA). Among them, AT of 2 patients was related to the mitral valve ring. Immediate success of RFCA was obtained in 91% (10/11). After a mean follow-up of 17±4 months, 2 patients whose AT originated from LA had AT recurrence. ConclusionsMajority of postoperative ATs originate from LA, and majority of ATs are not mitral-dependent. RFCA is an effective and safe procedure for AT in patients after RFA of AF during MVR.
Surgical bioprosthetic valve in the mitral position typically degenerates in 10-15 years, when intervention is required again. In the past, redo surgical mitral valve replacement has been the only treatment choice for such patients suffering from bioprosthetic valve failure, despite the even higher risk associated with redo open-heart surgery. In recent years, transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation in the mitral position has evolved as an reasonable alternative to redo surgery for the treatment of surgical mitral bioprosthetic valve failure. Here we report an 81-year-old female patient with surgical mitral bioprosthetic valve failure, who successfully underwent valve-in-valve transcatheter mitral valve replacement via the transfemoral-transseptal approach. The procedure was successful owing to comprehensive CT imaging work-up, despite the technical challenges associated with bilateral giant atria and small left ventricle.
Reoperation due to degenerated bioprostheses is an important factor of high-risk thoracic surgeries. In 2020 ACC/AHA guideline, Valve in Valve (ViV) was recommended for high-risk patient instead of surgical mitral valve replacement. This report described a 77-year-old male patient with a failed mitral bioprosthetic valve, evaluated at high risk of surgery, received a transvenous, transseptal transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR). Tracheal intubation was removed at CCU 3 h after surgery without discomfort such as polypnea. The patient was transferred out of the CCU and discharged on the 3rd day. Compared with transapical access, transvenous transseptal access was less invasive, with shorter duration in CCU and hospitalization.
Heart valve replacement is the major surgical treatment of severe valvular diseases. Due to the durability and reoperation-free, mechanical valves are widely used. Bioprosthesis valves became popular recently because of long service life and no demand for lifelong anticoagulation. However, how to choose the appropriate prosthetic heart valves, especially the application of bioprosthesis valves for patients at 55 to 65 years is still a major problem. This review focuses on more effective and scientific basis for rational choice of mechanical and bioprosthesis valve.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the early and mid-term outcomes of GK bileaflet mechanical valve applied in mitral valve replacement. MethodsTwenty patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis underwent mitral valve replacement in our hospital from March 2008 to June 2011. Ten patients of them chose GK bileaflet mechanical valve for surgery (a GK group, 5 males and 5 females, aged 56.4±8.9 years), while the other 10 patients chose Medtronic Open Pivot mechanical valve (a Medtronic group, 4 males and 6 females, aged 50.2±8.0 years). The preoperative, perioperative and postoperative data were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Cardiac CT angiography (CTA) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) were performed to evaluate leaflets opening angle, the morphological features of the mechanical valve and the hemodynamic features in the third year after surgery during the follow-up. ResultsNo mortality, defect, low cardiac output syndrome or bleeding after surgery occurred in either group. The result of 3-year follow-up showed that the function of the mechanical valve showed no difference between the two groups. Cardiac CTA and TEE showed good morphological features in all patients. ConclusionThe GK bileaflet mechanical valve has equivalent effect as Medtronic Open Pivot mechanical valve for mitral valve replacement during the 3-year follow-up.