High-quality randomized controlled trials can balance between-group confounding factors and are an important source of comprehensive information on benefits and harms. The CONSORT (consolidated standards of reporting trials) working group released the CONSORT Harms 2022 statement to further improve the harm reporting quality in randomized controlled trials. Traditional Chinese medicine formulas have unique characteristics such as compatibility taboos and using toxic herbs. The harms of traditional Chinese medicine formulas need to be reported in a standard. This study suggests that researchers should pay attention to enhancing the professional competence of research teams, developing suitable standards for reporting the harm of traditional Chinese medicine formulas in randomized controlled trials, and incorporating relevant guidelines into journal publication requirements. These efforts are essential for laying the necessary groundwork for the global dissemination and promotion of traditional Chinese medicine.
Background As part of the core outcome set (COS), the core traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome set can improve the consistency of syndrome efficacy evaluation outcomes in TCM clinical research. Previous studies proposed and empirically verified a method of developing core TCM syndrome sets based on complex syndromes under the disease-syndrome combination research model. However, this method is developed on the basis of syndrome types, which has the limitation that the finally included syndrome types are too single to adapt to the complexity of clinical syndromes. Therefore, it is urgent to optimize the existing development method to balance the complexity of clinical syndromes and methodological feasibility. Methods This study adopted qualitative research methods to obtain opinions from TCM clinicians and researchers on developing methods, efficacy evaluation criteria, and construction forms through expert steering committee meetings and semi-structured interviews. The sample size of semi-structured interviews was determined until data saturation was reached, and thematic analysis was used to analyze the transcription results. Results In the expert steering committee meeting, 60% (3/5) of the experts believed that developing in the form of syndrome elements was more operable; in the semi-structured interviews, 77.78% (7/9) of the experts supported developing in the form of syndrome elements, considering it convenient to use. Meanwhile, the research team added an expert semi-structured interview link in the development process, which complemented the cross-sectional survey used in previous studies to jointly improve the original list of TCM syndrome elements. Conclusion The method of developing core TCM syndrome sets based on syndrome elements formed in this study can consider clinical practice while improving the unity of TCM syndrome efficacy evaluation standards, which is helpful to promote the standardized development of TCM clinical research.