Objective To summarize the current research progress of endoscopic/robotic surgery for breast cancer, so as to provide theoretical basis for surgeons and patients to choose surgical methods. Method The relevant literatures on breast cancer endoscopic/robotic surgery at home and abroad in recent years were summarized and reviewed. Results Endoscopic/robotic surgery for breast cancer had the advantages of low intraoperative bleeding, fewer postoperative complications, fast postoperative recovery, good cosmetic results and high patient satisfaction. Conclusions Endoscopic/robotic surgery is a safe and feasible surgical modality and a complement to traditional open breast surgery.
Objective To investigate effect of optimizing operation procedure (OOP) on surgical outcomes of complete endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy (CESM) in treatment of gynecomastia. Methods A total of 217 patients with gynecomastia underwent CESM from January 2014 to March 2017 in the Third People’s Hospital of Chengdu were collected according to the criteria for inclusion and exclusion, further, based on a propensity score-matching model, a total of 94 patients were evenly assigned to OOP group (April 2015 later) and non-OOP group (before April 2015). The CESM with or without OOP was performed in the OOP group or the non-OOP group, respectively. The operative time, postoperative length of stay, treatment expenses, and favorable cosmetic effect were compared in these two groups. Results The differences in the general clinical data in both groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The operative time (min) was shorter (139.90±37.18versus 175.20±46.99, P=0.002), the postoperative length of stay (d) was shorter too (7.13±1.46 versus 8.47±2.71, P=0.021), and the treatment expenses (yuan) were more less (11 426.80±1 861.19 versus 12 315.75±1 306.64, P=0.036) in the OOP group as compared with the non-OOP group. Meanwhile the favorable cosmetic effect of the self-evaluation score in the OOP group was significantly higher than that in the non-OOP group (7.33±1.16 versus 5.97±1.16, P<0.05). Conclusion This study demonstrates that using optimizing standard CESM could shorten operative time, reduce treatment expenses, and improve satisfaction of patients.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical experiences and treatment effectiveness of chronic venous insufficiency with venous ulcer in lower limb. MethodsSeventy-eight patients (88 limbs) suffering lower limb chronic venous insufficiency with venous ulcer from May 2004 to April 2011 in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively. All the patients had undergone high ligation for great saphenous vein plus endovenous laser treatment plus subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery (SEPS). ResultsPostoperative complications included 3 cases of subfascial haematoma; 2 cases of pneumohypoderma; 3 cases of numbness in anterior tibial and ankle areas. All the ulcers healed between 4 to 6 weeks. Follow up period was between 6 months to 5 years. There was only one recurrence due to residual varicose from ankle area. The mean operation time was 20 min (15－30 min) in SEPS, the average blood loss was 2 ml (1－5 ml), and the mean duration of postoperative hospitalization was 5 d (2－8 d). ConclusionsSEPS is a first treatment choice for CVI with venous ulcer. It has less invasiveness, lower chances for bleeding, shorter operation time, quicker recovery, and fewer complications.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is one of the main methods for the diagnosis and treatment of biliary tract and pancreatic diseases. Compared with other digestive endoscopes, duodenoscopy has a special structure. Since the outbreaks of nosocomial infections caused by the transmission of multidrug-resistant organism through duodenoscopy in 2010, the reprocessing and design of digestive endoscopes represented by duodenoscopy have faced new challenges. This article reviews the international advances in duodenoscopy reprocessing in the past 10 years including the structural characteristics of duodenoscope, related infection outbreak cases, outbreak control measures, and the use of disposable duodenoscopy, so as to provide guidance and reference for the duodenoscopy reprocessing and related nosocomial infections prevention and control work in China.
After more than 10 years of development, transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) has played an important role in anus-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer. Existing studies have shown that taTME is not significantly different from traditional laparoscopy in the short-term and long-term efficacy of the treatment of low rectal cancer, and that taTME has potential advantages in postoperative functional recovery. With the maturity of taTME technology, transanal endoscopic approach has gradually been clinically applied to other rectal tumors, anastomotic stenosis, lateral lymph node dissection and other scenarios. Clinical practice shows that the transanal endoscopic approach can dissect pelvic tissues more accurately, greatly reduce the difficulty of surgery for complex pelvic diseases, improve the safety of surgery, and provide new ideas for clinical practice.
