Objective To review the progress of artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics in the study of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Method The literatures related to AI, radiomics and AAA research in recent years were collected and summarized in detail. Results AI and radiomics influenced AAA research and clinical decisions in terms of feature extraction, risk prediction, patient management, simulation of stent-graft deployment, and data mining. Conclusion The application of AI and radiomics provides new ideas for AAA research and clinical decisions, and is expected to suggest personalized treatment and follow-up protocols to guide clinical practice, aiming to achieve precision medicine of AAA.
Objective To investigate the further results of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair， and analyze the midterm results of 63 cases treated by total thoraco abdominal aortic replacement with a tetrafurcate graft. Methods From August 2003 to October 2007，total thoracoabdominal aortic replacement with a tetrafurcate graft was performed in 63 consecutive patients with Crawford Ⅱ TAAA in Fu Wai Hospital. There were 46 male and 17 female with a mean age of 39.98 years (17-71 years). All the procedures were performed through combined thoracoabdominal incision via the retroperitoneal approach and underwent profound hypothermia with shorttime interval circulatory arrest. T6 to T12 intercostal arteries were reconstructed by arterial tube technique. The celiac artery， superior mesenteric artery and right renal artery were joined into a patch and anastomosed to the end of the main graft. Left renal artery was anastomosed to an 8 mm branch or joined to the visceral arterial patch. The other 10 mm branches were anastomosed to iliac arteries. KaplanMeier method was used to perform survival analysis. Results All the cases were followed，and the mean followup time was 36.57(8-57) months. No patient died during the operation. Early mortality rate was 7.94%（5/63）. Among them， 4 patients died of multiple organ failure. Two of them were caused by neurological complications, and the other 2 of them were caused by renal failure. One patient died of low cardiac output syndrome after surgery because of coronary artery disease. This patient underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) emergently, but couldn’t wean from cardiopulmonary bypass. The incidence of stroke and temporary neurological dysfunction was 9.52%（6/63）, 4 of them were temporary neurological dysfunction and were cured before discharged from hospital. Paraplegia and paraparesis occurred in 2 and 1, respectively. They were all [CM(158.3mm]cured before leaving hospital. Pulmonary complication was 25.40%(16/63)， and12 of them were cured. Pseudoaneurysmal change was observed in reconstructed intercostal arteries in 2 patients with Marfan syndrome, but neither of them underwent paraplegia or paraparesis. One patient died at 20th, 23rd, 30th month after discharge, respectively. The survival time of this group was 50.64±2.13 months（95%CI：46.47,54.84 months） with a survival rate of 92.06% after 1 year， 88.38% after 2 years， 86.11% after 3 years. Conclusion Using tetrafurcate graft is a reliable method in total thoracoabdominal aortic replacement and has a satisfactory midterm survival rate. The intercostal arteries reconstruction by arterial tube technique in total thoracoabdominal replacement is simple, and it is helpful in spinal cord protection.
Abstract： Objective To study the spinal cord protection effect of cerebrospinal fluid drainage （CSFD）for patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Methods We randomly allocated 30 patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery in Beijing Anzhen Hospital from December 2008 to August 2009 into a CSFD group with 15 patients（12 males, 3 females; average age of 45.0 years） and a control group with 15 patients（11 males, 4 females; average age at 45.8 years）by computer. All the patients underwent replacement of ascending aorta and aortic arch, implantation of descending aorta stent, or thoracoabdominal aorta replacement. Some patients underwent Bentall operation or replacement of half aortic arch. Patients in the CSFD group also underwent CSFD. Serum S100B, glial fibrillary acidic protein and neuron-specific enolase were measured at set intraoperative and postoperative times. All the patients were scored preoperatively, 72 hours postoperatively, and before discharge according to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. Results Central nervous system injury occurred in four patients in the control group： one died of both brain damage and spinal cord damage; one patient had spinal cord injury and became better after treatment by early CSFD; two patients had brain damage（one patient died, another patient had concomitant acute renal failure and acute respiratory failure, recovered and was discharged after treatment）. In the CSFD group, only one patient died of acute respiratory failure and subsequent multiple organ system failure, and all other patients recovered very well. There was no late death during three months follow-up in both groups. The average serum S100B, glial fibrillary acidic protein，and neuron-specific enolase concentrations of the CSFD group patients were significantly lower than those of the control group （F=7.153，P=0.012；F=3.263，P=0.082；F=4.927，P=0.035）. Conclusion Selected CSFD is a safe, effective and feasible procedure to protect the spinal cord from ischemic damage during the perioperative period of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.
