Objective To discusses the feasibilities of the hybrid surgical treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissection. Methods From August 2011 to August 2015 a total of 14 cases of complex Stanford type B aortic dissection patients had been completed hybrid surgery. Among them 11 cases of men and 3 cases of women, aged 22 to 62, an average of 44±7.2 years old. Twelve cases with dissecting aneurysm involving the aortic arch and its three vascular branch. There were 2 cases of patients after TEVER, occurred new dissection or pseudoaneurysms, and had hybrid surgery by traditional thoracotomy; 3 cases involving carotid artery were received neck-neck hybrid surgery, and 7 cases involving left subclavian artery were received neck-lock hybrid surgery. Two cases of dissecting aneurysm involving the iliac artery to thrombosis that result in lower limb ischemia, then femoral to femoral artery hybrid surgery were performed. Results All the patients were successfully completed the operation of covered stent implantation and hybrid surgery. Intraoperative angiography showed that the position of the stent was accurate, the interlayer isolation was successful, there was no obvious leakage and displacement of the stent, the true lumen blood flow of the aortic dissection was returned to normal, and bypass blood and target blood vessels were unobstructed. Fourteen patients were followed-up for a period of 3 to 36 months, with an average of (24.0±8.2) months. In 1 month after operation, pleural effusion occurred in 1 case, there was 1 case of cerebral stroke in two days after surgery, incision hematoma occurred in 1 case in 10 days after surgery, and the other patients had no postoperative death and severe complications. All 14 patients were followed-up and returned to normal life. Conclusion The hybrid operations can increase the success rate of TEVAR in complex Stanford type B aortic dissection patients, and early and mid-term results are satisfactory.
Objective To analyze the risk factors and prognosis of acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) early after acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair, and develop the Nomogram prediction model of AGI. Methods The patients who underwent ATAAD cardiopulmonary bypass surgery in our hospital from 2016 to 2021 were collected and divided into an AGI group and a non-AGI group. The clinical data of the two groups were compared. A Nomogram prediction model was established by using R language. Results A total of 188 patients were enrolled, including 166 males and 22 females, aged 22-70 (49.70±9.96) years. Through multivariate logistic regression analysis, the aortic dissection (AD) risk score, poor perfusion of superior mesenteric artery (SMA), duration of aortic occlusion and intraoperative infusion of red blood cells were the predictors for AGI (P<0.05). There were statistical differences in the ventilator-assisted duration, ICU stay time, liver dysfunction, renal insufficiency, parenteral nutrition, nosocomial infection and death within 30 days after the operation between the two groups (P<0.05). The Nomogram prediction model was established by using the prediction factors, and the C index was 0.888. Through internal verification, the C index was 0.848. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the discrimination of the model, and the area under the curve was 0.888. Conclusion The AD risk score after ATAAD, poor perfusion of SMA, duration of aortic occlusion and intraoperative infusion of red blood cells are independent predictors for AGI. The Nomogram model has good prediction ability.
Aortic dissection is a disease with high mortality rates. Due to the urgency of time, the diagnosis, treatment processes, and strategies of acute aortic dissection follow specific guidelines. However, patients with chronic aortic dissection are often neglected. Choosing the best medication therapy and surgical interventions remains challenging, and there is still a lack of guideline recommendations. With the improvement of imaging diagnostic methods for aortic diseases, the progress of endovascular surgical techniques, and the development of new endovascular graft devices in recent years, clinical data of the treatment of chronic aortic dissection is also gradually increasing. This article summarized the current new technologies and clinical research results for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic aortic dissection, aiming to provide new suggestions for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic aortic dissection.
