ObjectiveTo analyze the risk factors for esophagogastric anastomotic leakage (EGAL) after esophageal cancer surgery, and to establish a risk prediction model for early prevention and treatment.MethodsClinical data of patients undergoing esophagectomy in our hospital from January 2013 to October 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The independent risk factors for postoperative EGAL were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, and a clinical nomogram prediction model was established. According to whether EGAL occurred after operation, the patients were divided into an anastomotic fistula group and a non-anastomotic fistula group.ResultsA total of 303 patiens were enrolled, including 267 males and 36 females with a mean age of 62.30±7.36 years. The incidence rate of postoperative EGAL was 15.2% (46/303). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that high blood pressure, chronic bronchitis, peptic ulcer, operation way, the number of lymph node dissected, anastomotic way, the number of intraoperative chest drainage tube, tumor location, no-supplementing albumin in the first three days after operation, postoperative pulmonary infection, postoperative use of bronchoscope were the independent risk factors for EGAL after esophageal cancer surgery (P<0.05). A prognostic nomogram model was established based on these factors with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.954 (95%CI 0.924-0.975), indicating a high predictive value.ConclusionThe clinical prediction model based on 11 perioperative risk factors in the study has a good evaluation efficacy and can promote the early detection, diagnosis and treatment of EGAL.
Objective To understand the changes of intestinal flora during perioperative period of colorectal cancer and the mechanism affecting the occurrence of postoperative anastomotic leakage, so as to improve perioperative management of patients and find possible measures to decrease the incidence rate of anastomotic leakage. Method The literature related to perioperative intestinal flora assessment, anastomotic healing, and anastomotic leakage of colorectal cancer in recent years was comprehensively searched in the CNKI, PubMed, and Embase databases and made an review. ResultsDue to the various perioperative interventions, the diversity and abundance of intestinal flora had changed after colorectal cancer surgery, and some conditional pathogenic bacteria such as Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, etc. increased obviously, which led to collagen degradation through the expression of bacterial collagenase or the excessive activation of matrix metalloproteinases in the host intestine, then might lead to the poor anastomotic healing and even the anastomotic leakage. ConclusionAlthough the evidence of effect of intestinal flora on anastomotic leakage mainly comes from animal experiments, it still shows the potential role of intestinal flora in the occurrence of anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery, and can be regulated by perioperative intervention, which suggests that it may provide a new strategy for prevention of anastomotic leakage.
Objective To explore the strategy of intrathoracic anastomosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma when the proximal esophagus is dilated to different degrees and explore its mechanism. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients who underwent esophagectomy between 2014 and 2017 in West China Hospital. The patients were divided into two groups including a significant dilatation group with inner mucosal phase diameter (IMPD)≥17.9 mm and a non-significant dilatation group with IMPD<17.9 mm. And the patients were divided into two groups (a layered manual anastomosis group and a stapled anastomosis group) according to anastomosis method and propensity score matching was applied to adjust for potential confounders. Results We finally included 654 patients. There were 206 patients with 158 males and 48 females at average age of 62.21±7.72 years in the layerd manual analstomosis group and 448 patietns with 377 males and 71 females at average age of 62.57±8.42 years in the stapled anastomosis group. We also used Masson trichrome staining to assess the collagen fiber content in the esophagus. Compared with layered manual anastomosis, the incidence of anastomotic leakage was higher in the significant dilatation group than that in the stapled anastomosis group (original cohort: 3.8% vs. 10.7%, P=0.093; propensity score-matched cohort: 1.4% vs. 15.3%, P=0.004). And there was no significant difference in anastomotic leakage b etween layered manual anastomosis and stapled anastomosis in the non-significant dilatation group (original cohort: 4.7% vs. 4.2%, P=0.830; propensity score-matched cohort: 4.8% vs. 4.0%, P=0.206). Moreover, the average collagen fiber area ratio was significantly lower in the significant dilation group than that in the non-significant dilatation group (P=0.045). Conclusion There is a significant reduction in collagen fibers in the proximal esophageal wall tissue of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with a IMPD≥17.9 mm. Intrathoracic layered manual anastomosis effectively reduces postoperative anastomotic leakage in these patients.
