Objective To explore the technique of the soft tissue balancing inthe total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the patients with the knees of varus deformity and flexion contracture. Methods From January 2001 to December 2005, 86 patients (19 males, 67 females; age, 57-78 years;average, 66 years) with the knees of varus deformity and flexion contracture underwent primary TKA and the balancing of the soft tissues. All the patients had suffered from osteoarthritis. The unibilateral affection was found in 68 patients and the bilateral affection in 18. The varus deformity angle was averaged 12.3° (range, 6-34°). The soft tissue varus accounted for 56.7% and the bony varus accounted for 43.3%. The flexion contracture lt; 10° was found in 21 knees, 10-19° in 45 knees, 20-29° in 22 knees, and gt;30° in 16 knees, with an average angle of 18.9°. Results The flexion contractures were improved. Before operation the average angle ofthe flexion contracture was 18.9° but after operation only 4 patients had a residual flexion contracture of 5° and the remaining patients had a complete correction. The follow-up for 37 months (range, 6-72 months) in all the patients revealed that only 6 patients had a residual flexion contracture of 5-10° and the others had a full extension. Before operation the average varus angle was 12.3°(range, 6-34°) and the average tibiofemoral angle was 174.7° (range, 70.3-175.6°), but after operation the residual varus angle gt; 3° was only found in 2 patients. The complications occurring during operation and after operation were found in 6 patients, injuries to the attachment of the medial collateral ligaments in 2, patellar clunk syndromes in 2, cerebral embolism in 1, and lacunar infarction in 1, with no nerve disorders left after the medical treatment. No skin necrosis, the cut edge infection or deep infection occurred. Conclusion The balancing of the soft tissues is a major management for correction of the varus deformity and the flexion contracture. The proper balancing of the softtissues can achieve an obvious recovery of the function and correction of the varus deformity after TKA.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the value of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with computer navigation by comparing with conventional TKA. MethodsBetween May 2010 and December 2011, 45 patients underwent primary unilateral TKA, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Of 45 patients, 22 cases were treated with TKA with computer navigation (group A), 23 cases with the conventional TKA (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, side, cause of disease, disease duration, preoperative range of motion (ROM) of the knee, and preoperative Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incidence of patellar retinacular release, complication, and drainage volume were compared. The prosthesis loosening, postoperative HSS score, and ROM of the knee were also compared. ResultsNo difference was found in the incidence of patellar retinacular release during TKA, and it was 13.6% (3/22) in group A and was 4.3% (1/23) in group B, showing no significant difference (χ2=1.198, P=0.346). The operation time of group A was significantly longer than that of group B (t=7.557, P=0.000). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss during TKA between 2 groups (t=-0.295, P=0.769), while the drainage volume of group A was significantly less than that of group B (t=-2.419, P=0.020). Incomplete fracture during TKA and acute infection occurred at 8 days after TKA in 1 case of group A respectively, while no fracture or infection was found in group B, showing significant difference (Z=-0.509, P=0.000). The patients of 2 groups were followed up 27-46 months. No significant difference in valgus and varus of knee, and malalignment of the femoral and tibial prosthesis was found (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in HSS score and ROM of the knee at last follow-up between 2 groups (P > 0.05). No prosthesis loosening was found in 2 groups. ConclusionTKA with computer navigation has similar results to conventional TKA in the mechanical alignment, but it obviously prolongs operation time. It may also increase the incidence of infection and tractor pin related fracture.
Objective To investigate a modified robotized hydraulictensor for management of the ligament balance in the total knee arthroplasty. Methods The effect of the modified robotized hydraulic tensor on the mechanical behaviour of the ligament system balance in the total knee arthroplasty was analyzed andthe related information was obtained. Results The robotized hydraulic tensor acted as a tensorsensor system, which could assist the surgeon by providing thequantitative information to align the lower limb in extension, equalize the articular spaces in extension and flexion, balance the internal and external forces, and define the femoral component rotation, and by providing the information toplan the releasing of the soft tissues and the rotating of the femoral component. Conclusion The modified robotized hydraulic tensor can enable the surgeon to properly manage the ligament balance in the total knee arthroplasty.
