Objective To analyze the causes and the reoperation therapies after salvage limb surgery with prosthesis for bone tumors. Methods The retrospective analysis was performed on 85 patients undergoing the limb salvage operation with prosthetic replacement for tumors from January 1994 to December 2004. Ofthe patients, 21 (13 males and 8 females, aged 18-58 years) underwent reoperations for various reasons. All the diagnoses were pathologically confirmed(10 patients with osteosarcoma, 4 with chondrosarcoma, 5 with giant cell tumor of the bone, 2 with osteofibrosarcoma). The distal femur was involved in 9 patients, proximal tibia in 8, proximal femur in 2, proximal humerus in 1, and acetabulum in 1. According to the Enneking surgical grading system, there were 5 patients in ⅠB and 16 in ⅡB. The time between the first operation and the reoperation was 2 weeks to 20 years. The common reasons for the reoperation were tumor recurrence in 8 patients, prosthetic loosening in 5, no healing of the incision in4,joint dislocation in 3, and implant fracture in 1. The amputation and the prosthesis revision were respectively performed on 6 patients, extensive resection ofthe tumor on 3, the myo-skin flap translocation on 4, internal hemipelvectomy without reconstruction on 1, and open reduction on 1.Results The follow-up in18 patients for 1-5 years (average, 3 years and 4 months) revealed that 4 patients died of osteosarcoma with pulmonary metastasis. The other 14 patients had no tumor recurrence or loosening of the prosthesis, and the incisions healed well. The assessment on the joint function was performed on 13 of the 18 patients and the results were as follows: excellent in 2 patients, good in 5, fair in 4, and poor in 2, with a satisfaction rate of the reoperation with limb salvage of 84.6%and an excellent-good rate of 53.8%. Conclusion Tumor recurrence is the most common reason for the reoperation after the limb salvage with prosthesis for tumors, and loosening of the prosthesis is an important reason, too. By therules of the bone tumor limb savage, the limb salvage operations can also beperformed, which can achieve a satisfactory result of the limb function.
Objective To analyze the causes of mechanical valve dysfunction and the reconstructive surgical procedure, and summarize the treatment experiences in perioperative period. Methods From October 1996 to October 2008, 12 276 patients underwent mechanical valve replacement in Fu Wai Hospital. Thirtytwo of them were reoperated because of mechanical valve dysfunction. There were 12 male and 20 female aged from 1661 years with an average age of 43.8 years. All the reoperations were performed under hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass, including 16 mitral valve replacement, 8 aortic valve replacement, 3 aortic and mitral valve replacement, 3 tricuspid valve replacement, 2 disc rotation and 1 excision of an excessive knot. There were 13 emergency operation and 19 elective operation. Results The time of ventilator assistant respiration was 5.1-144.0 hours.The median time was 15 hours and tracheostomy was needed in 2 cases. Six patients died after reoperations, the mortality rate was 18.8%(6/32). Three died of low cardiac output syndrome, 2 died of multiple organ failure and 1 died of malignant arrhythmia. Three cases had complications. There were 1 infective endocarditis, 1 intractable hiccup and 1 incisional infection, respectively. They were all cured and discharged. Conclusion Prosthetic valve dysfunction is one of the serious complications after mechanical valve replacement. Early detection, early diagnosis and early reoperation are needed.
