Objective To observe the clinical application of multidisciplinary team (MDT) treatment in the management of geriatric hip fractures and evaluate its effectiveness. Methods The clinical data of 76 elderly patients with hip fracture managed by MDT approach between August 2016 and February 2018 (MDT group) were retrospectively analyzed and compared with 102 patients managed by traditional orthopedics approach between January 2014 and December 2015 (conventional group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, fracture type, surgical procedure, and other general data between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the number of comorbidities in the MDT group was significantly higher than that in the conventional group (t=6.295, P=0.000), and the proportion of the number of comorbidities between the two groups was also significantly different (χ2=28.442, P=0.000). The consultation rate and transfer rate, time to surgery, rate of surgery within 2 or 3 days, operation time, postoperative hospitalization stay, length of hospitalization stay, hospitalization expense, rate of loss to follow-up, and mortality during hospitalization, 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and 1-year mortality after operation were compared between the two groups. Results The rates of total consultations of the conventional group and the MDT group were 56.86% (58/102) and 56.58% (43/76), respectively, and the rates of total transferred patients were 15.69% (16/102) and 15.79% (12/76), respectively, with no significant differences (P>0.05). Among them, the proportion of patients who transferred into intensive care unit (ICU) in conventional group was significantly higher than that in MDT group and the rates of patients who received geriatric consultation or transferred into geriatric department in MDT group were both significantly higher than those in conventional group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in rates of other department consultation or transfer between the two groups (P>0.05). The time to surgery, operation time, postoperative hospitalization stay, and length of hospitalization stay in MDT group were significantly less than those in conventional group, but the proportion of patients who received surgery within 3 days in MDT group was significantly higher than that in conventional group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who received surgery within 2 days (χ2=2.027, P=0.155). The hospitalization expenses of total patients, femoral neck fracture, and intertrochanteric fracture subgroups in MDT group were all significantly higher than those in conventional group (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in hospitalization expense of subtrochanteric fracture subgroup between the two groups (Z=−1.715, P=0.086). The rate of loss to follow-up in conventional group and MDT group was 6.86% (7/102) and 3.95% (3/76), respectively, with no significant difference (χ2=0.698, P=0.403). The mortalities at hospitalization, 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year after operation in conventional group were 0, 1.05% (1/95), 3.16% (3/95), and 7.37% (7/95), respectively, and in MDT group were 0, 0, 2.74% (2/73), 6.85% (5/73), respectively, showing no significant differences in mortalities between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion MDT model in the management of geriatric hip fractures has been shown to reduce time to surgery, postoperative hospitalization stay, length of hospitalization stay, operation time, and the proportion of patients who received ICU consultation or transferred into ICU. Furthermore, MDT can improve the capacity for developing operations for patients with complex medical conditions and make medical resources used more rationally.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of early graded respiratory severe rehabilitation training for patients with mechanical ventilation under a multidisciplinary model.MethodsTwo hundred and thirty-six patients were surveyed, who were hospitalized in the intensive care unit of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from June 3, 2019 to March 31, 2020. They were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, with 118 patients in each group. The observation group received rehabilitation training using early graded rehabilitation training under the mode of multidisciplinary cooperation, while the control group received routine respiratory rehabilitation training. Diaphragmatic excursion (DE) and diaphragmatic thickening fraction (DTF) of the patients before ventilator weaning were measured by ultrasound. The differences of DE, DTF, peak expiratory flow (PEF), maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), success rate of withdrawal, duration of mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) stay between the two groups were recorded and compared.ResultsAll evaluation indexes were statistically significant between the observation group and the control group (all P<0.05). There were interaction between oxygenation index, PEF, MIP, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Score, Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score and recovery time.ConclusionRehabilitation training on early graded severe respiratory diseases under a multidisciplinary model can improve the respiratory function of patients on mechanical ventilation and shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay.
Objective To explore the application of fast track surgery (FTS) mode through multidisciplinary cooperation for the perioperative period of liver cancer. Methods A total of 188 patients with liver cancer treated between April and December 2014 were randomly divided into two groups: FTS group (n=94) and control group (n=94). The FTS group was treated with multidisciplinary cooperative FTS mode, while the control group was treated with traditional perioperative treatment. The self-care ability of daily life, pain, ambulation time and frequency, anal exhaust time, defecation time, hospital stay, hospitalization expenses and readmission rate were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the control group, patients in the FTS group had a better ability of self-care one to three days after surgery, more reduced pain 8, 24 and 48 hours after surgery, more frequent ambulation and longer ambulation time three days after surgery, shorter time of defecation and exhaust, shorter hospital stay and lower hospitalization expenses. All the above differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The readmission rate, self-care ability four to seven days after surgery, pain scores 72 and 96 hours after surgery were not significantly different (P>0.05). Conclusion Multidisciplinary cooperative FTS mode for liver cancer perioperative rehabilitation can improve patients’ self-care ability, promote a speedy recovery, reduce hospitalization costs, save medical resources and improve disciplinary teamwork ability.