Objective To explore the method of surgical treatment and endoluminal repairs of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)so as to improve the safety of surgical treatment. Methods The information of surgical treatment was analysed restrospectively in 195 cases of infrarenal AAA treated from January 1981 to December 2004. Of the patients, 155 were males, 40 were females with a mean age of 56.5 years. The diametersof the aneurysm were larger than 5 cm in 183 patients (93.8%) and 4 to 5 cm in12 patients (6.2%). Of the 175 patients who underwent selective operation, graft replacements were performed in 139 and endovascular aneurysmal repairs in 36. Twenty patients (10.3%) suffering from aneurysm rupture were given emergency operation. Results There were 6 deaths in the patients underdingselective operation(6/175, 4.3%) and in those undergoing emergengcy surgery (6/20, 30%) respectively within 30 days. The other patients were followed up from 1 month to 21 years ( 8.7 years on average), and there were 16 deaths (8.9%) during the follow-up. Nodeath was found in the endoluminal repaired group. Endoleak occurred in 8 patients, including 5 cases of type Ⅰand 3cases of type Ⅱ. After 6 months, CT scan showed that endoleak disappeared in 6 and rernained in 2. Late type Ⅱ endoleak occurred in 1 and endoleak disappearedafter endoluminal embolization. Conclusion With improvement of vascular surgical technique and development of endogafting, the safety of AAA both on surgicaland interventional means would be improved.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of relationship between distal landing zone geometric and outcomes of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm. MethodsThe domestic and foreign literature on the accumulation of the impact of proximal and distal landing zone geometric morphology on clinical outcomes, the evaluation methods for related complications of proximal and distal landing zones, preventive measures for adverse outcomes related to the geometric morphology of the distal landing zone, and the pathophysiological mechanisms of complications related to the distal landing zone were retrieved to make an review. ResultsThe irregular geometric morphology of the proximal landing zone was closely associated with adverse events following EVAR. The morphology of the distal landing zone was actually more complex than that of the proximal zone, and the measurement methods for its parameters were also more complicated. Common methods used in the literature for studying landing zones included the centerline distance method, the minimum distance method, and the landing area method. Primary preventive measures for adverse outcomes related to the geometry of the distal landing zone included increasing radial support force and contact area, using endostaples, and extending the landing zone. In addition to anatomical factors, the distal landing zone was also influenced by various pathophysiological factors. ConclusionsThe morphology and related pathological changes of the distal landing zone significantly impact the clinical outcomes following EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm. However, current research on the distal landing zone is limited. Future studies should focus on developing new technologies and methods to improve the evaluation and management of the distal landing zone, thereby reducing the complications after EVAR, enhancing the success rate of the surgery, and improving patient survival quality.
Objective To explore the diagnosis and treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA). Methods Between January 1996 and December 2009, 14 patients with RAAA were treated. There were 13 males and 1 female with an average age of 65 years (range, 50-82 years). The main cl inical manifestations were abdominal pain and/or back pain. Ten cases had low blood pressure or shock. All cases were accurately diagnosed with CT, Doppler ultrasonography,or operation. The aneurysm diameter was from 4.5 cm to 8.0 cm. Eleven cases were treated by conventional operation, 1 by endovascular aortic repair, 1 by conservative treatment, and 1 case died after admission treatment. Results Perioperative death occurred in 6 cases (mortal ity rate was 50%) in 12 surgical patients. One case died after conservative treatment. The overall mortal ity rate was 57.14% (8/14). The causes of death included circulatory failure in 2 cases and multiple organ failure in 4 cases. The other 6 cases were cured. The postoperative hospital ization days were 12 to 34 days (14 days on average). A total of 4 cases were followed up 11 to 40 months without related compl ication. Conclusion Surgical treatment is still a main method to treat RAAA. Early diagnosis, appropriate resuscitation, and urgent surgical repair are crucial to reduce the mortal ity rate of RAAA.
