【 Abstract 】 Objective To discuss incidence of the complications in the rectal cancer patients ’ early postoperative being treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with surgical intervention. Methods The rectal cancer patients under surgical therapy being diagnosed definitely, with neoadjuvant chemotherapy under multi-disciplinary team (MDT) or without and firstly being discovered from April to October of 2007 were studied. The complication conditions of these patients 1 month after operation were studied and observed, and the differences between MDT group and non-MDT group were compared. Results According to the condition, 189 rectal cancer patients were internalized. Among all the patients, the distance of tumor to the dentate line were lt;3 cm 38 cases, 3 ～ 7 cm 86 cases, ≥ 7 cm 65 cases; pathological stage were Ⅰ stage 5 cases ， Ⅱstage 122 cases， Ⅲstage 50 cases， Ⅳstage 12 cases. There were 181 cases laparotomy, 8 cases laparoscopic operation; 33 cases stoma operation, 156 cases non-stoma operation. The total incidence of postoperative complication was 27.0% （51/189）. Of all, incision bleeding was 1 case, abdominal (deep) bleeding were 4 cases, anastomosis bleeding were 5 cases, pulmonary infection was 1 case, wound infection were 7 cases, urinary tract infection were 3 cases, abdominal (deep) infection was 1 case, unknown fever were 19 cases, superficial layer wound dehiscence was 1 case, wound co-liquation were 15 cases, anastomosis leakage were 3 cases, rectovaginal fistula were 2 cases; intestinal obstruction were 7 cases, urinary retention were 7 cases, stress ulcer were 2 cases. Follow-up in 2-10 months after operation, there was no death case. The baseline between MDT group and non-MDT group was equal. The ratio of postoperative blood transfusion of MDT group was obviously less than that of non-MDT group （P＜0.05）. Moreover, the operation time of MDT group was obviously shorter than that of non-MDT group, and the difference was statistically significant （P＜0.05）. But the ratio of laparotomy and laparoscopic operation, of stoma operation and non-stoma operation, as well as the types of radical excision operation of rectal cancer didn’t show any statistical difference between two groups (Pgt;0.05). The postoperative venting time, defecation time, intake time didn’t show any statistical difference between two groups too. But the postoperative out-of-bed activity time and the postoperative in-hospital days of MDT group was obviously shorter than that of non-MDT group, and the difference was statistically significant （P＜0.05）. In MDT group the postoperative total complication rate was less than non-MDT group, and the difference was statistically significant （P＜0.05）. Among all the complications, the MDT group had a lower rate of wound infection, wound co-liquation and urinary retention （P＜0.05）. Using multifactorial logistic regression analysis, the risk factor which influenced the postoperative complication rate in MDT group were: postoperative intake time and postoperative hospitalization time. But the risk factor in non-MDT group was only according to postoperative hospitalization time. Conclusion The patients who were treated by MDT, definite operative method combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy or not didn’t increase the postoperative complication rate and risk. So it could be believed that such a composite treatment was feasible and safe in early postoperative stage. But it needs further studies to evaluate the medium- and long-term clinical effect.
Objective To study the long-term effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on advanced breast cancer. Methods The CAF neoadjuvant chemotherapy 〔CTX 500 mg/m2（1st day, 8th day), 5-FU 500 mg/m2（1st day, 8th day), and ADM 30 mg/m2 (1st day) every 3 weeks〕 was carried out in 31 breast cancer patients (stageⅢ,Ⅳ) for 2 cycles before operation, compared with 30 patients (stage Ⅲa) whose therapies were never done and operations could be feasible. Results The overall response rate was 87.1%(27/31). The stages of 19 patients among 31 (61.3%) declined (6 patients to stage Ⅲa, 8 to stageⅡb, 4 to stageⅡa, 1 to stage 0, 1 to complete response and none to pathological complete response). The diseasefree survival time of the patients was 56.3 months which was obviously longer than that of the patients without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (43.5 months, P＜0.05). The 5-year diseasefree survival rate of the patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 38.7% which was a little higher than that (33.3%) of the patients without the chemotherapy, and the two groups had no significant difference. Conclusion The neoadjuvant chemotherapy can reduce the stages of patients with advanced breast cancer, obviously prolong the diseasefree survival time of patients, and reduce or delay recurrence or metastasis.