The concept of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS) has been well accepted by medical providers, which can be realized by a multidisciplinary team approach and minimally invasive surgical technology performed during perioperative periods. As the outcomes of the ERAS protocols, well effects are anticipated, and consistent outcomes are actually obtained. At the same time, there are some aspects which are not consistent including ① the evolution and challenge of ERAS concept:connotation and extension, ② consensus and arguments on the evaluation standard of ERAS protocol, ③ the cause of poorly compliance in medical providers and patient, ④ the function of multimodal programme and multidisciplinary team approach in ERAS protocol, which one is better? ⑤ methods and barriers of implementing enhanced recovery in clinic application.
Objective To explore the clinical effect of multidisciplinary team (MDT) in elderly patients with hip fracture under the model of close-type medical alliance. Methods The elderly patients with hip fracture treated in the Department of Orthopedics of Deyang People’s Hospital between January 2015 and December 2020 were included retrospectively. According to different treatment modes, the patients were divided into traditional mode treatment group (traditional group) and MDT mode treatment group (MDT group). The waiting time for operation, hospitalization time after operation, total hospitalization time, total hospitalization cost, and death and loss of follow-up were analyzed. Results A total of 661 patients were enrolled, including 275 in the traditional group and 386 in the MDT group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, Charlson comorbidity index, types of fracture or surgical methods (P>0.05). The waiting time for operation [5.50 (3.50, 7.50) vs. 6.00 (4.00, 6.00) d; Z=−3.473, P=0.001], hospitalization time after operation [7.44 (6.27, 8.67) vs. 8.34 (6.72, 13.70) d; Z=−4.996, P<0.001] and total hospitalization time [12.95 (10.46, 16.30) vs. 15.49 (11.77, 19.91) d; Z=−5.718, P<0.001] in the MDT group were shorter than those in the traditional group. The total hospitalization cost of the MDT group was higher than that of the traditional group, but the difference was not statistically significant [39 300 (33 400, 46 400) vs. 38 000 (31 800, 44 000) Yuan; Z=1.524, P=0.128]. There was no significant difference in the lost follow-up rate between the traditional group and the MDT group (9.82% vs. 6.48%; χ2=2.474, P=0.116). Except in-hospital mortality and 30-day postoperative mortality (P>0.05), there was significant difference between the traditional group and the MDT group in 6-month (6.45% vs. 2.77%; χ2=4.875, P=0.027) and 1-year (11.29% vs. 6.37%; χ2=4.636, P=0.031) postoperative mortality. Conclusion Under the model of close-type medical alliance, MDT can reduce the waiting time for operation, hospitalization time after operation, total hospitalization time, as well as 6-month and 1-year postoperative mortality.
ObjectiveTo investige the effects of multidisciplinary perioperative nutrition management on nutrition and postoperative complications of patients with esophageal cancer.MethodsA total of 239 patients with esophageal cancer who received elective surgical treatment were included in the study. They were divided into a trial group (120 patients) and a control group (119 patients) according to the random number table method. There were 97 males and 23 females in the trial group with an average age of 63.78±9.13 years, and 94 males and 25 females in the control group with an average age of 64.12±7.91 years. The control group received routine diet management, and the trial group received multidisciplinary perioperative nutrition management. The differences of nutrition and postoperative complications between the two groups were compared.ResultsThe total protein and albumin levels on postoperative days 3 and 7 in the trial group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05), patients' postoperative anal exhaust time was shorter than that in the control group (P<0.05), the incidence of postoperative gastrointestinal adverse reactions, lung infection, postoperative anastomotic fistula, hypoproteinemia on postoperative days 3 and 7 was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05), and hospitalization cost was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05).ConclusionMultidisciplinary nutrition management can effectively improve the nutrition of patients, promote the rapid recovery of postoperative gastrointestinal function, reduce postoperative complications, and reduce hospitalization costs. It has high clinical reference and promotion value.
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a neurological disorder characterized by an unexplained increase in intracranial pressure that primarily affects obese women of childbearing age, but individuals of any age, gender, or weight may also be affected. Its signature symptoms include disc edema, headache, visual disturbance, and throbbing tinnitus. Due to potentially serious complications, such as vision loss, accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment management are critical to improving patients' quality of life. Ophthalmologists play a key role in the treatment process, as about half of patients first visit the eye department. Diagnosis of IIH depends not only on clinical presentation, but also on the exclusion of other diseases that may cause similar symptoms, and imaging and other tests to ensure an accurate diagnosis. In order to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficiency, multidisciplinary collaborative diagnosis and treatment mode is advocated, especially in the face of patients with complex trauma or systemic diseases, which can effectively shorten the treatment time and ensure patient safety. Future research directions include establishing China's IIH epidemiological database, exploring clinical diagnosis and treatment methods and basic scientific research, aiming at forming diagnosis and treatment standards suitable for China's national conditions, improving medical level and improving patient prognosis. At the same time, a deeper understanding of the different forms of IIH will better serve the affected populations.
