As the popularity of thoracoscopic day surgery for pulmonary nodules increases, there is a growing demand among patients for information about the surgical approach, process, and recovery. To enhance patients’ understanding of the surgery, alleviate anxiety, facilitate postoperative recovery, and improve patient satisfaction, the Day Surgery Nursing Committee of Sichuan Tianfu New Area Medical Association has convened experts in the field to discuss the health education model and content for the perioperative period of thoracoscopic pulmonary nodule day surgery, reaching an expert consensus. The consensus underscores the importance of leveraging hospital intelligent information systems and integrating diverse educational methods to provide patients with comprehensive and individualized health education.
Pectus excavatum is the most common chest wall deformity. Severe pectus excavatum can significantly impact both the physiological and psychological health of patients, necessitating timely therapeutic intervention. The Nuss procedure is currently the preferred surgical approach for treating moderate to severe pectus excavatum. However, in cases of severe pectus excavatum, the placement of the corrective steel bar through the anterior mediastinum poses a substantial risk of injury to the heart, major blood vessels, and lung tissue. This article reports a case of a 17-year-old patient with severe pectus excavatum combined with Marfan syndrome. CT examination revealed a Haller index of 14.07, with severe sternal depression leading to significant narrowing of the anterior mediastinal space and complete displacement of the heart into the left thoracic cavity, resulting in an extremely high surgical risk. We employed a simplified sternal elevation technique in conjunction with the Nuss procedure for treatment. During the operation, a sternal retractor was used to elevate the sternum, thereby enlarging the retrosternal space and facilitating the successful completion of the Nuss procedure. This approach effectively avoided damage to the heart and major blood vessels, resulted in no surgical complications, and achieved a satisfactory corrective outcome.
ObjectiveTo compare the surgical efficacy of Da Vinci robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (VAMIE) on esophageal cancer.MethodsOnline databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Medline, EMbase and CNKI from inception to 31, December 2019 were searched by two researchers independently to collect the literature comparing the clinical efficacy of RAMIE and VAMIE on esophageal cancer. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess quality of the literature. The meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3.ResultsA total of 14 studies with 1 160 patients were enrolled in the final study, and 12 studies were of high quality. RAMIE did not significantly prolong total operative time (P=0.20). No statistical difference was observed in the thoracic surgical time through the McKeown surgical approach (MD=3.35, 95%CI –3.93 to 10.62, P=0.37) or in surgical blood loss between RAMIE and VAMIE (MD=–9.48, 95%CI –27.91 to 8.95, P=0.31). While the RAMIE could dissect more lymph nodes in total and more lymph nodes along the left recurrent laryngeal recurrent nerve (MD=2.24, 95%CI 1.09 to 3.39, P=0.000 1; MD=0.89, 95%CI 0.13 to 1.65, P=0.02) and had a lower incidence of vocal cord paralysis (RR=0.70, 95%CI 0.53 to 0.92, P=0.009).ConclusionThere is no statistical difference observed between RAMIE and VAMIE in surgical time and blood loss. RAMIE can harvest more lymph nodes than VAMIE, especially left laryngeal nerve lymph nodes. RAMIE shows a better performance in reducing the left laryngeal nerve injury and a lower rate of vocal cord paralysis compared with VAMIE.