Objective To summarize the effect and complication of treatment for Pilon fracture using limited internal fixation combined with external fixation. Methods From April 1996 to June 2003, 20 patients with Pilon fracture were treated with limited internal fixation combined with external fixation as the treatment group and 22 patients with Pilon fracture with other methods as the control group. The X-ray films, clinical effect and complication were analyzed and compared between 2 groups. Results All cases were followed up for 8 to 26 months(15.2 months on average). According to Helfet’s criterion forclinical effect, the excellent and good rates were 75% in the treatment group and 72.7%in the control group, being no significant difference (Pgt;0.05). According to Burwell-charnley criterion for reduction, the X-ray film resultsshowed the excellent and good rates were 90% in the treatment group and 86.4% in the control group, being no significant difference (Pgt;0.05). But there was significant difference in complications between 2 groups (Plt;0.05). Conclusion Limited internal fixation combined with external fixation is better in resuming ankle joint function and remarkably reducing complication, especially in reducing soft tissue complication and collapse of bone joint; it is useful in the treatment of Pilon fracture.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effect of surgical treatment of Pilon fractures accompanied with fibula fractures with the improved double operative approaches. MethodsBetween January 2012 and June 2015, 19 patients with closed Pilon fractures accompanied with fibula fractures (Rüedi-Allgöwer type Ⅲ) underwent open reduction and internal fixation with improved anterior-median incision and posterior-lateral incision. There were 13 males and 6 females, aged 35 years on average (range, 23-68 years). Injury was caused by traffic accident in 11 cases, falling from height in 7 cases, and crash injury of heavy object in 1 case. According to AO/OTA classification, there were 4 cases of type C2, and 15 cases of type C3. According to Tscherne-Gotzen classification of soft tissue defect, 6 cases were rated as grade 1 and 13 cases as grade 2. The interval of injury and operation was 6-18 days (mean, 10.3 days). After operation, reduction of Pilon fracture was evaluated by the Burwell-Charnley radiological evaluation criteria, and the ankle joint function was evaluated by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score. ResultsThe operation time was 1.8-4.6 hours (mean, 2.4 hours); the intraoperative blood loss was 200-500 mL (mean, 310 mL). All the 19 patients were followed up for 13.7 months on average (range, 12-18 months). The fracture healing time was 3.6 months on average (range, 2.5-8.0 months). Postoperative complications included anterior-median incision necrosis in 2 cases, traumatic arthritis in 2 cases, and ankle instability in 1 case. According to Burwell-Charnley radiological evaluation criteria, anatomical reduction was obtained in 15 cases and satisfactory reduction in 4 cases. According to AOFAS score, the excellent and good rate was 84.2% (excellent in 11 cases, good in 5 cases, and fair in 3 cases). ConclusionThe improved anterior-median incision combined with posterior-lateral incision is a safe and effective method to treat complex Pilon fractures accompanied with fibula fractures, which has the advantages of simple operation, adequate exposure and minimal invasion.
Objective By comparing with traditional L-shaped plate, to explore the effectiveness of new Pilon plate in the treatment of type C Pilon fracture.Methods A clinical data of 57 patients with type C Pilon fractures who met the selection criteria between May 2018 and January 2020 was analyzed retrospectively. Thirty-two patients were treated with new Pilon plate (trial group) and 25 patients with traditional L-shaped plate (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, fracture side and type, the interval between injury and operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time and complications of the two groups were recorded. X-ray films were taken after operation to assess the quality of fracture reduction according to the Burwell-Charnley classification and fracture healing. Ankle function was evaluated according to Johner-Wruhs scoring standard and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score.Results The operations of the two groups were completed successfully, and the operation time of the trial group was significantly shorter than that of the control group (t=–3.025, P=0.005). After operation, the incision necrosis occurred in 2 cases of the control group, and the incisions of other patients in both groups healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 8-16 months, with an average of 10.1 months. There was no significant difference in follow-up time between the two groups (t=0.433, P=0.667). X-ray films showed that the ankle reduction of the trial group was rated as excellent in 28 cases and good in 4 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 100%, while in the control group, the ankle reduction was rated as excellent in 15 cases, good in 5 cases, and fair in 5 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 80.0%. There was a significant difference in the excellent and good rate of fracture reduction between the two groups (Z=–2.565, P=0.010). The fracture healed in both groups, and the healing time was (16.59±3.78) weeks in the trial group and (17.80±3.81) weeks in the control group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (t=–1.191, P=0.239). At last follow-up, according to Johner-Wruhs scoring standard, the ankle joint function in the trial group was evaluated as excellent in 25 cases and good in 7 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 100%; the AOFAS score was 90.9±4.5. In the control group, 16 cases were excellent, 5 cases were good, and 4 cases were fair, and the excellent and good rate was 84.0%; the AOFAS score was 85.2±10.0. The ankle function scores of the trial group was superior to that of the control group (P<0.05). During follow-up, except for 1 case of ankle traumatic arthritis in the control group, there was no complication such as ankle malunion, plate loosening and fracture, or fracture reduction loss in both groups.Conclusion Compared with the traditional L-shaped plate, the new Pilon plate in the treatment of type C Pilon fracture has the advantages of high reduction quality, reliable fixation, less irritation to soft tissue, high fracture healing rate, and satisfactory functional recovery of ankle joint.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation by posterolateral and posteromedial approaches for treating posterior Pilon fractures in elderly patients. MethodsBetween August 2009 and August 2014, 20 elderly patients with posterior Pilon fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation by posterolateral and posteromedial approaches. There were 14 males and 6 females, aged from 66 to 83 years (mean, 72.7 years). The causes were falling injury in 11 cases and traffic accident injury in 9 cases. All the patients had lateral malleolus and medial malleolus fractures. The time from injury to operation was 7-14 days (mean, 8.6 days). The posterolateral incision was made to expose the posterolateral bone fragments of posterior malleolus and lateral malleolus fracture, and the posteromedial incision was made to expose the posteromedial fracture fragments of posterior malleolus and medial malleolus fracture. After reduction, fracture was fixed with locking plate or cannulated screw. All the patients began to functional exercise at 1 day after operation. ResultsThe operation time was 60-110 minutes (mean, 92 minutes). The incisions healed primarily in all patients. There were no complications of incision dehiscence, infection, implant exposure, and nerve damage. No irritation sign of tendon was observed. All 20 cases were followed up for 12-18 months (mean, 13 months). The X-ray films showed that fracture healed at 3-9 months, with an average of 5.2 months. During follow-up period, no loosening or breakage of the implant was observed. The other patients could walk normally except 2 patients (over 80 years old) who could walk with crutch. According to American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, the results were excellent in 12 cases, good in 4 cases, and fair in 4 cases; the excellent and good rate was 80%. ConclusionA combination of posterolateral approach and posteromedial approach for open reduction and fixation of posterior Pilon fractures can achieve satisfactory effect in elderly patients. It has the advantages of protecting ankle blood supply and avoiding the soft tissue necrosis and implants exposure.