Objective To investigate the feasibility and operation effect of endoscopic sentinel lymph node biopsy （SLNB） in breast cancer. Methods The data of 410 breast cancer patients who underwent SLNB （including 107 patients with endoscopy and 303 with open operation） were analyzed in our hospital from January 2009 to March 2012. SLNB was performed by using methylene blue staining or the combination of methylene blue and 99Tcm-sulfur colloid tracing. Results The successful rate of SLN detection with methylene blue and 99Tcm-sulfur colloid tracing was 94.56% （139/147） in open operation group and 94.25% （82/87） in endoscopy group. The successful rate of SLN detection with methylene blue was 88.46% （138/156）in open operation group and 85.00% （17/20） in endoscopy group. The mean of detected SLN number with combined method or methylene blue was 1.90/1.98 in open operation group and 1.91/1.82 in endoscopy group respectively. SLN-positive rate was 22.30% （31/139） and 25.36% （35/138） in open operation group， and 19.51% （16/82） and 23.53% （4/17） in endoscopy group， respectively. The rate of subcutaneous effusion in endoscopy group was higher than that in open operation group （P=0.001）, but other postoperative complications presented no significant difference. Conclusions Endoscopic SLNB can obtain the similar safety and the clinical efficacy with traditional SLNB， but superior cosmetic effect. So it is worthy of clinical application in breast cancer.
Objective To identify the feasibility of the lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with breast cancer and to examine whether the characteristics of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) accurately predict the status of axillary lymph node.MethodsFrom March to October 2000, 32 patients with breast cancer were evaluated at the Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital. Lymphatic mapping was performed using Methlene Blue. A SLN was defined as any blue node. Thirtytwo patients, with breast cancer underwent a complete axillary lymph node resection (ALNR) following SLN biopsy. Subsequently, all SLNs and ALNs were examined by both Hamp;E staining as well as immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin. ResultsLymphatic mapping was successful in identifying the SLN in 26/32(81.25%) cases of nodes at level Ⅰ. Of the 26 patients mapped successfully, 10 had metastasis to the SLNs.In 3 cases that SLNs were positive, but other axillary lymph nodes were negative. In 2 cases that the SLNs were negative, but other axillary lymph nodes were positive. The sensitivity of SLNB using Methlene Blue in this study was 77.78%(7/9), accuracy 80.77%(21/26), specificity 82.35%(14/17), and false negative rate 22.22%(2/9). ConclusionSLN can predict the status of the axillary lymph nodes reliably. However, the efficacy of SLNB in the setting of randomized, prospective trials must be tested first before abandoning axillary lymph node resection as the standard of care.
ObjectiveTo review the recent studies about sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer.MethodsThe literatures in recent years on the history, concept, technique and clinical application of sentinel lymph node biopsy were reviewed and summarized.ResultsThere was no unified method for sentinel lymph node biopsy. There was a wide range of detection rate and falsenegative rate.ConclusionProspective multicenter random clinical trials will help to evaluate the clinical application of sentinel lymph node biopsy.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in the surgery of thyroid carcinoma in recent years. MethodsLiteratures about the recent studies on categories of SLNB and the neck lymph node dissection conducted by SLNB in the surgery of thyroid carcinoma were reviewed following the results searched from PubMed and CNKI data base. ResultsSLNB has a high detection rate and it is of great significance to detect the occult metastatic lymph nodes and guide the neck lymph node dissection during operation. ConclusionThe SLNB, with its high accuracy rate on the detection of occult metastatic lymph nodes, guides neck lymph node dissection during operation in order that it can maximize the benefits of patients.
Objective To summarize and analyze the different views on the lymph node metastasis and the extent of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer.Methods The current domestic and foreign reports on lymph node metastasis and lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer were reviewed.Results Lymph node dissection of gastric cancer is based on clinical stage and the location of the tumor. Laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy in treatment of gastric cancer is a safe， feasible， effective， and minimally invasive technique with good outcomes for patients. Sentinel lymph node（SLN） in the clinical assessment of early gastric cancer is feasible，besides with high accuracy and sensitivity. Lymphatic mapping is an effective， easy， and safe method to guide lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer. Evidence-based lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer provide a new perspective to the extent. Conclusions It is difficult to evaluate those methods exactly. Researchers over the world should learn from each other and explore further in order to develop guiding principles in the end.
ObjectiveTo discuss the strategy of locoregional surgery for breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MethodThe pertinent literatures about locoregional surgery concerning breast-conserving therapy, factors of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, pathological shrinkage modes of breast primary tumor, and sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were reviewed. Results①The major benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was to increase the proportion of breast-conserving therapy after downstaging the primary breast tumor. However, the use of breast-conserving therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy might remain a higher risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. It was now widely recognized that the risk factors for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence were multifocal pattern of residual tumor and pathologic residual tumor larger than 2 cm. The shrinkage mode of the primary breast tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its relative factors were still unclear. 2 Sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB) was feasible either before or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and approval by SLNB guideline and expert consensus. Patients with a cN0 status could get more benefits from SLNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Although there was a bright future for SLNB as an alternative to ALND for patients with primary cN1 and downstaging to cN0 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, it needed to obtain the accepted clinical identification rate, false negative rate, as well as similar regional recurrence rate and overall survival as compared to ALND. ConclusionsCurrently, surgical management is crucial for reducing the locoregional recurrence risk of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, no matter what the clinical and radiographic efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is. In the era of genomics and SLNB, individual locoregional surgical management could be arrived according to the primary stage and neoadjuvant chemotherapy response.