ObjectiveTo analyze the reasons for the failure of scleral buckling (SB) in the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, and observe the efficacy and safety of re-buckling.MethodsThis was a retrospective non-comparative clinical research. From July 2014 to June 2020, patients with first-time SB failure who visited the Beijing Tongren Hospital were included in this study. There were 42 patients, including 30 males and 12 females, with the average age of 29.40±16.13 years, and they were all monocular. The retinal detachment range＜1, 1-2 and＞2 quadrants were 9, 22 and 11 eyes, respectively. The macula was involved in 38 eyes. The average logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.99±0.57. Forty eyes and 2 eyes were performed 1 and 2 SB, and all the retina were not reattached. All patients were under general anesthesia, according to the conditions during the operation, re-freeze and located the holes under indirect ophthalmoscope. And selected the new external pressure material or retained the old one in combination with the other operations to reattaced the retina. The average follow-up time was 31.93±18.97 months. The reasons for the failure of the first surgery based on the records of this surgery were analyzed. The visual acuity changes, the rate of retinal reattachment and the occurrence of complications were observed. The visual changes were compared by paired t test.ResultsThe top three reasons for the failure were: 16 case of the displacement of the compression spine (38.10%); 9 cases of missing the retinal holes and 9 case of improper selection of compression substances (account for 21.43%, respectively); 6 cases of insufficient height of compression spine (14.29%). All of retina were reattached (100%, 42/42). The average logMAR BCVA was 0.52±0.40. The difference of logMAR BCVA between before and after surgery was statistically significant (t=6.106, P=0.000). There were a slight increase in intraocular pressure in 8 eyes, the average intraocular pressure was 25.00±2.61 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa). No serious complications occurred after surgery.ConclusionsThe position deviation of the compression spine, the missed hole during the operation, the improper selection of external compression material, and the insufficient height of the compression spine are the main reasons for the failure of SB. After adjusting the reasons for the failure, there is still a higher rate of retinal reattachment.
Objective To summary the clinical experience of liver retransplantation （RLT）， and to improve the effect. Methods The clinical data of 62 cases who had received RLT in our institute from Jan. 2003 to Jun. 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. The survival rates of patients with different interval between two liver transplantation （LT） were calculated， and the data of patients who died and survived during perioperative period after operation were compared and analyzed. Results The 1-， 2-， and 5-year cumulative survival rates of 62 patients were 67.7%， 59.7%， and 56.4%， of early stage RLT patients were 38.5%， 38.5%， and 30.8%， of later stage RLT patients were 75.5%， 65.3%， and 63.3%， respectively. There were 28 patients died after operation， and 20 patients （71.4%） died during perioperative period， whose major cause of death were infection （65.0%， 13/20）， in addition， 4 cases （20.0%） died of multiple organ failure， 2 cased （10.0%） died of hepatic artery complication， 1 case （5.0%） died of portal vein complication. Eight cases （28.6%） died after perioperative period in reason of tumor recurrence. The model for end-stage liver disease （MELD） score 〔（26.95±9.28） score vs. （14.23±9.06） score〕， creatinine （Cr） level 〔（157.3±88.0） μmol/L vs.（69.8±35.9） μmol/L〕， international normalized ratio （INR） value 〔（1.676±0.744） vs.（1.124±0.286）〕， and total bilirubin （TBiL） value 〔431.8 μmol/L vs. 248.2 μmol/L〕 of patients died during perioperative period were higher than that of patients survived after perioperative period （P＜0.05）. The ratio of abnormal Cr of patients died during perioperativeperiod and survived after perioperative period were 60.0% （12/20） and 7.1% （3/42）， respectively. The 34 patients who had survived after perioperative period were all got followed-up for 3-104 months （average 49 months）. There were no tumor recurrence during the followed-up， and liver function of them were normal. Conclusions RLT is an effective method for irreversible graft failure after LT. Optimum operative time and reasonable individual immunosuppressive regimen to decrease the infection rate are all contribute to the increase of the survival rate.