ObjectiveTo study the latest progress of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. MethodsLiteratures of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer, involving with theoretical basis, clinical significance, indications, drugs, predictors, and its relationship of breastconserving surgery, sentinel lymph node biopsy were reviewed. ResultsNeoadjuvant chemotherapy could reduce the clinical stage, increase opportunity of breast-conserving surgery, learn the sensitivity of drugs, prevent distant metastases, but the impact of the sentinel lymph node biopsy was still in dispute. ConclusionNeoadjuvant chemotherapy is an important part of a systemic treatment for breast cancer, but how to select sensitive drugs, develop individualized treatment programs and forecast the outcome needs further study.
Objective To investigate the advances and clinical efficacy evaluation method on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer. Methods Literatures on the advances and clinical efficacy evaluation method on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer were reviewed and analyzed. The agreement between computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) and the results of histopathology and survival was analyzed.Results CT and EUS were the method of efficacy evaluation commonly used at present, but the evaluation indexes and criteria were controversial, and the criteria for solid tumors seemed to be not feasible for gastric cancer. Diffusionweighted imaging (DWI) method needed more investigation, while PET held advantage in early selection of patients without response accurately.Conclusion There is no uniform standard for clinical efficacy evaluation yet, so an integration of diverse imaging methods may be the best choice to improve the accuracy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium (S-1) combined with surgery in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.MethodsWe searched EMbase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data from inception to February 2017, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing S-1 combined with surgery in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 11 RCTs involving 971 advanced gastric cancer patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing S-1 combined with surgery group was superior to the control group in R0 resection rate (OR=2.75, 95%CI 1.91 to 3.95, P<0.000 01), 2 year survival rate (OR=1.72, 95%CI 1.01 to 2.93, P=0.05) and 3 year survival rate (OR=1.64, 95%CI 1.12 to 2.41, P=0.01), while there were no statistical differences in response rate (OR=1.33, 95%CI 0.70 to 2.51, P=0.39), 1 year survival rate (OR=1.50, 95%CI 0.64 to 3.53, P=0.35) and the incidence of postoperative complications (OR=1.00, 95%CI 0.66 to 1.51, P=0.98).ConclusionNeoadjuvant chemotherapy containing S-1 combined with surgery can improve the R0 resection rate, 2-year survival rate and 3-year survival rate without increase postoperative complications rate. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo evaluate clinical effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with laparoscopic gastrectomy in treatment of local advanced gastric cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of 24 patients with local advanced gastric cancer undergoing 2 courses of FLEEOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy from July 2012 to July 2015 were analyzed. The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on radiographic results was evaluated. The gastrectomy was performed on week 2 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were treated with XELOX regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy after laparoscopic gastrectomy. Results① Complete response occurred in 4 cases (16.6%), partial response in 18 cases (75.0%), stable disease in 1 case (4.2%), disease progressive in 1 case (4.2%). The total effective rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 91.6% (22/24). ② The serum tumor markers CEA, CA19-9, and CA125 levels after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were significantly lower than those before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001) and reached normal levels. ③ Two courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and laparoscopic exploration were completed successfully in these 24 patients. Two patients with intraabdominal metastasis were underwent palliative gastrojejunostomy, the other 22 patients were underwent laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy. The operative time was (236±45) min, the intraoperative blood loss was (150±50) mL, the number of lymph node dissected was 17.4 ± 5.3, the postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery time was (3.1±0.8) d. ④ There was no death due to surgery. One case suffered anastomotic leakage, 1 case intestinal obstruction, and 1 case pulmonary infection after surgery. The postoperative complications were cured by conservative treatment. ⑤ The haematological adverse events included anemia (9 patients), leukopenia (14 patients), thrombocytopenia (8 patients), aminotransferase abnormality (5 in elevated ALT, 6 in elevated AST), the most common toxicity was nausea (19 patients), 10 patients suffered nerve toxicity. All the patients were relieved after treatment. ⑥ The patients were followed up for 4-39 months, 1 case died of cachexia as the result of extensive abdominal metastasis, 1 case died of liver failure as the result of multiple liver metastases, 1 case was death as the result of brain metastasis, 1 case was death as the result of the other cause, the other 20 patients were alive. ConclusionsThe preliminary results of limited cases in this study show that FLEEOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with laparoscopic gastrectomy for local advanced gastric cancer is safe and effective. It has advantages of minimal invasion and fast recovery.