ObjectiveTo summarize the current status and advances of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) technique in breast cancer. MethodsThe pertinent domestic and overseas literatures were reviewed and the localization, harvest, status assessment, indications, and complications of SLNB were analyzed. ResultsSLNB could accurately locate and pick out sentinel lymph node (SLN) in breast cancer. The development on imaging examination and pathological techniques promoted the assessment of SLN, and the indications of SLNB were expanding. The complication rate of SLNB was low and the technique could accurately predict axillary lymph node staging and direct selective axillary lymph node dissection. ConclusionsSLNB has been an important method of surgical therapy in breast cancer, but the operation process needs to be further standardized to decrease the false negative rate. Continuative attentions shall be paid to the problems such as the false positive and controversial indications.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of sentinel lymph node biopsy following total mastectomy on immunologic function and prognosis for patients with early breast cancer. MethodsTwo hundred and eleven patients with early breast cancer were entered in this study. In all these cases, the results of sentinel lymph node biopsy were negative. These patients were randomly divided into control group and research group. In 86 cases of control group, the sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary lymph node dissection following total mastectomy was performed. In 125 cases of research group, the sentinel lymph node biopsy following total mastectomy was performed. The injury of shoulder joint function was analyzed in one year after surgery. The changes of T cell subsets and IL-2 level were detected in the patients respectively on the first day before operation, the second week after operation, and the fourth week after operation. Postoperative fatality rate and postoperative recurrence rate were also observed in two groups. Results①The points of shoulder joint function in the control group and the research group were 72.7±6.5 and 93.5±8.2 respectively, there was an obvious difference (P < 0.05).②The injury degree of shoulder joint function in the research group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.01).③Compared with the control group, the changes of T cell subsets and the IL-2 level had no significant differences in the research group on day 1 before operation and on week 2 after operation (P > 0.05). On the fourth week after surgery, the CD4+, CD4+/CD8+, and IL-2 level in the research group were obviously higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). However, the percentage of CD8+ T cell in the research group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05).④There were no significant differences for postoperative fatality rate and postoperative recurrence rate between two groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionsSentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early breast cancer is safe and reliable. With respect to conventional axillary lymph node dissection, it could improve immune function and quality of life after surgery in patients with early breast cancer.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the quality of life after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with breast cancer. MethodsFrom January 2004 to December 2006, 591 patients with breast cancer who were suitable for SLNB were divided into SLNB group (n=339) and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) group (n=252). All patients didn’t have the upper extremity joints disease, the vascular nerve disease, and the cervical spondylosis previously. Results①In patients with SLNB, the circumferences of upper arm in one, two, and three weeks after operation were similar to those before operation (P=0.232, P=0.318, and P=0.415, respectively). While, in patients with ALND, the circumferences of upper arm in one or two weeks after operation were significantly bigger than those before operation (P=0.011, P=0.041, respectively), and the circumference in three weeks after operation was similar to that before operation (P=0.290). ②In patients with SLNB, the outreach angles of shoulder joint in one and two weeks after operation were significantly smaller than those before operation (P=0.031, P=0.043, respectively), and the angle in three weeks after operation was similar to that before operation (P=0.196). However, in patients with ALND, the angles in one, two or three weeks after operation were significantly smaller than those before operation (all Plt;0.001). ③The retention time of drainage tube in patients with ALND who received breast conserving surgery or mastectomy was significantly longer than that in patients with SLNB who received mastectomy (all Plt;0.001). ④The infection rate and the sensory disjunction rate in patients with ALND were significantly higher than those in patients with SLNB (P=0.002, Plt;0.001, respectively). ConclusionsFor patients with lymph node negative breast cancer, SLNB could decrease postoperative complications, and improve the quality of life. It could also save money by reducing hospital stay.
ObjectiveTo explore influence of molecular classification of breast cancer on surgical treatment of axillary lymph nodes. MethodThe related literatures which discussed the relation between molecular classification and axillary lymph node metastasis were reviewed and analyzed. ResultsThe triple negative breast cancer had a lower rate of sentinel lymph node or non-sentinel lymph node metastasis. The axillary lymph node metastasis rate was higher in the luminal B or HER-2 overexpression subtypes. Especially, luminal B subtype had a higher risk of sentinel lymph node or non-sentinel lymph node metastasis as compared with the other subtypes. Elderly patients with breast conserving operation could be free for axillary lymph node dissection when only 1-2 sentinel lymph node metastases. There was still a positive possibility of non-sentinel lymph node for younger patients with a larger tumor size, even if the sentinel lymph node negative, the lymph node dissection may benefit these patients. ConclusionBreast cancer molecular classification should be considered for the surgery selection of axillary lymph node dissection.