Objective To confirm the difference between internal and external pressure of cervical esophageal and to discuss the relations between cervical esophageal pressure difference with the formation of cervical anastomotic leakage. Methods In the present study, 12 New Zealand white rabbits were used. We applied a pressure transducer to describe the variation of pressure of intrathoracic, thoracic esophagus, cervical esophagus and upper esophageal sphincter during resting and cough. Pressure value was recorded and read through MD3000 system. And the difference between each point was analyzed. Results The pressures resulting from the cough induced were significantly higher in intrathoracic than in thoracical esophagous (10.2±0.6 cm H2O vs. 36.7±1.0 cm H2O), exhibited significantly higher in upper esophageal sphincter and thoracic esophagous than in cervical esophageal (7.5±0.2 cm H2O vs. 12.0±0.4 cm H2O, vs. 10.2±0.6 cm H2O). Conclusion Cervical anastomotic leaks are affected by many factors.And the most notabe one is the constant pressure from inside-out around cervical anastomotic.
ObjectiveTo study the clinical significance of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) combined with neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in predicting the occurrence of anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.MethodsTo retrospectively analyze and collect the clinical data of 517 patients with gastric cancer who were diagnosed at the Third People’s Hospital of Shangqiu City from January 2016 to May 2020, all of the patients received radical gastrectomy. We explored the risk factors that affect the occurrence of postoperative anastomotic leakage, and explored the clinical significance of PNI combined with NLR on the third day after operation in predicting the occurrence of anastomotic leakage.ResultsAmong 517 patients undergoing radical gastrectomy, 61 had anastomotic leakage, and the incidence of anastomotic leakage was 11.8%. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients with preoperative diabetes and intraoperative blood loss ≥400 mL had a higher incidence of anastomotic leakage, and with the increase of NLR value on the 3rd and 5th day after operation, and the decrease of PNI value on the 3rd and 5th day after operation, the incidence of anastomotic leakage increased (P<0.05). The area under the curve of NLR, PNI, and NLR combined with PNI on the 3rd day after operation in predicting the occurrence of anastomotic leakage were 0.849, 0.581, and 0.949, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05), the sensitivity and specificity of NLR combined with PNI were higher than the individual indicator.ConclusionPNI combined with NLR on the 3rd day after operation has important clinical significance in predicting the occurrence of anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
ObjectiveTo investigate the diagnostic value of intra-intestinal angiography CT in patients with anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal cancer resection.MethodsPatients who admitted to The Department of General Surgery of The No. 900 Hospital of The Joint Logistic Team from January 2013 to October 2018, who were diagnosed with rectal cancer and underwent rectal cancer resection with sphincter preserving surgery, were retrospectively collected in the study. All patients underwent routine imaging examination on the 7th day after rectal cancer operation. The retrograde contrast enema (RCE) was performed to obtain the abdominal X-ray film, then the pelvic CT scan was performed to get the CT image of the intestinal lumen. The films were reviewed by 2 senior radiologists, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of RCE and intra-intestinal angiography CT in the diagnosis of AL after rectal cancer resection were evaluated. Evaluated the sensitivity of the CT image feature to predict AL after rectal cancer resection.ResultsThe sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of RCE in the diagnosis of AL after the rectal cancer resection were 69.23% (18/26), 98.64% (218/221), 85.71% (18/21), and 96.46% (218/226) respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of intra-intestinal angiography CT were 96.15% (25/26), 99.09% (219/221), 92.59% (25/27), and 99.54% (219/220) respectively. The sensitivity and NPV of intra-intestinal angiography CT in diagnosis of AL were significantly higher than those of RCE (P<0.05). The sensitivity of contrast agent leakage to diagnosis of AL was the highest, reaching 96.15% (25/26).ConclusionsThe sensitivity of intra-intestinal angiography CT in the diagnosis of AL is high and the overall diagnostic efficiency is better than RCE, and the leakage of contrast agent is the main imaging feature of AL. It is significant to guide the clinical practice.
