The experience on management of abnormal blood vessels in 128 cases of donor kidney during the tailoring operation was reported. The various techniques used for different types of abnormal arteries and veins, and the critical points which should be paid attention to have been discussed. It was concluded that the multiple renal arteries should be treated in a single renal artery and anastomosed with internal iliac artery or/and external iliac artery. The appropriate management given to abnormal renal blood vessels during the tailoring operation may shorten the warm ishemia time, ensure the renal blood supply, reduce the renal vasular complication, and promote the recovery of renal function.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) versus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in kidney transplant recipients. MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMbase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library (Issue 9, 2013), CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data from their inception to November 2013, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of EC-MPS versus MMF in kidney transplant recipients. References of included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened studies according to the exclusion and inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsA total of 8 RCTs involving 2 400 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant differences between the two groups at the end of 4-week, 6-month, 12-month and 48-month follow-up in the acute rejection rate (4-weeks:RR=0.33, 95%CI 0.01 to 8.05; 6 months:RR=0.94, 95%CI 0.73 to 1.22; 12 months:RR=0.88, 95%CI 0.63 to 1.24; 4 years:RR=0.93, 95%CI 0.47 to 1.84). There were no significant differences between the two groups at the end of 6-month and 12-month follow-up in the chronic rejection rate (6 month:RR=0.66, 95%CI 0.27 to 1.58; 12 month:RR=0.57, 95%CI 0.29 to 1.15). There were no significant differences between the two groups at the end of 6-month, 12-month and 48-month follow-up in the graft loss or death rate (6-month:RR=0.79, 95%CI 0.41 to 1.50; 12-month:RR=0.76, 95%CI 0.40 to 1.43; 48-month:RR=1.38, 95%CI 0.59 to 3.23). As to the side effect, EC-MPS could significantly reduce the risk of pneumonia compared with MMF (RR=0.32, 95%CI 0.13 to 0.79). ConclusionBased on current evidences, EC-MPS is comparable with MMF for renal transplant patients in short-term effectiveness, and the incidence of pneumonia in the EC-MPS group is lower than the MMF group. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the studies, the conclusions should be validated by more high quality studies.
ObjectiveTo investigate the diagnosis, clinical features, treatment and outcome of pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) caused by human parvovirus B19 (HPV-B19) infection in kidney recipients. Method The clinical courses of six patients with PRCA caused by HPV-B19 infection after renal transplantation in West China Hospital between May 2018 and April 2019 were retrospectively investigated. Results The six patients showed obvious anemia symptoms, lacking rash, joint pain and other clinical symptoms of viral infection. The hemoglobin level of five patients got totally remission from a course of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatment, and anemia symptoms like fatigue, weakness got notable improvement. One patient had no improvement after two courses of IVIG treatment, and his anemia was significantly improved after the third IVIG course combined with immunosuppressant conversion(from tacrolimus to cyclosporine), and one patient with recurrence accepted a repeated course of IVIG treatment and obtained remission of severe anemia again. The median time of reticulocyte firstly rose to above 0.084×1012/L from the day of IVIG treatment ended was 3.50 (1.25, 5.00) days, and the median time required for a 30 g/L increase in hemoglobin to the end of IVIG treatment was 16.00 (9.25, 31.25) days. No serious adverse reactions occurred and all patients had stable graft function. Conclusions The main clinical manifestations of PRCA caused by HPV-B19 infection after kidney transplantation are anemia symptoms, lacking other clinical symptoms of viral infection. HPV-B19 DNA detection combined with blood routine examination, reticulocyte count and bone marrow cytology (or none) can diagnose HPV-B19 infection. High dose of IVIG is effective and safe, and a repeated course is still effective when the infection recurs. For refractory PRCA that IVIG monotherapy fail, a combination with conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine can effectively improve the anemia without graft dysfunction.