ObjectiveTo discuss the efficacy of type Ⅱ hybrid aortic arch repair for type A aortic dissection in patients of different age groups.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 126 patients with type A aortic dissection admitted to the Fuwai Hospital between January 2016 and December 2018, including 78 (61.9%) males and 48 (38.1%) females, with an average age of 61.8±6.9 years. The patients were divided into an elderly group (≥60 years, n=82) and a non-elderly group (<60 years, n=44). The preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data of patients in the two groups were compared.ResultsThe age between the elderly and non-elderly group was significantly different (65.9±4.1 years vs. 54.3±4.1 years, P<0.010), and no significant difference was found between the two groups in other preoperative baseline data. There were 6 (4.8%) patients of early death, 3 (2.4%) patients of stroke and 2 (1.6%) patients of paralysis. A total of 194 stents were implanted, and the average dimeter of the stents was 33.6±1.8 mm and the average length was 199.0±6.7 mm. The non-elderly group had shorter mechanical ventilation time (31.9±41.7 h vs. 61.0±89.2 h, P=0.043) and ICU stay time (77.8±51.4 h vs. 143.1±114.4 h, P<0.001) than the elderly group. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality rate, reoperation rate or survival rate between the two groups (P>0.05). Follow-up time was 1-43 (22.6±10.8) months, and 3 patients were lost. There were 104 (82.5%) patients of complete thrombus formation of false lumen in stent and endoleak was reported in 11 (9.2%) patients.ConclusionType Ⅱ hybrid aortic arch repair offers an alternative approach to acute type A aortic dissection with acceptable early and mid-term clinical effects. The non-elderly patients have a similar early treatment effect to the elderly patients, but have a better mid-term outcome.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of proximal aortic repair (PAR) versus total arch replacement (TAR) for treatment of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). Methods An electronic search was conducted for clinical controlled studies on PAR versus TAR for patients with ATAAD published in Medline via PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang Database and CNKI since their inception up to April 30, 2022. The quality of each study included was assessed by 2 evaluators and the necessary data were extracted. STATA 16 software was used to perform statistical analysis of the available data. ResultsA total of 28 cohort studies involving 7 923 patients with ATAAD were included in this meta-analysis, of whom 5 710 patients received PAR and 2 213 patients underwent TAR, and 96.43% of the studies (27/28) were rated as high quality. The meta-analysis results showed that: (1) patients who underwent PAR had lower incidences of 30 d mortality [RR=0.62, 95%CI (0.50, 0.77), P＜0.001], in-hospital mortality [RR=0.64, 95%CI (0.54, 0.77), P＜0.001], and neurologic deficiency after surgery [RR=0.84, 95%CI (0.72, 0.98), P=0.032] than those who received TAR; (2) the cardiopulmonary bypass time [WMD=–52.07, 95%CI (–74.19, –29.94), P＜0.001], circulatory arrest time [WMD=–10.14, 95%CI (–15.02, –5.26), P＜0.001], and operation time [WMD=–101.68, 95%CI (–178.63, –24.73), P＜0.001] were significantly shorter in PAR than those in TAR; (3) there was no statistical difference in mortality after discharge, rate of over 5-year survival, renal failure after surgery and re-intervention, volume of red blood cells transfusion and fresh-frozen plasma transfusion, or hospital stay between two surgical procedures. Conclusion Compared with TAR, PAR has a shorter operation time and lower early and in-hospital mortality, but there is no difference in long-term outcomes or complications between the two procedures for patients with ATAAD.
ObjectiveTo summarize clinical outcomes of different end-to-end anastomotic methods for surgical treatment of acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (AD). MethodsBetween January 2012 and May 2013, 95 patients with acute Stanford type A AD received surgical treatment in Nanjing Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University. According to different end-to-end anastomotic methods, 72 patients were divided into 3 groups (23 patients undergoing Bentall procedure were excluded from this study). In group A, there were 23 patients including 18 males and 5 females with their age of 48.67±9.23 years, who received 'sandwich' anastomotic technique strengthening both the inner and outer layers of the aortic wall. In group B, there were 11 patients including 8 males and 3 females with their age of 48.00±9.17 years, who received pericardium strengthening only inner layer of the aortic wall. In group C, there were 38 patients including 29 males and 9 females with their age of 49.20±8.57 years, who received artificial graft that was anastomosed directly to the aortic wall without any reinforcement. Postoperative outcomes were compared among the 3 groups. ResultsEight patients (11.11%)died postoperatively including 1 patient in group A (1/23, 4.35%)and 7 patients in group C (7/38, 18.42%). One patient in group A died of persistent wound errhysis and later disseminated intravascular coagulation. Three patients in group C died of persistent anastomotic incision errhysis and circulatory failure. Four patients in group C died of postopera-tive severe tricuspid regurgitation, secondary severe low cardiac output syndrome and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Severe postoperative complications included renal failure in 5 patients, respiratory failure in 7 patients, severe cerebral infarction and paralysis in 1 patient, paresis in 3 patients, delayed recovery of consciousness in 2 patients, and ischemic necrosis of the lower limb in 1 patient. Postoperative thoracic drainage amount in group C was significantly larger than that of the other 2 groups, and there was no statistical difference in thoracic drainage amount between group A and group B. Sixty-four patients were followed up for 1 to 6 months, and there was no late death during follow-up. Among the 5 patients with postoperative renal failure, only 1 patient needed regular hemodialysis, and renal function of the other 4 patients returned to normal. One patient with cerebral infarction recovered partial limb function and was able to walk with crutches. All the 3 patients with paresis recovered their limb function. ConclusionsAnastomotic quality of end-to-end anastomosis is of crucial importance for surgical treatment of acute Stanford type A AD. Appropriate reinforcement methods can be chosen according to individual intraoperative findings. 'sandwich' anastomotic technique can significantly reduce incision errhysis, prevent acute myocardial infarction caused by aortic anastomotic tear, and decrease postoperative mortality. If coronary ostia are involved in AD, concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting is needed.
