Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of different dual antiplatelet therapies in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods Such databases as The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMbase, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data were searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies on the effectiveness and safety of dual antiplatelet therapies both short-duration (≤6 months) and long-duration (gt;6 months) after percutaneous coronary intervention. The literature was screened according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria by two reviewers independently, the quality was evaluated, the data were extracted, and meta-analyses were performed by using RevMan 5.1 software. Results Eight trials were included, of which 3 were RCTs involving 7 475 patients, and 5 were observational studies involving 12 744 patients. Meta-analyses on RCTs showed that the incidence of death or myocardial infarction in the long-duration treatment group was lower than that of the short-duration treatment group (OR=0.74, 95%CI 0.56 to 0.98, Plt;0.000 1), while meta-analyses on observation studies showed the similar result (OR=0.7, 95%CI 0.45 to 1.08, P=0.11). With the variables of published year and follow-up time, the heterogeneity of cohort studies was discussed through meta-regression (Z=3.61, P=0.000) which indicated that both published year and follow-up time might be the source of heterogeneity due to their contribution. For RCTs, the incidence of severe bleeding events in the short-duration treatment group was lower than that in the long-duration treatment group (OR=1.29, 95%CI 0.99 to 1.69, P=0.06). For observational studies, the incidence of late stent thrombosis in the long-duration treatment group was lower than that in the short-duration treatment group (OR=0.40, 95%CI 0.15 to 1.07, P=0.07). Conclusion The long duration (gt;6months) of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention can reduce the incidence of death or myocardial infarction and decrease the tendency of late stent thrombosis, but cannot obviously increase the incidence rate of severe bleeding events. The current evidence shows no marked superiority in longer duration (gt;12months) of dual antiplatelet therapy.
ObjectiveTo summarize our experience of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for the treatment of coronary accidents during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). MethodsFrom January 2011 to January 2013, 30 patients with coronary accidents during PCI from our hospital and other hospitals received surgical treatment in Xinhua Hospital, Medical School of Shanghai Jiaotong University. There were 21 male and 9 female patients with their age of 68±11 (54-84) years. Coronary accidents included coronary artery dissection in 12 patients, coronary artery perforation in 12 patients, acute in-stent thrombosis in 2 patients, dilation balloon rupture in 1 patient and balloon retention in 1 patient, and PCI guidewire retention in 2 patients. Among the 30 patients, 8 patients received intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) implantation preoperatively. All the patients underwent emergency CABG, including 29 patients undergoing off-pump CABG and 1 patient undergoing CABG on pump with heart beating. The patients' medical history, PCI and surgical records were retrospectively reviewed, and surgical treatment strategies, clinical outcomes and prognosis were summarized. ResultsThe average number of grafts was 2.8±0.4. Postoperative length of ICU stay was 8.3±4.8 days, and mean hospital stay was 20.3±15.2 days. Postoperative complications included low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) in 3 patients, tracheotomy in 2 patients, acute renal failure requiring continuous renal replacement therapy in 2 patients, and reexploration for bleeding in 1 patient. Twenty-eight were discharged, 1 patient died of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome caused by LCOS, and another patient died of refractory ventricular fibrillation. A total of 26 patients were followed up for 10.2±8.3 months and 1 patient died of stroke during the following up. ConclusionEmergency CABG can restore coronary artery blood flow quickly and provide good results for coronary accidents during PCI.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of triple antiplatelet therapy (TAT:aspirin, clopidogrel and cilostazol) for patients with coronary heart diseases after percutaneous coronary intervention. MethodsSuch databases as The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2014), PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were electronically searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of TAT for patients with coronary heart diseases after percutaneous coronary intervention from inception to February 2014. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 15 RCTs involved 6 980 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:a) the DAT group (DAT:aspirin and clopidogrel) and the TAT group were similar in non-fatal myocardial infarction (OR=0.72, 95%CI 0.47 to 1.10, P=0.05), stroke (OR=0.66, 95%CI 0.38 to 1.16, P=0.15), and hemorrhage (OR=1.03, 95%CI 0.74 to 1.44, P=0.85) with no significant difference; b) the TAT group was superior to the DAT group in reducing the incidences of the major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (OR=0.50, 95%CI 0.39 to 0.65, P < 0.000 01), cardiac death (OR=0.53, 95%CI 0.33 to 0.84, P=0.007), stent thrombosis (OR=0.52, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.99, P=0.05), target vessel revascularization (OR=0.63, 95%CI 0.51 to 0.76, P < 0.000 01), and target lesion revascularization (OR=0.44, 95%CI 0.28 to 0.70, P=0.000 6); and c) no significant difference was found between the two groups in the incidences of thrombocytopenia, leucopenia, and liver damage. The DAT group was superior to the TAT group in gastrointestinal reaction, palpitations, headache, and skin rashes between the two groups, with significant differences. ConclusionTAT therapy has good efficacy and safety in the treatment of patients with coronary heart diseases after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Objective