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of lamividine (LAM) combined with adefovir (ADV) versus entecavir (ETV) for lamivudine-resistant (LAM-R) hepatitis B in renal transplant recipients. MethodOutpatients and inpatients of lamivudine-resistant kidney graft recipients with chronic hepatitis B admitted to West China Hospital and the People's Hospital of Santai County during Jan 2007 to Mar 2012 were divided into A group (LAM+ADV) and B group (ETV). And the level of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), level of serum creatinine, HBV serological markers and HBV-DNA load were compared by SPSS 16.0 software. ResultsA total of 15 patients were included. The mean age was 36.7±6.6 years old, the majority of patients were male. After treatment for 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks, 96 weeks, no significant differences were found between two groups in liver function normalization rates, the HBV-DNA negative conversion rates and serum creatinine level. ConclusionsLAM add-on ADV combination therapy and ETV monotherapy were both safe and effective in LAM-R kidney transplants with CHB, but the load of HBV-DNA in some patients were still positive at the endpoint. Elevated serum creatinine level may occur in some patients who treated with ADV. Consequently, for HBsAg-positive kidney transplantation patients, those anti-HBV drugs that are more effective, safer and less resistant may be better in the beginning of treatment.
To establ ish a simple and stable cervical ectopic renal transplantation rat model that increase surgical successful rate. Methods A total of 208 male inbred Wistar rats (weighing 220-260 g) were randomly served as donors and recipients. The graft consisting of kidney, renal vein (RV) and renal artery (RA) was obtained, and perfused in situ. The donor RA was end-to-end anastomosed to the recipient left common carotid artery (CCA) by using of “sleeve” anastomosis,and the donor RV to the recipient right external jugular vein by using of “cuff” technique. The distal end of the ureter wasbrought out to form cervical cutaneous stomas. Results A total of 104 ectopic renal transplantations were performed in rats, including stages of the pre-experiment (62 operations) and experiment (42 operations). The success rates of the two stages were 80.6% and 95.2%, respectively. The causes of failure in the pre-experimental stage were anesthesia accidents, thrombosis of the arterial anastomosis, massive hemorrhage, air embol ism and phlebemphraxis. In the experimental stage, 2 rats died due to late anastomotic hemorrhage and thrombosis. The remaining 40 transplanted kidney survived more than 6 months. The time for surgery was (40 ± 6) minutes, the average time for donor surgery was (20 ± 5) minutes, the preparation time for the graft was (8 ± 2) minutes, the operative time for the recipient was (18 ± 3) minutes, including the time for the arterial anastomosis (5 ± 2) minutes and venous anastomosis (2 ± 1) minutes, the cold ischemia time of graft was (15 ± 3) minutes. Conclusion The cervical ectopic renal transplantation technique has the advantages of easy-and fast-to-perform, shorter operation and cold ischemia time, higher successful rate.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) after renal transplantation. Method Searching: Medline, Embase, Cochrane library and Chinese Biomedicine database (CBM); identified the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and applied Revman 4.11 for statistical analyses. Results Twenty-two RCTs were identified, involving MMF and AZA for anti-rejection after renal transplantation. The data shown that MMF (2 g/d) was more beneficial than AZA in improving the graft survival rate of short periods and the long-term patient survival rate, but there was no statistical differences between MMF (3 g/d) with AZA. Whether in 6 months or in 1 year after renal transplantation, the use of MMF (2 g/d) or MMF (3 g/d) could markedly reduce the incidence of biopsy-proven rejection. Conclusions Comparing with AZA, MMF is a more potent immunosuppressive drug, and more efficient in reducing the acute rejection after renal transplantation. MMF can improve the graft and patient survival rate. The 2 gram per day is more acceptable.
Objective To review the vascular anatomy of the donor and the reci pient for the l iving kidney transplantation. Methods The recent l iterature about the vessels of donor and reci pient in cl inical appl ications was extensively reviewed. Results The pertinent vascular anatomy of the donor and recipient was essential for the screening of the proper candidates, surgical planning and long-term outcome. Early branching and accessory renal artery of the donor were particularly important to deciding the side of nephrectomy, surgical technique and anastomosing pattern, and their injuries were the most frequent factor of the conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery. With increase of laparoscopic nephrectomy indonors, accurate venous anatomy was paid more and more attention to because venous bleeding could also lead to conversion to open nephrectomy. Multidetector CT (MDCT) could supplant the conventional excretory urography and renal catheter angiography and could accurately depict the donors’ vessels, vascular variations. In addition, MDCT can excellently evaluate the status of donor kidney, collecting system and other pertinent anatomy details. Conclusion Accurate master of related vascular anatomy can facil iate operation plan and success of operation and can contribute to the rapid development of living donor kidney transplantation. MDCT has become the choice of preoperative one-stop image assessment for living renal donors.