ObjectiveTo investigate the prognosis and impact of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) on patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (ATAAD), and to analyze the predictors for short- and medium-term survival. MethodsClinical data of patients who underwent ATAAD surgery in Qingdao Municipal Hospital from May 2014 to May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. All discharged patients underwent telephone or outpatient follow-up, and were divided into an AKI group and a non-AKI group based on whether AKI occurred after surgery. The impact of postoperative AKI on the short- and medium-term prognosis was analyzed, and multivariate Cox analysis was used to screen the risk factors for short- and medium-term mortality. ResultsA total of 192 patients were collected, including 139 males and 53 females, with an average age of 53.3±11.4 years. Postoperative AKI was identified in 43 (22.4%) patients. The average follow-up time of discharged patients was 23.4±2.4 months, and the lost rate was 5.1%. The two-year survival rate after discharge of the AKI group was 88.2%, and that of the non-AKI group was 97.2%. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test showed that there was a statistical difference between the two groups (χ2=5.355, log-rank P=0.021). Multivariate Cox analysis results showed that age (HR=1.070, 95%CI 1.026 to 1.116, P=0.002), cardiopulmonary bypass time (HR=1.026, 95%CI 1.003 to 1.050, P=0.026), postoperative AKI (HR=3.681, 95%CI 1.579 to 8.582, P=0.003), transfusion volume of red blood cell intraoperatively and within 24 hours postoperatively (HR=1.548, 95%CI 1.183 to 2.026, P=0.001) were independent risk factors for the short- and medium-term mortality of ATAAD patients. ConclusionThe incidence of postoperative AKI is high in ATAAD patients, and the mortality of patients with AKI increases significantly within two years. Age, cardiopulmonary bypass time and transfusion volume of red blood cell intraoperatively and within 24 hours postoperatively are also independent risk factors for short- and medium-term prognosis.
Abstract： Objective To evaluate surgical outcomes of patients with Marfan syndrome （MFS） complicated by type A aortic dissection （AAD） during follow-up. Methods We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 44 patients with MFS complicated by AAD who were admitted to Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital from January 2006 to January 2012. There were 31 male patients and 13 female patients with their age of 12-54 （33.0±9.8） years. Twenty-three patients underwent Bentall procedure at different time after the onset of AAD， while the other 21 patients received conservative treatment in stead of surgery because of economical or other reasons. COX regression with time-varying covariates was performed to analyze related factors， using primary end point， primary end point＋secondary end point as the outcome variables respectively， to compare postoperative outcomes and quality of life between the surgical treatment patients and conservative treatment patients. Results Postoperatively 1 patient died of multiple organ failure， and the other 22 patients survived the surgery. All the 43 patients were followed up from 1 to 75 months. The 3-year survival rate of the 22 surgical treatment patients was 95.7%， and they all had a good quality of life during follow-up. The survival condition and quality of life of the 21 conservative treatment patients was poor， and 13 patients （61.9%） died with the 3-year survival rate of only 31.7%. The main causes of their death included acute cardiac tamponade， aortic dissection rupture， acute myocardial infarction andcardiogenic shock. COX regression with time-varying covariates showed that the treatment outcomes of the surgical treatment patients were statistically different from those of the conservative treatment patients after modifying the influence caused by different operating time （OR of T_COV_ =0.088， P=0.028） . The risk of death of surgical treatment was only 8.8% of that of conservative treatment. Conclusion The prognosis of patients with MFS complicated by AAD is very poor. Therefore， all these patient， both in acute stage and chronic stage， should undergo surgical treatment as early as possible. The short-term and follow-up outcomes of surgical treatment are satisfactory.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the results of a hybrid procedure for treating Stanford type B1C aortic dissection.MethodsIn our center, 49 patients with Stanford type B1C aortic dissection underwent supra-arch branch vessel bypass and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) from December 2013 to December 2017. There were 33 males and 16 females with an average age of 60.4±5.5 years. Left common carotid artery to left subclavian artery bypass (n=29), right common carotid artery to left common carotid artery and left subclavian artery bypass (n=18), left common carotid artery to left subclavian artery and right common carotid artery to right subclavian artery bypass (n=2) were performed.ResultsEarly mortality rate was 2.0% (1/49). Forty-eight patients survived postoperatively. The follow-up rate was 100.0% (48/48). The patients were followed up for 6 to 47 (26.8±11.9) months postoperatively. Chest pain relapsed in one patient 8 months after the operation. The whole aorta CTA showed type A1S aortic dissection in one patient 6 months after the operation, and the re-operation was satisfactory. There was no endoleak or paraplegia.ConclusionInitial results suggest that the one-stage hybrid procedure is a suitable therapeutic option for type B1C aortic dissection.
Aortic dissection during pregnancy is rare in clinics. Because the symptoms are lack of specificity, early diagnosis is difficult. However, the progression of aortic dissection is fast, therefore, the mortality of pregnant women and fetuses is high, and half of the death in pregnant women is due to aortic dissection. Although the development of medical condition is rapid, aortic dissection of pregnancy is still a great challenge for patients and clinicians, and is one of the most important diseases in obstetric medical disputes. In this paper, combined with the literatures published in recent years, we summarized the epidemiological characteristics and related treatment suggestions of the aortic dissection in pregnancy.