The post-marketing clinical safety re-evaluation studies of traditional Chinese medicine injections have obtained safety evidence of various research types such as active monitoring, passive monitoring and literature review. However, there is a lack of comprehensive evaluation methods that can effectively integrate the data of the above research types. So far, it is impossible to further produce more comprehensive and objective high-level evidence-based evidence, which seriously affects the supervision and management of traditional Chinese medicine injections and clinical rational use. The key to establishment of a comprehensive evaluation method is to first establish a comprehensive evaluation of the core indicators of the preferred method, the formation of weighted quantitative scoring model applied to the comprehensive evaluation method. Mixed methods research (MMR) can effectively and deeply integrate different types of research data and scientifically and normatively complete the screening of indicators in the evaluation model through repeated quantitative and qualitative research on data. Secondly, for the most critical index weighting and weight adjustment research in the model construction research, the author innovatively combines the analytic hierarchy process with the invariant weight sub-constraint method, and introduces the quantitative research part of the MMR design. It ensures the accurate weighting of indicators in the process of model construction. Therefore, based on the research on the core outcome set proposed for the core outcome outcomes of the effectiveness test, this paper proposes the use of MMR to carry out index screening and weight adjustment research based on multi-source complex data, and to construct a comprehensive evaluation model of post-marketing clinical safety of traditional Chinese medicine injections that integrates different research types of data. It provides measurement tools and new methods for the comprehensive evaluation of post-marketing clinical safety of traditional Chinese medicine injections.
The paper discusses the scientificity, evidence-based research, clinical practice and related problems of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) from three aspects: theory, demonstration and application, and attempts to clarify ambiguities and misconceptions, further correctly evaluate the historical status, important value and realistic significance of TCM, strengthen our national and cultural confidence, reinforce our theoretical and practical confidence, and strongly refute the derogation and stigmatization towards TCM theory and practice by very few people, in order to provide suggestions for the progress and development of TCM.
Objective To identify and investigate the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in 11 non-key Chinese medical journals so as to learn about the current status and problems. Methods Eleven non-key medical journals of TCM from 1995 to 2000 were hand searched to identify the RCT and controlled clinical trials (CCTs). Each identified RCT or CCT was page by page verified by handsearchers based on the criteria developed by the Cochrane Handbook; the RCTs’ design, randomization method description, blind, baseline comparison, inclusion and exclusion criteria, diagnostic criteria,criteria for theraputic effectiveness, sample size, statistical method，described outcome, side effects, and follow up etc. were analyzed. Results In the related journals from 1995 to 2000, a total of 66 volumes and 390 issues were checked. As a result, 22 739 clinical studies were identified, of which 1 416 RCTs, only 24 (1.69%) were done with double blinding. There were 141 CCTs from 1995 to 2000, the total number of RCT increased from 95 to 1 416 and most of studies were on digestives diseases. Most of these studies had no detailed randomization method description, only 38 (2.68%) studies provided a methodology description. In addition, 1 220 (86.16% ) described outcome index, 1 203 (84.96%) used statistical method，934 (65.96%) had baseline comparison，828 (58.47%) described diagnostic criteria, 197 (13.91%) had inclusion and exclusion criteria，finally only 89 (6.29%) reported side effects. Conclusions Although the number of RCT has increased in the 11 non-key medical journals of TCM in the past six years, the quality of these RCTs needs to be improved.
We described our understanding of EBM, the ‘three principles＇ and ‘five steps＇ to practice it. EBM is an embodiment of human moral rule and axiom in clinical medicine; it is an advanced clinical model and medical practical methodology; it results from a basis of developed and perfected clinical research methodology, best evidence database, information technology. We also discussed the relationship between EBM and traditional Chinese medicine （TCM） modernization. The definition of modernization of TCM was suggested as scientifical standardization and internationalization. TCM theory in fact is not a basic but a clinical practice theory. EBM model should become the standard model of TCM practice to accelarate the standardization of TCM diagnostic technique and therapy. The key is not try to explain TCM theories with modern medical theroies, but work out common effectiveness evaluation criteria. Only when the effectiveness is intemationally acknowledged, can TCM be internationalized.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the application status of Delphi method in clinical research of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM).MethodsPubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect original research and methodological research on Delphi method in TCM from inception to August 30th, 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and then, descriptive analysis was performed by using qualitative methods.ResultsA total of 612 articles involving 573 original studies and 39 methodological studies were included, which involved 167 types of diseases. The primary research purposes were disease diagnosis and treatment, syndrome research, scale development, evaluation research, index research, clinical investigation, methodology research, and other 8 categories. 487 papers reported the implementation process and results of Delphi method in varying degrees.ConclusionsDelphi method is widely used in clinical research of TCM, however, there are deficiencies in the specific implementation process.
Objective To review the current status of evidence-base medicine (EBM) research on traditional medicine in Japan. Methods Serial reports of EBM special committee of Japan Society for Oriental Medicine (JSOM) were reviewed. Results EBM special committee of JSOM was established earlier and carried out systematic reviews of Kampo treatment throughout Japan. The quality of preparations was standardized and reliable. Evidence Reports of Kampo Treatment 2009 (EKAT 2009) may be a promising promotion for Kampo treatment in Japan. Conclusion For the promotion and development of evidence-based Chinese medicine in China, we need to learn from EBM research projects of JSOM. Based on the current status of EBM research in China, special efforts should be made in validity of research data and scientific analysis and reports of non-randomized trials. According to the characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine, EBM research should be systematically carried out from simple to complex.