The surgical treatment of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) requires a unique multidisciplinary approach. A thorough preoperative examination and evaluation are essential to determine the optimal timing for surgery and to optimize organ function as needed. During the perioperative period, excellent surgical skills and an appropriate strategy for extracorporeal circulation will be employed based on the extent of the aneurysm. Additionally, necessary measures will be taken to monitor and protect the functions of vital organs. Close monitoring and management in the postoperative stage, along with early detection of complications and effective treatment, are crucial for improving the prognosis of TAAA surgery. This article reviews the current research progress in the perioperative management of TAAA surgery.
ObjectiveTo explore the efficacy and safety of hybrid surgery in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). MethodsTwenty patients who were diagnosed with TAAA (including chronic thoracoabdominal aortic dissection aneurysm) and underwent hybrid surgery in Vascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University were enrolled between January 2015 and December 2022. All the patients underwent retrograde reconstruction for visceral arteries in the open surgery. Additionally, one-stage or two-stage endovascular aortic repair with covered stents was performed. The patients’ clinical baseline information was collected. Moreover, the patients received clinical follow-up and imaging examinations postoperatively, whose informationwas collected. ResultsOne patient developed paraplegia and acute renal failure 16 days postoperatively in the hospital, and subsequently died in the hospital due to septic shock. Another patient underwent exploratory laparotomy for hemostasis due to anastomotic bleeding in the hospital. The other patients did not experience serious complications perioperatively. Nineteen patients were discharged from the hospital with long-term follow-up ranging from 10 to 144 months (median time: 48 months), and all of them had a long-term survival. No patients were observed with paraplegia, myocardial infarction, stroke, or rupture of aneurysm. None of the patients received reintervention during the follow-up, except for one patient who underwent ultrasound-guided puncture and suctionin the aneurysmallumen. ConclusionHybrid surgery is an effective treatment for TAAA with favorable short- and long-term safety and efficacy.
Objective To compare the effectiveness between conventional open repair (OR) and endovascular repair (EVRAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Methods Between March 2000 and July 2011, 48 cases of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm were treated by conventional OR in 40 cases (OR group) or by EVRAR in 8 cases (EVRAR group). There was no significant difference in age, sex, the neck length (less than 2 cm), the neck angulation of aneurysm (more than60°), il iac severe tortuosity, preoperative systol ic pressure, and preoperative comorbidity between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The blood transfusion volume, operation time, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, postoperative complications, reinterventions, and mortality were analyzed. Results There was no significant difference in 24-hour and 30-day mortality rates and non graft-related complications between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). EVRAR group was significantly better than OR group in blood transfusion volume, operation time, and ICU stay (P lt; 0.05), but OR group was significantly better than EVRAR group in reinterventions and graftrelated complications (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion EVRAR has obvious advantages in blood transfusion volume, operation time, and ICU stay, so it is feasible for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients with precise anatomical suitability.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (F-EVAR) and chimney endovascular aortic repair (Ch-EVAR) in treatment of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (JRAAA).MethodsThe databases including the PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, etc. were searched to collect the randomized controlled trails (RCTs) and non-RCTs about the F-EVAR versus Ch-EVAR for the JRAAA. The retrieval time was from inception to November 2019. The studies were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the data were extracted and the quality was evaluated by 2 reviewers independently. Then the meta-analysis was conducted using the RevMan 5.1 software.ResultsA total of 9 non-RCTs involving 536 patients were included, 315 of whom were in the F-EVAR group, 221 of whom were in the Ch-EVARF group. The results of meta-analysis showed that: Compared with the F-EVAR group, the Ch-EVAR group had a higher incidence of type Ⅰ endoleak [OR=0.31, 95%CI (0.12, 0.85), P=0.02] and a lower incidence of target organ injury [OR=2.96, 95%CI (1.30, 6.72), P=0.010]. But there were no differences in the technical success rate, vascular restenosis, re-intervention rate, and 30 d mortality between the 2 groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsBoth F-EVAR and Ch-EVAR are safe and effective treatments for JRAAA. F-EVAR has a relative low incidence of type Ⅰ endoleak, but a relatively high incidence of target organ damage. However, for the limitation of quantity and quality of the included studies, this conclusion still requires to be further proved by performing large scale and high quality RCTs. It suggests that doctors should choose a best therapy for patients with JRAAA according to an integrative disease assessment.