Objective To make a retrospective analysis on an early clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the knees with different degrees of flexion-contracture deformities. Methods Ninety-seven knees of 65 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty with the Scorpio posterior-stabilized knee prosthesis from January 2000 to December 2003 were reviewed, including 51 osteoarthritis patients (74 knees) and 14 rheumatoid arthritis patients (23 knees). Thirtythree patients underwent unilateral TKA, and 32 patients underwent bilateral TKA. The average range of motion (ROM) before operation was 82.8°(range, 5-140°).According to the preoperative flexion-contracture degrees of the knees, these patients were divided into 2 groups, group A and group B. Group A consisted of the patients with flexioncontracture less than 20° (range, 0-15°), and group B consisted of the patients with flexion-contracture not less than 20° (range, 20-60°). In group A, the average flexion-contracture degree, ROM, KSS (knee society score), and function score were 10.7±8.0°, 104.6±20.0°, 29.1±18.0, and 32.6±20.7, respectively. But the corresponding data were much worse ingroup B than in group A, which were 28.2±7.8°, 60.8±26.6°, 12.1±13.2, and 26.8±18.1. All the operations were primary total knee arthroplasty, and they were performed by the same group of surgeons. The time for the prosthesis installed lasted for 25.6 minutes, and the average tourniquet time was 34.7 minutes. Three or four days after operation, the patients began the continuous passive motion (CPM) and active functional exercise of the knee.Results The patients were followed up for an average of 2 years and 7 months(range, 8 mon-3.5 yr). During the follow-up period, the average flexion-contracture degree, ROM, KSS, and function score in group A were 0.4±2.1°, 108.6±19.0°, 82.1±13.8, and 72.3±29.1, respectively; and the corresponding data in group B were 1.3±3.2°, 986±16.4°, 75.9±8.2, and 81.4±26.9, respectively. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups. No revision or deep infection was found. Conclusion The curative effect is mainly determined by the surgeon’s good operational skills, rich clinical experience, and familiarity with the prosthesis, and it is not influenced by severity of the knee flexioncontracture deformity. The knee ROM after TKA, which has a “toward middle ROM”phenomenon, is influenced by many clinical factors. It is very important for the patientto perform a functional exercise of the knee as early as possible after operation.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of the surgeon’s handedness on the distribution of prosthesis during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 86 patients (100 knees) with primary TKA completed by the same right-handed surgeon between December 2016 and December 2018, including 72 cases of single knee and 14 of bilateral knees. The patients were divided into dominant group (right side) and non-dominant group (left side) according to the operating position of the surgeon and each group had 50 knees. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, disease duration, clinical diagnosis, preoperative Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, and other general data between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time and complications were recorded in both groups. The function of knee was evaluated by HSS score. Hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were measured by using X-ray film of full-length lower extremity before TKA and at 2 weeks after TKA that were used to evaluate the coronal position of the prosthesis. Posterior distal femoral angle (PDFA) and posterior proximal tibial angle (PPTA) were measured by using lateral X-ray films at 3 months after operation that were used to evaluate the sagittal position of the prosthesis.ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (t=−1.128, P=0.262). One case of posterior tibial artery thrombosis occurred in the dominant group, and 1 case of poor healing of the incision occurred in each of the dominant group and the non-dominant group. Patients in both groups were followed up 12-34 months with an average of 22.0 months. The HSS scores at last follow-up were 87.2±4.3 in the dominant group and 86.8±5.0 in the non-dominant group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (t=0.471, P=0.639). No complications such as periprosthetic infection, prosthetic loosening, or periprosthetic fracture occurred during follow-up. There was no significant difference in the HKA, mLDFA, and mMPTA between the two groups before and after operation (P>0.05). The differences in the incidence of sagittal femoral prosthesis malposition and PDFA between the two groups were significant (P<0.05); however, there was no significant difference in the PPTA, the rate of femoral prosthesis distributed in the neutral position, the incidence of over-flexed femoral prosthesis, and the incidence of anterior femoral notch (P>0.05).ConclusionThe surgeon’s handedness is one of the factors affecting the placement of the sagittal femoral prosthesis in primary TKA. The incidence of sagittal femoral prosthesis malposition could increase when the surgeon performs on the non-dominant side.