ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of long and short proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in the treatment of type A2.3 intertrochanteric fracture of femur (IFF). Methods The clinical data of 54 patients with type A2.3 IFF admitted between January 2020 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the length of PFNA nail used in the operation, they were divided into long nail group (PFNA nail length>240 mm, 24 cases) and short nail group (PFNA nail length≤240 mm, 30 cases). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, fracture side, body mass index, and time from fracture to operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, intraoperative reduction quality score, fracture healing, and complications of the two groups were recorded and compared. Harris score was used to evaluate the hip function of patients at 1 year after operation. According to the relationship between the fracture line of type A2.3 IFF and the lesser trochanter, the two groups of patients were divided into type Ⅰ(the fracture line extends to the level of the lesser trochanter), type Ⅱ(the fracture line extends to less than 2 cm below the lesser trochanter), and type Ⅲ (the fracture line extends to more than 2 cm below the lesser trochanter), and the postoperative stability and internal fixator loosening of each subtype were evaluated. Results The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency in short nail group were significantly less than those in long nail group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the intraoperative reduction quality score between the two groups (P>0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 12-18 months, with an average of 13.5 months. The postoperative stability score of short nail group was significantly lower than that of long nail group (P<0.05). The Harris score in the long nail group was significantly higher than that in the short nail group at 1 year after operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in Harris score grading between the two groups (P>0.05). Complications occurred in 3 cases of the long nail group (including 1 case of coxa varus caused by external nail entry point and 2 cases of loose internal fixator), and 7 cases of the short nail group (including 1 case of coxa varus caused by external nail entry point and 6 cases of loose internal fixator). Neither group had any anterior femoral arch damage, there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The number of type Ⅲ patients was relatively small and not included in the statistics; there was no significant difference in the postoperative stability score and the incidence of internal fixator loosening between the long and short nail groups in type Ⅰ patients (P>0.05). In type Ⅱ patients, the postoperative stability score and the incidence of internal fixation loosening in the long nail group were significantly better than those in the short nail group (P<0.05).Conclusion Long PFNA fixation for type A2.3 IFF has longer operation time and more intraoperative blood loss, but the overall stability of fracture is better after operation. For type A2.3 IFF with fracture line extending to less than 2 cm below the lesser trochanter, long PFNA is used for fixation, although the surgical trauma is large, but the postoperative stability is better than that of short PFNA; for type A2.3 IFF with fracture line extending to the lesser trochanter, there is no significant difference in postoperative stability between long and short PFNAs.
Objective To summarize the selection criteria and clinical application of surgical methods for hip fractures (femoral neck fracture and intertrochanteric fracture) in the elderly. Methods The related literature concerning the surgical methods for femoral neck fracture and intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly at home and abroad was extensively reviewed and summarized. Results Among the elderly patients with femoral neck fracture, the closed reduction and internal fixation or dynamic hip screw (DHS), and total hip arthroplasty are recommended for patients under 65 years old and 65–80 years old respectively and without special surgical contraindication; whereas hemiarthroplasty is recommended for patients with poor physical conditions. Among the patients with intertrochanteric fracture, DHS or the 3rd generation of Gamma nails is recommended for patients with stable fracture while the intramedullary fixation systems (e.g., proximal femoral nail anti-rotation, intertrochanteric antegrade nail) and the extramedullary fixation systems (e.g., proximal femoral locking compression plate and less invasive stabilization system) can be applied to the patients with unstable fracture according to the fracture type and bone conditions. Notably, hip arthroplasty is recommended for elderly patients with comminuted fracture. Conclusion The surgical method and internal fixator should be chosen according to the fracture type and bone condition in the elderly in order to improve the effectiveness and reduce the complication.
Objective To investigate the effect of treatment with proximal femoral nail (PFN) on femur intertrochanteric fractures in the old. Methods A retrospective study of 62 patients with femur intertrochantericfractures treated with PFN from October 2001 to September 2003 was carried out.The data of operative time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, wound drainage, postoperative complications, healing time, and hip function were recordedand compared with previous literature so as to evaluate the effect. Results All patients were followed up for 8-22 month(13.6 months on average). Intraoperative fracture occurred again in 2 cases. Two patients died of brain embolism and pulmonary infection respectively. Heterogeneous ossification occurred in 2 cases. Hip varus occurred in 1 case. Extra hip anteversion occurred in 1 case. The effect of other cases was satisfactory. The operative time was 76.5±29.1 min, the mean blood loss was 385.7±98.4 ml, the wound drainage was 45.5±21.7 ml, and the healing time was 13.2±3.8 weeks. According to the Sanders post-trauma hip function assessing system, the excellent and good rate was 89.6%. Conclusion The application of PFN is characterized by short operative time, less blood loss, stable fixation, so it is an effective way to treat femur intertrochanteric fracture in the old.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA), locking compression plate (LCP), and artificial femoral head replacement for femoral intertrochanteric fracture in aged patients so as to provide reference for clinical treatment.MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 150 aged patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture treated between September 2009 and March 2016. PFNA was used in 51 cases (group A), LCP in 53 cases (group B), and artificial femoral head replacement in 46 cases (group C). There was no significant difference in sex, age, side, cause of injury, injury to operation time, type of fracture, and combined medical diseases between groups (P>0.05). The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, time for full weight bearing, hip Harris score, and complications were recorded and compared between groups.ResultsThe patients were followed up 12-23 months (mean, 18.6 months) in group A, 12-25 months (mean, 19.0 months) in group B, and 12-24 months (mean, 18.9 months) in group C. The incision length, operation time, and intraoperative blood loss of group A were significantly less than those of groups B and C (P<0.05); the operation time of group C was significantly shorter than that of group B (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in incision length and intraoperative blood loss (P>0.05). The time for full weight bearing was significantly shorter in group C than groups A and B, and in group A than group B (P<0.05). Postoperative complications occurred in 11 patients of group A (21.6%), 14 patients of group B (26.4%), and 2 patients of group C (4.3%), showing significant difference between group C and group A or group B (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between groups A and B (P>0.05). Hip Harris score at 12 months after operation had no significant difference between groups (P>0.05).ConclusionPFNA, LCP, and artificial femoral head replacement are all effective methods to treat femoral intertrochanteric fracture in aged patients. PFNA has the advantages of small incision, short operation time, less bleeding and simple procedure, and artificial femoral head replacement has the advantages of early time for full weight bearing, less bed rest time, and less complications. For these patients, PFNA and artificial femoral head replacement are appropriate.