To systematically review the angiographic predictors of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods The PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, WanFang Data, and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect observational studies on the angiographic predictors of CTO-PCI from inception to December 18, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Results A total of 36 studies were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the angiographic predictors of CTO-PCI included calcification (OR=1.92, 95%CI 1.49 to 2.47, P<0.01), occlusion length≥20mm (OR=1.80, 95%CI 1.26 to 2.57, P<0.01), bending>45° (OR=2.19, 95%CI 1.56 to 3.08, P<0.01), blunt stump (OR=1.53, 95%CI 1.08 to 2.16, P<0.01), ostial lesions (OR=2.27, 95%CI 1.34 to 3.85, P<0.01), proximal cap ambiguity (OR=2.27, 95%CI 1.40 to 3.68, P<0.01), side branch at proximal cap (OR=1.65, 95%CI 1.27 to 2.16, P<0.01), and J-CTO score≥3 (OR=2.53, 95%CI 1.53 to 4.16, P<0.01). Conclusion Current evidence indicates that calcification, occlusion length ≥20mm, bending>45°, blunt stump, ostial lesions, proximal cap ambiguity, side branch at proximal cap, and J-CTO score≥3 are the angiographic predictors of CTO-PCI. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and security through meta-analysis of a comprehensive study of efficacy of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus drug-eluting stent percutaneous coronary intervention (DES-PCI), for diabetes mellitus with multi-vessel coronary disease. Methods Databases including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP were searched from their establishment dates to 2010. Published information and conference papers including references were handsearched. Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on diabetic patients with coronary multi-vessel disease treated with revascularization were collected and screened by two reviewers independently. After data extraction and quality assessment of the included studies, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0. Results A total of eight studies involving a total of 3 689 cases (CABG group: 1 814 cases; DES-PCI group: 1 875 cases) were included. Results of meta-analyses showed that: compared with the DES-PCI group, the CABG group could significantly reduce postoperative repeat revascularization rate (OR=0.27, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.69, P=0.006) and major cardio-cerebral vascular events (OR=0.49, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.62, Plt;0.000 01). But in reducing mortality rate (OR=0.84, 95%CI 0.64 to 1.10, P=0.21), cerebrovascular events (OR=2.00, 95%CI 0.97 to 4.14, P=0.06) and myocardial infarction incidence rate (OR=0.92, 95%CI 0.53 to 1.59, P=0.75), there were no significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion CABG is superior to DES-PCI in the treatment of diabetic patients with multi-vessel disease. However, due to the limitation of the quality and quantity of the included studies, the above conclusion should be tested by conducting more large-scale, multi-center and prospective RCTs in future.
ObjectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of four antiplatelet regimens after coronary drug-eluting stents by network meta-analysis.MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase and Web of Science databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the comparison of different antiplatelet regimens after coronary drug-eluting stenting from inception to December 31st, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk bias of included studies. Network meta-analysis was then performed by using Gemtc14.3 software, Stata16.0 software and RevMan5.3 software.ResultsA total of 23 RCTs involving 45 837 patients were included. The results of network meta-analysis showed that: in terms of prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) recurrence, the aspirin monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy was inferior to the triple antiplatelet therapy (OR=2.13, 95%CI 1.08 to 4.03). In terms of reducing the incidence of ischemic compound events, the triple antiplatelet therapy was superior to the standard dual antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.53, 95%CI 0.39 to 0.72), the aspirin monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.49, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.69) and the P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.51, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.73). There was no statistically significant difference among the four interventions in reducing the rate of in-stent thrombosis and all-cause mortality (P>0.05). In terms of safety, the bleeding rate of aspirin monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy was lower than that of standard dual antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.70, 95%CI 0.55 to 0.86) and triple antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.58, 95%CI 0.36 to 0.90), and the bleeding rate of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy was also lower than that of standard dual antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.51, 95%CI 0.39 to 0.65) and triple antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.43, 95%CI 0.26 to 0.67). The probability ranking diagram showed that: in terms of the recurrence rate of MI, the rate of in-stent thrombosis and the incidence of ischemic compound events, triple antiplatelet therapy was the lowest and aspirin monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy was the highest. However, in terms of all-cause mortality and bleeding rate, aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy was the lowest and triple antiplatelet therapy was the highest.ConclusionsThe available evidence suggests that when the risk of ischemia is low, we should choose aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy, and P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy may have a lower risk of ischemia and bleeding. When the risk of ischemia is high and bleeding is low, the triple or standard dual antiplatelet therapy should be selected, and the efficacy of triple antiplatelet therapy is superior, while the safety may be inferior.