ObjectiveTo analyze the risk factors of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.MethodsThe clinical data of 1 328 patients with esophageal cancer, who underwent esophagectomy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology from January 2010 to December 2016, were retrospectively analyzed. There were 726 males and 602 females, at an average age of 67.2±14.1 years. According to whether there was anastomotic leakage after operation, patients were divided into two groups: an anastomotic leakage group (167 patients) and a non-anastomotic leakage group (1 161 patients). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify related risk factors of anastomotic leakage after operation.Results The incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage was 12.6% (167/1 328). Univariate analysis showed that body mass index, arrhythmia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, preoperative albumin level, preoperative chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, lesion location, anastomosis types and postoperative pulmonary infection were associated with statistically significant increase in risk of cervical anastomotic leakage (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative COPD, lesion location and postoperative pulmonary infection were independent risk factors of cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy (P<0.05).ConclusionThe occurrence of cervical anastomotic leakage after esophageal cancer is related to many factors. The preoperative COPD, the lesion location and the postoperative pulmonary infection are independent high risk factors. Paying attention to these factors and doing perioperative management can effectively reduce the occurrence of anastomotic leakage.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the risk prediction models for anastomotic leakage (AL) in patients with esophageal cancer after surgery. MethodsA computer-based search of PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Chinese Medical Journal Full-text Database, VIP, Wanfang, SinoMed and CNKI was conducted to collect studies on postoperative AL risk prediction model for esophageal cancer from their inception to October 1st, 2023. PROBAST tool was employed to evaluate the bias risk and applicability of the model, and Stata 15 software was utilized for meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 19 literatures were included covering 25 AL risk prediction models and 7373 patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.670-0.960. Among them, 23 prediction models had a good prediction performance (AUC>0.7); 13 models were tested for calibration of the model; 1 model was externally validated, and 10 models were internally validated. Meta-analysis showed that hypoproteinemia (OR=9.362), postoperative pulmonary complications (OR=7.427), poor incision healing (OR=5.330), anastomosis type (OR=2.965), preoperative history of thoracoabdominal surgery (OR=3.181), preoperative diabetes mellitus (OR=2.445), preoperative cardiovascular disease (OR=3.260), preoperative neoadjuvant therapy (OR=2.977), preoperative respiratory disease (OR=4.744), surgery method (OR=4.312), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (OR=2.424) were predictors for AL after esophageal cancer surgery. ConclusionAt present, the prediction model of AL risk in patients with esophageal cancer after surgery is in the development stage, and the overall research quality needs to be improved.
Objective To compare the safety of manual anastomosis and mechanical anastomosis after esophagectomy by meta-analysis. MethodsThe randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about manual anastomosis and mechanical anastomosis after esophagectomy were searched from PubMed, EMbase and The Cochrane Library from inception to January 2018 by computer, without language restrictions. Two authors according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria independently researched literature, extracted data, evaluated bias risk and used R software meta package for meta-analysis. Results Seventeen RCTs were enrolled, including 2 159 patients (1 230 by manual anastomosis and 1 289 by mechanical anastomosis). The results of meta-analysis showed that: (1) there was no significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic leakage between mechanical and manual anastomosis (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.67–1.48, P=0.181); (2) no significant difference was found in the 30-day mortality (RR=0.95, 95%CI 0.61–1.49, P=0.631); (3) compared with manual anastomosis, the mechanical anastomosis group may increase the risk of anastomotic stenosis (RR=0.74, 95%CI 0.48-1.14, P<0.001). Conclusion Esophageal cancer surgery using a linear or circular stapler can increase the incidence of anastomotic stenosis after surgery. There is no significant difference in the anastomotic leakage and 30-day mortality between manual anastomosis, linear stapler and circular stapler.
ObjectiveTo explore the predictive value of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) combined with neutrophil-monocyte ratio (NMR) on postoperative anastomotic leakage in elderly colon cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of 493 elderly colon cancer patients who attended the Department of General Surgery of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University from January 2018 to October 2023 were retrospectively analysed, and divided into an anastomotic leakage group (n=29) and a non-anastomotic leakage group (n=464) according to the occurrence of anastomotic leakage or not, and the differences between the two groups in terms of SII and NMR at different time points were compared. Area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to compare the predictive value of SII, NMR and the combination of the two on the occurrence of anastomotic leakage after surgery in elderly colon cancer patients. Logistic regression was used to analyse the independent risk factors for postoperative anastomotic leakage in elderly colon cancer patients. ResultsThe SII and NMR in the anastomotic leakage group were higher than those in the non-anastomotic leakage group on the 3 rd and 5 th day after operation (P<0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC values for SII on postoperative day 3, NMR on postoperative day 5, and the combination of the two to predict anastomotic leakage were 0.613, 0.743, and 0.750, respectively. The results of DeLong’s test suggested that the difference between the AUC values of NMR on postoperative day 5 combined with SII on postoperative day 3 and SII on postoperative day 3 was statistically significant (P=0.047). Multifactorial logistic regression analysis showed that age, male, diabetes, preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy, tumor located in the left colon, SII on postoperative day 3, and NMR on postoperative day 5 were independent risk factors for postoperative anastomotic leakage in elderly patients with colorectal cancer (all P<0.05). ConclusionsPostoperative day 3 SII combined with postoperative day 5 NMR, postoperative day 3 SII, and postoperative day 5 NMR all have predictive value for postoperative anastomotic leakage in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Both have the potential to serve as important predictors of postoperative anastomotic leakage in elderly patients with colon cancer.