ObjectiveTo provide the referencefor the guideline development and revision in China, we analyzed the composition of personnel who participated in developing Chinese clinical practice guidelines (CPGs)published in 2017. MethodsCNKI, WanFang Data, CBM and Google scholar were electronically searched to collect Chinese CPGs published from January 1st to December 31st, 2017. Two researchers independently screened literatures, extracted data of interest, such as composition and distribution of personnel, and analyzed the composition of personnel with Microsoft excel 2013. ResultsA total of 54 guidelines were included, and the majority of which are for treatment. Among which, 49 were developed by the associations accounting for 90.7%. Twenty-four (44.4%) guidelines reported the geographical distribution and unit ownership of the guideline developers, such as hospitals, schools, institutions (academies, institutes, laboratories, nursing homes, etc.). Almost all of the guidelines were developed by the cooperative work of experts from multidisciplinary clinical setting, 15 (27.8%) of which mentioned the participation of the methodologist. Among which, 13 (24.1%) of them involved literature retrieval experts, 2 (3.7%) of them involved epidemiologists, 2 (3.7%) of them involved evidence-based medicine experts, 1 (1.9%) of them involved statistical expert. Three of which mentioned external peer review. None of them has systematic review team. ConclusionIn China, the CPG formulation/revision organization is still not considering the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration, methodology researchers, and patients’ participation and external evaluation teams, which will affect the quality, practicability and maneuverability of CPG. We propose that multidisciplinary cooperation should be strengthened in the future while developing CPG, giving full consideration to the importance of medical personnel and the values of patients, and promoting the application of methodology.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of multidisciplinary team (MDT) on perioperative complications and clinical efficacy of patients who were receiver radical operation to treat lung cancer by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). MethodsEighty patients in the Thoracic Surgery Department of First Hospital of Lanzhou University from December 2017 to February 2019 who were diagnosed lung cancer were divided into two groups. Forty patients in the MDT group were treated with MDT discussion. The control group consisted of 40 patients who were treated without MDT discussion. The incidence of postoperative complications and clinical efficacy were compared between the two groups . ResultsThere was no statistical difference in incision infection, atelectasis, pleural effusion and pulmonary leakage between the two groups. However, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection (5% vs. 20%, P=0.043) and the overall postoperative complications (17.5% vs. 42.5%, P=0.015) in the MDT group was lower than that in the control group with a statistical difference. In the MDT group, the operative time (140.3±8.0 min vs. 148.8±6.8 min, P<0.001), intraoperative bleeding ( 207.8±19.4 mL vs. 222.0±28.3 mL, P=0.010), lymph node dissection number (25.1±6.2 vs. 20.1±7.0, P=0.001), postoperative drainage (273.0±33.5 mL vs. 24.0±52.5 mL, P<0.001), drainage duration (81.9±6.1 h vs. 85.3±8.1 h, P=0.039), pain on the first day after surgery (4.6±0.7 vs. 5.4±0.7), P<0.001), pain on the second day (2.5±0.7 vs. 3.0±0.8, P=0.002), pain on the third day (1.1±0.8 vs. 1.5±0.6, P=0.014), postoperative activity time (40.7±6.7 h vs. 35.3±7.1 h, P<0.001), postoperative recovery time (6.8±0.9 d vs. 7.4±0.7 d, P=0.003), patient satisfaction (8.1±1.4 vs. 7.2±2.0, P=0.020) were significantly better than those of the control group with statistical differences. But there was no statistical difference in the conversion to thoracotomy between the two group. ConclusionMDT discussion can reduce the surgical risk and postoperative complications, improve the clinical efficacy and accelerate the postoperative rehabilitation of patients, which has a good clinical significance.
Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is one of the main causes of hospitalized patients with diabetic foot. DFI should be diagnosed according to the clinical manifestations, and the severity of infection should be graded in time. Diabetic foot wounds are mostly chronic wounds, and there are many kinds of bacterial infections. The bacteria and antibiotics resistance will change with the progress of the disease. Bacterial biofilm is also one of the important causes of antibiotic resistance. Reasonable and timely surgical treatment combined with effective antibiotic treatment is an effective measure to deal with the challenge of DFI. On this basis, multidisciplinary cooperation will achieve the best clinical outcome.