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of triple-antiplatelet treatment based on Cilostazol for restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2009), PubMed (1966 to 2009), EMbase (1974 to 2009), CNKI (1994 to 2009), CBM (1978 to Feb. 2009), VIP (1989 to Feb. 2009), and CMD Digital Periodicals (1998 to 2009). Two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of the included studies and extracted the data. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2 348 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that triple-antiplatelet treatment based on Cilostazol could increase minimum lumen diameter (MD=0.31, 95%CI 0.11 to 0.51) and decrease restenosis rate (OR=0.49, 95%CI 0.37 to 0.65). In addition, it could decrease death rate (OR=0.52, 95%CI 0.31 to 0.88), but it could not change target-vessel revascularization, stroke rate, palpitation rate, and the rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebral events and major adverse cardiac events. Conclusion Evidence shows that triple-antiplatelet treatment based on Cilostazol could increase minimum lumen diameter and decrease restenosis rate and death rate. Their clinical application is worthy to be advocated.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via radial access versus via femoral access for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the clinical efficacy and safety of radial access for PCI in patients with acute STEMI were searched in PubMed, EMbase, CBM, The Cochrane Library (Issue 6, 2014), CNKI, VIP, and WanFang Data from 2000 to November 2014. Literature screening according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, data extraction and methodological quality assessment of included studies were completed by two reviewers independently. Then meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of fourteen RCTs involving 5 212 patients were enrolled. The results indicated that:a) radial access was associated with decreased risks of mortality (OR=0.54, 95%CI 0.40 to 0.74, P=0.000 1); decreased incidences of major bleeding (OR=0.50, 95%CI 0.34 to 0.74, P=0.000 8), major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (OR=0.65, 95%CI 0.50 to 0.83, P=0.000 6), and puncture site complications (OR=0.35, 95%CI 0.25 to 0.49, P < 0.000 01); and decreased hospital duration (MD=-2.14, 95%CI-3.97 to-0.31, P=0.002). b) However, the two groups were alike in the success rate of operation, exposure time of X ray, risk of stroke, and the rate of CABG. PCI via radial access took more operation time than that via femoral access, and PCI via radial access had a higher incidence of changing puncture access. ConclusionFor acute STEMI patients undergoing PCI, radial access could significantly reduce mortality, and incidences of major bleeding, MACE and puncture site complications. Therefore, under the conditions of strict indication control and increased operation skills, PCI via radial access is effective and safe in the treatment of acute STEMI. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more large-scale, multi-centre, high quality RCTs are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effect of compound Danshen dripping pills combined with Western medicine on inflammatory factors and cardiac function after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction.MethodsDatabases including CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM, PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase and The Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials of compound Danshen dripping pills combined with Western medicine in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction after PCI. The retrieval time was from the establishment of the databases to June 11th, 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk bias of included studies. RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 16 studies were included, involving 2 069 patients. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the combination of compound Danshen dripping pills could increase the left ventricular ejection fraction (MD =−4.74, 95%CI 4.07 to 5.42, P<0.01), decrease the B-type natriuretic peptide (SMD=−3.81, 95%CI −5.06 to −2.57, P<0.01), the level of interleukin-6 (SMD=−3.20, 95%CI −4.54 to −1.86, P<0.01) and level of tumor necrosis factor-a (SMD=−4.96, 95%CI −7.03 to −2.89, P<0.01).ConclusionsCurrent evidence suggests that the combination of compound Danshen dropping pills has potential benefits in inhibiting inflammation and improving cardiac function after PCI. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusions.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in left main coronary artery disease. MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies on the efficacy and safety of IVUS and coronary angiography-guided PCI in left main coronary artery disease from inception to March, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies; then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 7 studies involving 7 777 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with PCI guided by coronary angiography, the incidence of cardiac death (OR=0.45, 95%CI 0.34 to 0.61, P<0.000 01), myocardial infarction (OR=0.67, 95%CI 0.53 to 0.84, P=0.004), major adverse cardiovascular events (OR=0.46, 95%CI 0.34 to 0.61, P<0.000 01), total deaths (OR=0.54, 95%CI 0.44 to 0.67, P<0.000 01), and in-stent thrombosis (OR=0.28, 95%CI 0.18 to 0.45, P<0.000 01) occurred in PCI guided by IVUS were lower. The differences were statistically significant. However, there were no statistical significance in the incidence of target revascularization in PCI (OR=0.80, 95%CI 0.40 to 1.61, P=0.54) and revascularization of target lesions (OR=0.68, 95%CI 0.36 to 1.27, P=0.23) between two groups.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that the IVUS-guided PCI can decrease the incidence of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, MACEs, stent thrombosis, total death and has no effect on target lesion revascularization and target vessel revascularization. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion.