ObjectiveTo compare the cost-effectiveness of warfarin and enoxaparin overlapping treatment for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) or pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS). MethodsA decision tree model was constructed. The efficacy data applied in our decision tree were from clinical data, and the cost data was based on the hospitalization cost of 103 patients with nephrotic syndrome in Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital from 2013 to 2014, State Development and Reform Commission pricing and literature report. The one-way sensitivity analyses was conducted to analyze the stability of test. ResultsIn base case, the cost and cost-effective ratio of warfarin and enoxaparin overlapped treatment for 3 days were 10305.49 yuan and 31607.15, respectively. While those overlapped treatment for 4 days were 8849.36 yuan and 20896.46, overlapped treatment for 5 days and above were 9494.29 yuan and 21659.95, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 4 days versus 5 days and above was 5600.96. The cost-effective ratio of 4 days was lower but the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of it was higher. The sensitivity analysis showed the test result was stable. ConclusionCost-effectiveness analysis shows that warfarin and enoxaparin overlapping treatment for 4 days in patients with nephrotic syndrome has cost-effective advantage. Due to the limited sample size of our study, the above conclusion should be proved by more large-scale high-quality clinical studies.
ObjectivesTo compare different formula calculated dosages with the actual doses of warfarin from patients in Beijing Hospital so as to investigate suitable warfarin dosing models for Chinese patients.MethodsOne hundred and three Chinese patients with long-term prescription of warfarin were randomly selected from Beijing Hospital from July 2012 to May 2013. The CYP2C9 and VKROC1 genotypes and basic statistical information were collected. SPSS 18.0 software was used to compare the differences between different formula calculated dosages and the actual dosages of warfarin.ResultsFive genotypes were found in 103 patients, including: CYP2C9 AA genotype + VKORC1 AA genotype (n=72, 69.9%), CYP2C9 AA genotype + VKORC1 AG genotype (n=17, 16.5%), CYP2C9 AC genotype + VKORC1 AA genotype (n=10, 9.7%), CYP2C9 AC genotype + VKORC1 AG genotype (n=3, 2.9%) and CYP2C9 AA genotype + VKORC1 GG genotype (n=1, 1%). Compared with the actual dosages of warfarin, the degree of coincidence was highest for dosages calculated by Jeffrey’s formula.Conclusions Using Jeffrey’s formula to calculate warfarin dosages may be more suitable for Chinese patients with using long-term warfarin. Due to limited sample size, prospective and large sample size studies are required to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo clarify the relationship between the G/C polymorphism of inflammatory gene matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2) and warfarin therapy after cardiac valve replacement (CVR). MethodsWe finally identified 96 patients who received additional warfarin therapy after CVR as a trial group and 78 patients without the warfarin therapy as a control group. Gene sequencing techniques were adopted to determine single nucleotide polymorphism allele. We analyzed genotype and clinical features of the two groups and explored the relationship between the different MMP2 geno-types and warfarin therapy after CVR. Logistic regression was used to analyze the correlation between genotypes and risk factors after CVR and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were performed to analyze the survival time and efficacy of patients carrying MMP2 GC and GG genotypes. ResultsThe distribution of MMP2 genotype in patients receiving warfarin therapy after surgery was different from that in patients without warfarin therapy. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that GC and GG genotypes were risk factors of complications of CVR. The proportion of GG genotype was higher in the patients with postoperative complications compared with those without. The survival time of patients carrying genotype MMP2 GG was shorter than those carrying GC genotype (P < 0.05), which reveals that the level of MMP2 GG genotype was associated with the prognosis. ConclusionG allele of MMP2 is a risk factor of complications following CVR. GG genotype is relevant to CVR and prognosis, which can be regarded as a risk factor post CVR.
Objective To explore clinical effect and safety of rivaroxaban in treatment of acute pulmonary thromboembolism at moderate risk with deep vein thrombosis of lower limbs. Methods The clinical data of 60 patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism at moderate risk with deep vein thrombosis of lower limbs, collected from January 2010 to March 2017 in Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital, were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different treatment, these patients were randomly divided into a rivaroxaban group and a control group (traditional warfarin anticoagulation), with 30 patients in each group. The clinical effect and safety were compared between two groups on the 10th day, 20th day and 30th day after treatment. Results Compared with the control group, maximum short axis diameter, ratio of right and left ventricles, systolic pulmonary artery pressure, and main pulmonary artery diameter measured by CTPA and echocardiography in the rivaroxaban group were not significantly different on the 10th day, 20th day and 30th day after treatment. However, the intragroup differences were statistically significant at different timepoint (P<0.05). Levels of N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide of two groups after treatment were significantly reduced on the 10th day, 20th day and 30th day after treatment, and the values of PO2 were significantly increased on the 10th day and 20th day after treatment (P<0.05), but no significant differences were found in the values of PO2 on 20th day and 30th day after treatment. D-dimer in the two groups was obviously increased on the 10th day after treatment but significantly declined on the 20th day and 30th day after treatment (all P<0.05). These changes were predominant in the rivaroxaban group. Conclusion Rivaroxaban is effective and safe for acute pulmonary thromboembolism at moderate risk with deep vein thrombosis of lower limbs, and worthy of clinical implementation and application.
Warfarin is one of the most frequently prescribed oral anticoagulant. Many researches have shown that the genotypes have been strongly associated with warfarin maintenance doses. Especially, it has been accepted in academia that cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) and vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1 subunit (VKORC1) could affect the warfarin maintenance doses. There are also many other genotypes that were reported to be related to warfarin doses, but the results have been in controversial so far. The studies found that the dose formula which contained the genetic factors and clinical information could accurately predict the maintenance dose of warfarin, however, its usefulness is suspected due to the inconsistent results of clinical trials. Large-sample and multi-center studies are necessary to verify the specific effects of gene and non-gene factors to warfarin dose; at the same time, testing constructed models or building new models help to improve the explained percentages of individual differences.
Objective To investigate the effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with warfarin functions and blood coagulation system, to provide the reference for clinicians of the selection of AEDs under the combination therapy with warfarin. Methods Analyse the clinical data of the patient with symptomatic epilepsy from the Second Clinical Medical College of Guiyang University of Chinese Medicine on April 1, 2017, whom taking AEDs and warfarin at the same time, clear the drug adverse reactions, and analysed related literature. Results After the treatment with valproate, abnormal blood coagulation, a danger and emergency data appeared, so we stopped using warfarin immediately, and reduce the dosage of valproate gradually, insteadly, we used levetiracetam as antiepileptic therapy. Monitoring blood coagulation function, when it returned to normal, restart warfarin anticoagulant therapy. Conclusions When start antiepileptic treatment in relevant basic diseases of symptomatic epilepsy, for a variety of combination reactions, AEDs can affect the anticoagulant effect of warfarin, so we need to consider the interaction between drugs and avoid adverse reactions.
Objective To investigate the role of clinical pharmacists in warfarin therapy. Methods A total of 134 patients underwent prosthetic heart valve replacement and had warfarin for life from March 2013 to October 2013 in Fujian Medical University Union Hospital. All patients were equally divided into two groups (an intervention and a non-intervention group) crosswise by sequence. There were 67 patients in each group. The anticoagulant effects of the two groups were compared. Results There was no statistical difference in the patients' demographic information between the two groups. However, the time for the patients to reach the target international normalized ratio(INR) values for the first time (7.1±3.3 dvs. 10.5±5.0 d,P=0.000) and time of INR in the therapy range (46.3%±18.8%vs.19.0%±16.2%,P=0.000) during their hospitalization, proportion of time of under anticoagulation (47.5%±19.5%vs. 71.2%±22.9%,P=0.000), proportion of time of anticoagulation overdose (5.3%±8.2%vs. 9.9%±16.7%,P=0.002) were significantly different. While there was no statistical difference in postoperative hospitalization time between the two groups (19.9±6.6 dvs. 18.1±7.0 d,P=0.137). There were 4 patients (6.0%) with minor hemorrhage and no severe complication was found in the intervention group. There were seven patients (10.4%) with mild hemorrhage, two patients with stroke, one patient with mild pulmonary embolism, and severe complication rate of 4.5% in the non-intervention group. Conclusion With clinical pharmacists involved in the whole anticoagulation therapy progress of patients after mechanical heart valve replacement, the time to achieve the therapeutic window for the first time is effectively shorten, and the time of the INR value controlled in therapeutic range is highly improved during hospitalization time. Moreover, the patients' risk of thrombosis and bleeding is eventually reduced.
Abstract: Objective To investigate the anticoagulation effect of warfarin on pregnant women with prosthetic mechanical heart valves during the whole course of pregnancy and their fetuses. Methods Followup survey was carried out on 103 pregnant women with prosthetic mechanical heart valves treated in the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from April 1998 to June 2010. Their age ranged from 19 and 38 years (26.4±3.8 years). All the 103 pregnant women were given oral administration of warfarin during the whole course of pregnancy. The average dose of domestic warfarin was 3.30±0.43 mg/d (87 cases), while the average dose of imported warfarin was 2.90±1.05 mg/d (16 cases). Results None of the patients suffered from serious embolic events. One patient suffered from spontaneous peritoneal hemorrhage. There were 4 cases of intrauterine deaths, and 5 cases of fetal malformation including 1 case of Down’s syndrome and 4 cases of hydrocephalus. Six cases of low birth weight infants and 1 case of ABO hemolytic disease were also found. All the other neonates were healthy with normal weight. No pregnant women suffered from postpartum hemorrhage. Conclusion Oral administration of low dose warfarin (lt;5 mg/d) during the whole course of pregnancy is a relative safe and effective anticoagulation protocol.
Warfarin is one of the most frequently prescribed oral anticoagulant. Many researches have shown that the cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) and vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1 (VKORC1) genotypes have been strongly associated with warfarin maintenance doses. Warfarin maintenance doses can be accurately predicted by use of dosing algorithms including genetic and clinical information. Although several clinical trials demonstrated mixed results, calling into question the utility of this approach. The present data do not support genetic testing to guide warfarin maintenance doses, but in the setting where genotype data are available, use of this approach is reasonable. Ongoing trials are expected to provide more data, and more work is needed to define dosing algorithms that include appropriate variables in minority populations. All these work will further improve the clinical application of genotype-guided warfarin maintenance doses.
ObjectiveTo explore the anticoagulant strategy of adjusting the dose of warfarin at different stages after mechanical valve replacement of mitral valve.MethodsClinical data of a total of 302 patients, including 76 males and 226 females, with an average age of 50.1±10.1 years, who underwent mechanical mitral valve replacement in the Chinese adult cardiac surgery database from 2013 to 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the dose adjustment strategy of taking warfarin, the patients were divided into a D group (adjusting warfarin dose in days) and a W group (adjusting warfarin dose in weeks) to evaluate the anti-coagulation effect of warfarin.ResultsThe total follow-up time was 423277 d (1159.7 years). There was no significant difference in the overall anticoagulant strength, and the warfarin dose adjusted in days was better in the early postoperative period (P<0.05), especially in patients over 60 years. It was better to adjust warfarin dose in weeks in the middle and long periods (P<0.05), especially in patients ≤40 years. In terms of the stability of anticoagulation, it was better to adjust the dosage of warfarin in weeks (P<0.05). It was better to adjust the dosage of warfarin in weeks for early, middle- and long-term anticoagulant therapy after operation (P<0.05), especially in the females aged >40 and ≤50 years.ConclusionWithin the target range of international normalized ratio (1.5-2.5), the anticoagulant strategy of adjusting warfarin dose in days after mechanical valve replacement of mitral valve can achieve a better anticoagulant strength, and adjusting the dosage of warfarin in weeks is better in the middle- and long-term after operation. In general, the anticoagulant effect is more stable in the short term when warfarin dose is adjusted on a weekly basis.