To assess long-term outcomes of reoperation for recurrent lumbar disc herniation, and to compare results of different methods. Methods There were 95 patients who had reoperation for recurrent lumbar discherniation between February 1998 to February 2003, among whom a total of 89 (93.7%) were followed up and their primary data were reviewed. There were 76 patients, with the mean age of 42 years (range from 23 to 61), who met the inclusion criteria and were included. Among them, there were 55 males and 21 females. All patients had the history of more than one sciatic nervepain. The mean recurrent time was 69 months(range from 8 to 130 months). There were 48 patients in L4,5 and 28 patients in L5, S1, of whom we chose 30 to undergo larger vertebral plate discectomy (or two-side fenestration) and nucleus pulpose discectomy (group A), 24 to undergo the whole vertebral discectomy (group B) and 22 to undergo the whole vertebral discectomy and 360degrees intervertebral fusion(group C). The patients’ cl inical results in the three groups were compared, and the cl inical curative effects were evaluated by using cl inical functional assessment standard. Results Cl inical outcomes were excellent or good in 80.3% of the patients, including 80.0% of group A, 79.2% of group B and 81.8% of group C. There was no significant difference in each group (P gt; 0.05). These three groups were not different in age, pain-free interval and follow-up duration (P gt; 0.05). The mean intraoperative blood losses in the three groups were (110.7 ± 98.8), (278.7 ± 256.3), (350.7 ± 206.1) mL, respectively. The mean surgery time were (65.9 ± 22.8), (111.6 ± 24.3), (127.3 ± 26.7) minutes, respectively, and the mean hospital ization time were (6.7 ± 1.4), (10.2 ± 1.8), (12.2 ± 2.3) days, respectively. Group A was significantly less than group B or C (P lt; 0.05) and there was no significant difference between group B and C. All the patients were followed up for 36 to 96 months with an average of 86 months, and with (87.6 ± 27.0), (84.5 ± 19.8), (83.6 ± 13.5) months of group A, B and C, respectively. At the endof the follow-up, there were more cases of spinal instabil ity at the same level in group B (19 patients) than in group A (1 patient) or group C (no patient) in X-ray, and the difference was significant (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Reoperation for recurrent lumbar disc herniation is effective. Larger vertebral plate discectomy or tow-side fenestration is recommended for managing recurrent lumbar disc herniation.
Abstract:Objective To investigate the reoperation indication,surgical timing and the key point of surgical treatment of prosthetic valve endocarditis （PVE） after valve replacement. Methods From February 2000 to July 2005,18 patients with PVE underwent surgery ,their clinical manifestation ,process of treatment and their prognosis outcome were analyzed. Results There were 3 patients （16.7 %） of early-death, 1 patient died of septic shock, and 2 patients died of multiple organ failure. Since 2003,there was no operative death for all 11 patients. There were 6 patients with respiratory insufficiency, 2 patients with renal insufficiency,which were recovered after treatment. The 15 survivors were followed up from 1 month to 5years. There was recurrence of infection in 1 patient who died after ineffective medical treatment. The other 14 patients recovered well. Conclusion It has high risk and high mortality for reoperation for PVE. Accurate reoperative indication,optimal surgical timing,radical debridment of infected tissue and correct perioperative use of antibiotics are the key factors to improve the reoperative result for PVE.
ObjectiveTo develop a machine learning model to identify preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative high-risk factors of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LHR) and to predict recurrent hernia. Methods The patients after LHR from 2010 to 2018 were included. Twenty-nine characteristic variables were collected, including patient demographic characteristics, chronic medical history, laboratory test characteristics, surgical information, and postoperative status of the patients. Four machine learning algorithms, including extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and k-nearest neighbor algorithm (KNN), were used to construct the model. We also applied Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) for visual interpretation of the model and evaluated the model using the k-fold cross-validation method, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). ResultsA total of 1 178 patients with inguinal hernias were included in the study, including 114 patients with recurrent hernias. The XGBoost algorithm showed the best performance among the four prediction models. The ROC curve results showed that the area under the curve (AUC) value of XGBoost was 0.985 in the training set and 0.917 in the validation set, which showed high prediction accuracy. The K-fold cross-validation method, calibration curve, and DCA curve showed that the XGBoost model was stable and clinically useful. The AUC value in the independent validation set was 0.86, indicating that the XGBoost prediction model has good extrapolation. The results of SHAP analysis showed that mesh size, mesh fixtion, diabetes, hypoproteinemia, obesity, smoking history, low intraoperative percutaneous arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), and low intraoperative body temperature were strongly associated with recurrent hernia. ConclusionThe predictive model of recurrent hernia after LHR in patients derived from the XGBoost machine learning algorithm in this study can assist clinicians in clinical decision making.