In recent years, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been widely used in spine surgery and achieved satisfactory results. In order to standardize the ERAS implementation process and application in percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar decompression/discectomy (PEID), we reviewed the literatures and cited evidence-based medicine data, and had a national comprehensive discussion among experts of the Group of Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery and Enhanced Recovery, Professional Committee of Orthopedic Surgery and Enhanced Recovery, Association of China Rehabilitation Technology Transformation and Promotion. Altogether, the up-to-date expert consensus have been achieved. The consensus may provide the reference for clinical treatment in aspect of the standardization of surgical operations, the reduction of surgical trauma and complications, the optimization of perioperative pain and sleep management, the prevention of venous thrombosis, and the guidance of patients’ functional training and perioperative education.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the short-term effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) in treatment of buttock pain associated with lumbar disc herniation.MethodsBetween June 2015 and May 2016, 36 patients with buttock pain associated with lumbar disc herniation were treated with PELD. Of 36 cases, 26 were male and 10 were female, aged from 18 to 76 years (mean, 35.6 years). The disease duration ranged from 3 months to 10 years (mean, 14 months). The location of the pain was buttock in 2 cases, buttock and thigh in 6 cases, buttock and the ipsilateral lower extremity in 28 cases. Thirty-four patients had single-level lumbar disc herniation, and the involved segments were L4, 5 in 15 cases and L5, S1 in 19 cases; 2 cases had lumbar disc herniation at both L4, 5 and L5, S1. The preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score of buttock pain was 6.1±1.3. VAS score was used to evaluate the degree of buttock pain at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and last follow-up postoperatively. The clinical outcome was assessed by the modified MacNab criteria at last follow-up.ResultsAll patients were successfully operated and the operation time was 27-91 minutes (mean, 51 minutes). There was no nerve root injury, dural tear, hematoma formation, or other serious complications. The hospitalization time was 3-8 days (mean, 5.3 days). All incisions healed well and no infection occurred. Patients were followed up 12-24 months (median, 16 months). MRI examination results showed that the dural sac and nerve root compression were sufficiently relieved at 3 months after operation. Patients obtained pain relief after operation. The postoperative VAS scores of buttock pain at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and last follow-up were 1.1±0.6, 0.9±0.3, 1.0±0.3, and 0.9±0.4 respectively, showing significant differences when compared with preoperative VAS scores (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in VAS score between the different time points after operation (P>0.05). At last follow-up, according to the modifed MacNab criteria, the results were excellent in 27 cases, good in 9 cases, and fair in 2 cases, and the excellent and good rate was 94.4%.ConclusionPELD can achieve satisfactory short-term results in the treatment of buttock pain associated with lumbar disc herniation and it is a safe and effective minimally invasive surgical technique.
Objective To evaluate the feasibility and safety of percutaneous endoscopic technique in the treatment of intraspinal cement leakage after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP). Methods Between May 2014 and March 2016, 5 patients with lower limb pain and spinal cord injury caused by intraspinal cement leakage after PVP, were treated with percutaneous endoscopic spinal decompression. Of 5 cases, 3 were male and 2 were female, aged from 65 to 83 years (mean, 74.4 years). The course of disease was 10-30 days (mean, 16.2 days). Imageological examinations confirmed the levels of cement leakage at T 12, L 1 in 3 cases, and at L 1, 2 in 2 cases; bilateral sides were involved in 1 case and unilateral side in 4 cases. Two patients had lower limb pain, whose visual analogue scale (VAS) were 8 and 7; 3 patients had lower extremities weakness, whose Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) 29 scores were 18, 20, and 19. According to American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale, neural function was rated as grade E in 2 cases and grade D in 3 cases. Results The operation time was 55-119 minutes (mean, 85.6 minutes), and the blood loss was 30-80 mL (mean, 48 mL). CT scan and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction at 1 day after operation showed that cement leakage was removed in all patients. Five cases were followed up 6-21 months (mean, 12 months). In 2 patients with lower limb pain, and VAS score was significantly decreased to 2 at last follow-up. In 3 patients with lower extremities weakness, the muscle strength was improved progressively, and the JOA29 scores at last follow-up were 21, 23, and 22. Conclusion Percutaneous endoscopic technique for intraspinal cement leakage after PVP is safe, effective, and feasible.
ObjectiveTo explain the advantage of laparoscopic endoscopic rendezvous procedures used to treat rectal carcinoma, and predict the future direction of the surgery methods for rectal carcinoma. MethodsA review and summary based on the clinical experience of our hospital and the published researches about the laparoscopic endoscopic rendezvous procedures over the past years in home and abroad were performed. ResultsLaparoscopy can monitor the situation of the abdominal cavity.Endoscopy can detect the location of rectal carcinoma.Laparoscopic endoscopic rendezvous procedures used to treat rectal carcinoma can combine the advantage of each other.And the purpose of "less invasion, less pain, and faster recovery" will be achieved.The effect of "1+1 > 2" will be realized. ConclusionLaparoscopy and transanal endoscopic microsurgery hybrid could be a naive form of nature orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery to treat rectal carcinoma.
How to effectively repair esophageal fistulas, caused by esophageal perforation, rupture and anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy has always been a key problem for the digestive surgeon. Although there are many clinical treatment methods, the therapeutic effect is still completely unsatisfactory, especially when severe mediastinal purulent cavity infection is associated with the esophageal fistula. In recent years, foreign centers have promoted a new minimally invasive endoscopic treatment technology to repair the esophageal fistula, endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure therapy, with significantly curative effect. In this article, we will review the specific operation, advantages and disadvantages, as well as the clinical efficacy of endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure therapy in treating the esophageal fistulas, to provide a new therapeutic technique for esophageal fistulas and expand the new field of minimally invasive endoscopic therapy.