Objective To explore the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on postoperative risk of colorectal cancer by use of estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress （E-PASS）. Methods A total of 161 patients with colorectal cancer according to the inclusion criteria from January 2009 to December 2009 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University were analyzed retrospectively，who were assigned to neoadjuvant chemotherapy group （NC group, 78 patients） and non-NC group （83 patients）. The postoperative risk of each group was assessed by the E-PASS scale including preoperative risk score （PRS），surgical stress score （SSS），and comprehensive risk score （CRS）. Results The baseline of two groups had no significant difference （P＞0.05）. The postoperative complication incidence of two groups had no significant difference either （P＞0.05）， which was 10.26% （8/78） in the NC group，and 7.23% （6/83） in the non-NC group. The PRS was 78.42 in the NC group and 83.42 in the non-NC group （P=0.497）. The SSS was 80.77 in the NC group and 81.22 in the non-NC group （P=0.951）. The CRS was 80.74 in the NC group and 81.24 in the non-NC group （P=0.976）. The accuracy of the postoperative risk assessment was 70 cases and 78 cases in the NC group and non-NC group，respectively. There was no significant difference of accuracy between two groups （P=0.325）. Conclusions Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not increase the risk of patients with colorectal cancer after operation，and the results suggest that E-PASS scale can provide a more accurate assessment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with surgical risk.
Objective To analyze the influence factors of amenorrhea in premenopausal breast cancer women treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the relationship of neoadjuvant chemotherapy-related amenorrhea （NCRA） to down-staging of tumor. Methods Two hundred and twenty-four premenopausal breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy from March 2006 to March 2011 in this hospital were investigated retrospectively. The effects of age， chemotherapy regiment， ER/PR status， Her-2 status， and tamoxifen （TAM） on NCRA and recovery of menstru-ation were assessed. The average age of the patients who had accepted different chemotherapy cycles when NCRA occurred was described， and the effect of different chemotherapy cycles on recovery of menstruation was evaluated. Tumor volume change was estimated to analysis the relation between NCRA and tumor response to chemotherapy. Results One hundred and sixty-six （74.11%） cases occurred NCRA， 40 （26.49%） cases returned to normal menstruation apart from 15 cases who had accepted oophorectomy or the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog goserelin before menstrual status change. The results of univariate analysis and multivariate analysis indicated that the NCRA and menstruation recovery were both related to age at diagnosis （P＜0.001，P=0.001）， and only menstruation recovery was related to chemotherapy regiments （P＜0.001）. However， the NCRA and menstruation recovery were not related to ER/PR status， Her-2 status，and TAM （P＞0.05）. Chemotherapy cycles when NCRA occurred decreased with the increase of age， and wasn’t assoc-iated with menstruation recovery （P＞0.05）. There was no correlation between NCRA and downstage of tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy （P＞0.05）. Conclusions Amenorrhea resulted from neoadjuvant chemotherapy in most of breast cancer patients， which occurs more commonly in elder ones with less chemotherapy cycles. Quite a few patients resume menses after NCRA， which is associated with age and chemotherapy regiments. NCRA doesn’t influence tumor response to chemotherapy.
Objectives To systematically review the efficacy and safety of TE regimen versus CEF regimen for Chinese women with ⅡA to ⅢC stage breast cancer. Methods Databases including PubMed, EMbase, VIP, CNKI, WanFang Data and CBM were electronically searched from inception to December 2016 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCT) on TE regimen versus CEF regimen for Chinese women with ⅡA to ⅢC stage breast cancer. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 14 RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: the complete remission rate (CR) (RR=1.73, 95%CI 1.35 to 2.22, P<0.000 1) and clinical efficacy rate (RR) (RR=1.31, 95%CI 1.22 to 1.42,P<0.000 01) of the TE group were superior to those of the CEF group. But there were no significant differences between two groups in cardiac toxicity, myelosuppression and gastrointestinal reactions. Conclusions TE regimen is superior to CEF regimen in terms of efficacy for the Chinese women with ⅡA to ⅢC stage breast cancer, and there is no difference between the incidence of adverse reactions. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. MethodThe literatures about the research progress of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the advanced gastric cancer were reviewed. ResultsThe neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the advanced gastric cancer could significantly improve the R0 resection rate, improve the long-term survival rate, and reduce the risk of death.The course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer without distant metastasis generally was 6-9 weeks, and then according to the results of the curative effect evaluation to decide whether to undergo surgery treatment.Further the clinical research and improvement of chemotherapy sensitivity detection method were helpful to the unity of the standard of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. ConclusionsThe curative effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer is clear.But there is no uniform standard on such as indications, chemotherapy regimens, medication time, and curative effect evaluation index, and so on.It is still needed the further research of multicenter and large clinical trials.