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the midvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty. Methods We searched The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, and CBM to identify clinical controlled trials comparing the midvastus approach with the medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. The quality of the included studies was critically assessed and the data analyses were performed by the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 5.0. Results Eight studies were included, involving 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 2 quasi-RCTs and 2 non-RCTs. Meta-analyses showed that rate of lateral retinacular release (RR=0.75, 95%CI 0.52 to 1.08, P=0.12), range of motion at 6 week postoperation (MD=2.65, 95%CI –1.20 to 6.50, P=0.18), operation time (MD=1.04, 95%CI –3.50 to 5.58), and adverse events postoperation (OR=1.04, 95%CI 0.43 to 2.52, P=0.94) were similar between the midvastus approach and the medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. One study showed that there was no significant difference in blood loss interoperation between the two approaches, and two showed that the midvastus approach had less blood loss interoperation than the medial parapatellar approach. There was no statistical analysis about the blood loss interoperation in one study. For the time of straight leg raise, there was no significant difference in two studies. But in one study, it showed that patients needed longer time for straight leg raise. Conclusion Based on the current evidence, the midvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty is as safe and effective as the medial parapatellar approach, but blood loss interoperation and time of straight leg raise are not decided. Due to the poor quality of the included trials, more high-quality RCTs are needed.
Objective To analyze the relationship between the collateral ligament attachment and the epicondylar axis with rotational alignment of the femoral component in the total knee arthroplasty(TKA).Methods Twenty normal cadaver knee joints were anatomized and 2 holes were drilled on the distal femur from the deep and superficial insertions of the medial collateral ligaments to the lateral condylar part, respectively. Then, all the knees were scanned by MRI on the sagittal plane, making the drilled hole located relatively to the posterior condylar joint surface on the axial plane, and the posterior condylar angle (PCA) and thecondylar twist angle (CTA) were measured.Results The colateral ligament had the deep and superficial parts, and the deep part was strained during the knee flexing. PCA and CTA were 4.50±1.26° and 7.10±0.30° respectively, and there was a significant difference between them(P＜0.05), which were significantly greater than those reported abroad. On the sagittal plane, there wasno significant difference between the radiuses of the posterior medial and lateral condylar circles (Pgt;0.05). The distance from the center of the posterior condylar circle to the deep insertion of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) (d1) was 4.22±0.20 mm, and the distance to the superficial insertionof MCL (d2) was 7.36±0.13 mm. The difference between d1 and d2 was significant(Plt;0.05). Conclusion The center of the posterior condylar circle passes from the deep insertion of the collateral ligament, which can be regarded as a fixed flexionextension axis of the knee. By releasing the different parts of the collateral ligaments, the balance of the flexion and extension gap canbe obtained, and then varus, valgus or flexed contracture deformity of the kneecan be realigned. Besides, the rotational orientation of the femoral prothesis can be made by a reference to the epicondylar insertion of the collateral ligament.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of absorbable barbed suture versus traditional absorbable suture in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, WanFang Data, CNKI and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect clinical trials of absorbable barbed suture versus traditional absorbable suture in TKA from inception to November, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 5 cohort studies were included, involving 2 008 patients. Meta-analysis showed that the joint capsule suture time of the absorbable barbed suture group [MD=–4.31, 95% CI (–4.72, –3.90), P<0.000 01], the incidence of acupuncture injury during suture [OR=0.14, 95% CI (0.03, 0.61),P=0.009], and incision complication rate [OR=0.56, 95% CI (0.36, 0.88), P=0.01] were significantly lower than the traditional absorbable suture group, but the incidence of suture fracture [OR=23.03, 95% CI (3.08, 172.09),P=0.002] was higher, yet the difference was statistically significant. There were no significant differences in the incidence of superficial infection, deep infection, aseptic redness, incision dehiscence and KSS score at 3 months after operation (P>0.05).ConclusionsAvailable evidence suggests that the use of absorbable barbed sutures to close the TKA surgical incision shortens the time to suture the joint capsule, reduces the incidence of acupuncture injury as well as the overall incidence of incision complications without increasing superficial infection, deep infection, and sterility. The incidence of redness and incision splitting has no significant effects on joint function at 3 months after surgery, however the incidence of suture fracture is higher. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, the above conclusions are required to be verified by more high-quality studies.