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of steroid withdrawal in modern triple immunosuppressant (Cycloproine/Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil and Steroid) on renal transplantation recipients. Methods We searched MEDLINE (1966-Sep. 2005), OVID (1966-2004), EMBASE (1984-2004), The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2005), CBMdisc (1994-2005), and handsearched 7 Chinese Journals. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) adopting modern triple immunosuppressant, and comparing steroid withdrawal (SW), group and steroid continuing group (SC) were selected. The quality of included studies was evaluated and graded according to Cochrane Reviewer’s Handbook 4.2.5, and meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 4.2.7 software. Results Nine RCTs including 1 681 patients (845 in SW and 836 in SC) were identified. The average follow-up time was 6-12 months. No significant difference was found in using CsA or Tac in modern triple immunosuppressant. The results of our meta-analysis showed: ① the risk of acute rejection was two times higher in SW than SC (RR 2.05, 95% CI 1.54 to 2.72, P lt;0.000 01), mainly Banff grade I (mild) (RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.16 to 3.17, P =0.01); but no significant differences were found on Banff grade II and III between the two groups. ② the rate of graft and patient survival and chronic rejection were the same between two groups. ③ Steroid withdrawal decreased the incidence of opportunistic infection (mainly caused by simplex herpes virus and Candida) and urinary tract infection. While the incidence of CMV and sepsis infection has no significant difference between two groups. Conclusion Steroid withdrawal within 3 months in modern immunosuppressive regimen ① increases the risk of Banff Grade I rejection reaction, but the moderate and severe rejection are similar between the two groups; ② doesn’t affect the rate of graft, patient survival, and chronic rejection; ③ decreases the incidence of opportunistic and urinary tract infection, but doesn’t improve the CMV infection and sepsis. To prophylaxis serious infection, steroid withdrawal is worth considering under sufficient immunosuppressive regimen. The key point is to balance the benefit and harm for individual recipients.
ObjectiveTo investigate the decision of combined liver and kidney transplantation (CLKT) after renal transplantation, provide surgical therapeutic experience for those patients with liver and renal insufficiencies and hepatorenal syndrome and summarize the risk factors, demerits and merits, and operative indications of CLKT. MethodsThe data of three successful CLKT cases of our centre from Feb. 2014 to Jan 2015 were retrospectively analyzed, and these three patients had kidney transplantation before. We also reviewed the latest associated literatures. ResultsThree patients got successful operations of CLKT and had very good recovery of renal function several days ofter operaton. Two of them discharged a few weeks after surgery, and one of these two patients got severe pulmonary infection of fungus two month after CLKT but recovered under proper therapy finally. The third patient died of severe mixed infection one month after CLKT. ConclusionsThe surgical techniques and rejection are not the main impact factor to the prognosis of CLKT after renal transplantation. Infection is the biggest trouble to which we should pay most of our attention. We should decide whether to do synchronous or nonsynchronous CLKT according to the situation before surgery. Moreover, the systematic therapy administration after CLKT is very necessary for the patients' long-term survival.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (TAC) and cyclosporine A (CsA) for patients after renal transplantation.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CBM, WanFang Data and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of TAC vs. CsA after renal transplantation from inception to December, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 12 RCTs involving 3 130 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with CsA, the TAC had lower incidence of acute rejection at 6 months after renal transplantation (RR=0.61, 95%CI 0.50 to 0.74, P<0.000 01), and had higher glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (MD=4.20, 95%CI 1.07 to 7.34, P=0.009), lower incidence of dyslipidemia (RR=0.46, 95%CI 0.27 to 0.80, P<0.006), higher incidence of diabetes (RR=1.36, 95%CI 1.12 to 1.65, P=0.002) at 12 months after renal transplantation. There was no significant difference between two groups in the incidence of hypertension after renal transplantation (RR=0.90, 95%CI 0.69 to 1.17,P=0.43).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that, compared with CsA, TAC can significantly improve renal function, reduce the risk of acute rejection and dyslipidemia, but it can increase the risk of diabetes. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify above conclusions.