The automatic segmentation of auricular acupoint divisions is the basis for realizing intelligent auricular acupoint therapy. However, due to the large number of ear acupuncture areas and the lack of clear boundary, existing solutions face challenges in automatically segmenting auricular acupoints. Therefore, a fast and accurate automatic segmentation approach of auricular acupuncture divisions is needed. A deep learning-based approach for automatic segmentation of auricular acupoint divisions is proposed, which mainly includes three stages: ear contour detection, anatomical part segmentation and keypoints localization, and image post-processing. In the anatomical part segmentation and keypoints localization stages, K-YOLACT was proposed to improve operating efficiency. Experimental results showed that the proposed approach achieved automatic segmentation of 66 acupuncture points in the frontal image of the ear, and the segmentation effect was better than existing solutions. At the same time, the mean average precision (mAP) of the anatomical part segmentation of the K-YOLACT was 83.2%, mAP of keypoints localization was 98.1%, and the running speed was significantly improved. The implementation of this approach provides a reliable solution for the accurate segmentation of auricular point images, and provides strong technical support for the modern development of traditional Chinese medicine.
Objective To assess the reporting quality of noninferiority and equivalence randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). Methods The noninferiority and equivalence RCTs related to TCM were searched, and the quality of the included RCTs was identified in accordance with the extended version of CONSORT statement which refers to the reporting standard of noninferiority and equivalence RCTs. Results A total of 13 noninferiority and equivalence RCTs were included. Except for the common questions of RCTs in reporting quality, some contents related to noninferiority and equivalence trials in reporting were not enough: a) The title of RCTs did not reflect the most important content of the literature; b) The introduction of background was quite simple. The rationale about noninferiority and equivalence trials, and the effectiveness of positive control were not clearly defined; c) All literatures did not indicate whether the subjects, interventions and outcomes in the noninferiority and equivalence trials were identical or similar to those in previous trials of defining the effectiveness of control treatment; d) Most literatures did not define the critical value of noninferiority and equivalence, and did not estimate the sample size; e) Only half of literature described the statistical methods of noninferiority test and equivalence test; and f) Some literature had mistakes in noninferiority and equivalence conclusion. Conclusion The researchers still need deeper understanding of the theoretical basis of noninferiority and equivalence trials. The reference to the extended version of CONSORT statement, which refers to the reporting standard of noninferiority and equivalence RCTs, is helpful for researchers to identify the key points of the design, performance and reporting of the noninferiority and equivalence RCTs, to lay stress on the related contents of noninferiority and equivalence trial reporting, and to radically improve the reporting quality of such clinical trials.
A total of 109 varieties of Chinese medicine injections have been approved by the State Food and Drug Administration of China, all of which have the potential to induce adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Major ADRs include systemic anaphylaxis, anaphylactic shock, acute intravascular hemolysis, hepatorenal damage, skin lesion, cardiac damage, respiratory system injury, and gastrointestinal disorders. Contributing factors of ADRs include healthcare workers’ inadequate attention to ADRs of Chinese medicine injections, complex ingredients, allergic uncertainties, and inappropriate drug use in children and the aged. To decrease ADRs resulting from Chinese medicine injections, it is essential to improve the selection of drug indications, delivery of proper dosage regimens, compliance with drug instructions, and selection of solvents for the drugs.
Objective To evaluate the methodological quality of clinical trials on traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) nursing in recent six years.Methods Such databases as CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data and CBM were searched for collecting clinical trials on TCM nursing published from January 2006 to September 2011, and domestic primary nursing journals were also searched from January 2010 and September 2011. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using quality assessment criteria of the Cochrane systematic review guideline. Results A total of 854 clinical trials were retrieved, including 706 (82.7%) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 108 (12.6%) quasi-randomized controlled trials and 40 (4.7%) non-randomized controlled trials. In the methodological quality analysis, the comparability of baseline was mentioned in 784 trials (91.8%), a total of 498 (58.3%) reported definite diagnosis criteria. 178 (20.8%) reported exclusive criteria. 831 studies (97.3%) applied relevant statistical methods properly. However, only 55 trials (6.4%) mentioned the method of randomization sequence. 10 studies (1.2%) described the method of randomiztion assignment. Blinding was mentioned in 22 studies (2.6%). 98 trials (11.5%) did prospective follow-up. 93 trials (10.9%) had safety description. 20 trials (2.3%) reported lost and with drawl cases, but only 2 conducted intention-to-treat analysis. It was hard to determine whether there was selective reporting bias or not because all the studies did not have protocols. Only 21 studies (2.5%) mentioned the lack of outcome indicators which could be the evidence for existing of bias. By annual analysis, there were 81 trials which conformed to at least 2 low risk criteria. 10 trials (12.3%) was published in 2009, 26 trials (32.1%) published in 2010, and 27 trials published by September 2011, indicated an uptrend. Conclusions According to the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias, the overall quality of clinical trials on TCM nursing is low with defects in different degrees, but it rises gradually over years.