Objective To analyze the effect of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retaining or not on knee-joint proprioception by comparing the proprioceptive difference between PCL retaining and no PCL retaining in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods Between June 2009 and June 2010, 38 osteoarthritis patients meeting the inclusion criteria were divided into PCL retaining group (group A, n=19) and PCL-substituting group (group B, n=19) according to the random number table. There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, the range of motion of the knee between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The effectiveness and the knee-joint proprioception were separately assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score and the passive angle reproduction test (30, 60, and 90° of knee flexion) preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. Results All incisons healed by first intention, without complications of infection, fracture, and deep vein thrombosis of lower limb. The patients were followed up 12-17 months (mean, 14.1 months). The knee function after operation was obviously improved when compared with preoperative one; significant differences were observed in the WOMAC scores and the results of passive angle reproduction test between at preoperation and at 12 months after operation (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was found between group A and group B (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion Whether PCL retaining or not in TKA both can improve knee-joint proprioception, and no obvious difference between them.
ObjectiveTo evaluate short-term effectiveness of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve and MBT implant.MethodsA clinical data of 23 patients (24 knees) who underwent revision TKA by using porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve combined with MBT implant between March 2015 and April 2017 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 8 males (8 knees) and 15 females (16 knees). The age ranged from 48 to 85 years (mean, 65.4 years). The cause of revision TKA included infection in 14 knees, aseptic loosening in 8 knees, instability in 1 knee, and stiff knee in 1 knee. Bone defects were classified according to the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) bone defect classification. The femoral defect was rated as type ⅡA in 5 knees, type ⅡB in 17 knees, and type Ⅲ in 2 knees; the tibial defect was rated as type ⅡA in 2 knees, type ⅡB in 20 knees, and type Ⅲ in 2 knees. The mean time between primary TKA and revision TKA was 30.6 months (range, 6-86 months). The preoperative range of motion (ROM) was (56.0±24.9)°. The preoperative Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) total score was 41.9±14.2; and the pain and function scores were 8.5±5.2 and 33.4±13.5, respectively.ResultsAll patients were followed up 12-39 months (mean, 25.6 months). The mean operation time was 2.2 hours (range, 1.6-2.9 hours). The mean intraoperative blood loss was 580 mL (range, 400-1 000 mL). There were 2 knees (8.3%) of intraoperative fracture associated with Sleeve insertion and 1 knee (4.2%) of acute postoperative infection at 25 days after revision TKA. All incisions healed by first intention. No deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity occurred. X-ray film showed that all implants were stable. At last follow-up, slight discomfort after exercise occurred in 4 knees (16.7%); end-of-stem pain in the tibia occurred in 1 knee (4.2%). The ROM was (114.6±5.1)°, which had significant improvement compared with the preoperative result (t=11.698, P=0.000). The HSS total score (89.0±10.9), pain score (26.9±6.6), and function score (62.1±5.8) also had significant improvement compared with the preoperative results (t=15.616, P=0.000; t=12.522, P=0.000; t=10.076, P=0.000).ConclusionThe porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve combined with MBT implant in revision TKA has a significant improvement in short-term effectiveness and no signs of implant loosening.