ObjectiveTo explore the value of laparoscopic choledocholithotomy on hepatolithiasis patients with previous bile duct surgery contraindicating hepatectomy. MethodsEighty-six hepatolithiasis patients contraindicating hepatectomy accepted laparoscopic choledocholithotomy during March 2009 and March 2013 in the department of general surgery, AVIC 363 hospital. Among them, 26 cases with previous bile duct surgery(PBS group) and 60 cases without (NPBS group), 15 cases with left intrahepatic bile duct stone, 52 cases with right intrahepatic bile duct stone, and 19 cases with bilateral intrahepatic bile duct stone. Perioperative materials were reviewed between two groups retrospectively. ResultsThe operation time of the PBS group and NPBS group was(161.4±31.5) min and(155.7±28.1) min respectively(P > 0.05). And the intraoperative blood loss of them was(69.2±50.7) mL and(44.1±27.4) mL respectively (P < 0.05). Postoperative complication incidence of PBS group was 53.8%, among them, ascites was found obviously much more in PBS group than that in NPBS group(P < 0.05). The general residual stone incidence of two groups was 15.1%, and the general stone clearance rate was 98.8%. The long term postoperative complication occurrence in PBS group was 23.1%, which was higher significantly than that in NPBS group(P<0.05). ConclusionLaparoscopic choledocholithotomy is a safe, effective thus feasible choice for hepatolithiasis patients with previous bile duct surgery, especially for those without hepatic atrophy, bilateral hepatic bile ducts stone with hepatic bile duct stricture and hepatic bile duct stone with coexisting biliary cirrhosis.
Objective To summary the operative technique of liver retransplantation （RLT）. Methods The clinical data of 62 cases who had received RLT in our institute from Jan. 2003 to Jun. 2012 were analyzed retrospectively， and the experience about RLT was summaried too. Results The operative time 〔（12.7±3.5） h vs. （10.5±3.0） h〕， bleeding volume （3 431 mL vs. 2 211 mL）， and blood volume transfused during operation （3 229 mL vs. 1 910 mL） in 62 cases who had underwent RLT were longer or higher than that of 38 patients who had underwent the first liver transplantation （LT） in our hospital （P＜0.05）， but there was no significant difference on the model for end-stage liver disease （MELD） score between the 2 groups （P＞0.05）. All cases were followed up for 1-104 months （average 31 months）. Twenty case died within 1 month after RLT， including sever lung or abdominal infection in 13 cases， multiple organ failure in 4 cases， hepatic artery complication in 2 cases， and portal vein complication in 1 case. Eight cases died of tumor recu-rrence during 14-69 months （average 27 months） after RLT. The cumulative survival rate of 1-， 2-， and 5-year of 62 cases of RLT were 67.7%， 59.7%， and 56.4%， respectively. The 34 patients had survived for 3-104 months （average 49 months）， of them， there were biliary stenosis in 3 cases who were cured by interventional radiology treatment， biliary stenosis in 2 cases who were cured by a third RLT， infection in 10 cases who were cured by anti-infective therapy and immunosuppressant adjustment， light rejection in 2 cases who were relieved by dosage increase of oral immunosuppressant， other 17 cases suffered no complications and all in good condition. Conclusions RLT is an effective method for irreversible graft failure after LT. Proper surgical procedure contributes to the increase of survival rate of patients who has received RLT.
This paper reports twelve patients underwent repeat hepatic resection because of the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinomas after primary resection. The indication of reoperation, selection of incision, difficults encountered in the operation and the treatment after operation are discussed. The authors believe that the second operation is technically more difficult than the first one, some troubles my be happened during the operation and put forward some ways to deal with this situations.