ObjectiveTo compare the biomechanical properties between the proximal femoral locking plate and Gamma3 for fixing stable intertrochanteric fracture so as to provide a theoretical basis for selecting internal fixation in the clinical application. MethodsFive pairs of antiseptic femur specimens were selected. Specimens of each pair of matching were randomly divided into groups A and B (n=5). All specimens were made the intertrochanteric fracture of 31A1.1 type according to AO/Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO/ASIF) classification. Fracture was fixed with Gamma3 in group A and with proximal femoral locking plate in group B. The axial compression, destruction, and torsion tests were carried out on the mechanical testing machine. ResultsAxial compression test:The load-displacement curve of groups A and B was basically a straight line; axial stiffness of groups A and B was (621.00±36.48) N/mm and (542.55±46.94) N/mm respectively, showing significant difference (t=3.648, P=0.036). Destruction test:The maximum yield load of groups A and B was (4 394.82±450.37) N and (2 987.54±112.14) N respectively, showing significant difference (t=5.433, P=0.032). After loading maximum yield load, femoral fracture occurred again, and internal fixation and bone interface loosening were observed in group A; bending and breaking of proximal locking screw for internal fixation were found in group B, but loosening of internal fixation and bone interface was more obvious in group A than in group B. Torsion test:The torque of specimens in 2 groups increased with the increase of torsion angle (P < 0.05), the torque corresponding to the torsion angle in group B was larger than that in group A, but the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). The torsional stiffness of groups A and B was (1.78±0.16) N·mm/deg and (2.01±0.08) N·mm/deg respectively, showing no significant difference (t=-3.833, P=0.162). ConclusionProximal femoral locking plate and Gamma3 in the treatment of stable intertrochanteric fracture have good biomechanical properties, which can meet the requirements of minimal invasion, strong internal fixation, and early activity.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of InterTan in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Methods Between April 2009 and July 2009, 57 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture were treated with InterTan. There were 33 males and 24 females with an average age of 68 years (range, 45-88 years). The locations were left side in 31 cases and right side in 26 cases and all fractures were closed fractures. According to Association for Osteosynthesis/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, there were 23 cases of type 31-A1, 27 of type 31-A2, and 7 of type 31-A3. The disease duration was 2 to 8 days with an average of 3.3 days. The data of operative time, blood loss, perioperative blood transfusion, hospital ization day, fracture heal ing time, and Harris hip score were recorded. Results The operative time and the blood loss were (74.5 ± 19.7) minutes and (148.8 ± 79.6) mL, respectively. There were significant differences in the operative time and the blood loss among the AO/OTA subgroups (P lt; 0.05). Twenty-five patients required a blood transfusion and the transfusion volume was (264.0 ± 90.7) mL. The average hospital ization days were 7 days (range, 6-9 days). Thirty-five patients were followed up 12 to 15 months (13.3 months on average). X-ray films showed that all fractures healed within (2.8 ± 0.8) months. The heal ing time of fracture was (2.4 ± 0.6), (2.9 ± 0.9), and (3.8 ± 0.5) months in 31-A1 subgroup, 31-A2 subgroup, and 31-A3 subgroup, respectively. There was no significant difference in heal ing time of fracture between 31-A1 subgroup and 31-A2 subgroup (P gt; 0.05), and there were significant differences between 31-A3 group and 31-A1 subgroup, 31-A2 subgroup (P lt; 0.05). No shortening, cut-out, varus malposition, femoral shaft fracture, or implant failures was found. The Harris score at the final follow-up was 84.5 ± 8.2 with an excellent and good rate of 80% (15 cases of excellent, 13 of good, 6 of fair, and 1 of poor). Twenty patients (57%) recovered the walking abil ity. Conclusion The new intertrochanteric antegrade nail of InterTan can be used to treat femoral intertrochanteric fractures with good cl inical outcomes, high union rate, and less compl ications.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous combined with topical administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) in reducing blood loss after intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fractures by a prospective controlled trial.MethodsPatients with intertrochanteric femoral fractures, who were admitted for intramedullary fixation between June 2015 and July 2019, were selected as the study subjects, 120 of whom met the selection criteria. The patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups: intravenous administration group (group A, 41 cases), topical administration group (group B, 40 cases), and combined administrations group (group C, 39 cases). In group A, 4 patients occurred deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity before operation, 1 patient died of myocardial infarction on the 5th day after operation, and 1 patient developed severe pulmonary infection after operation. In group B, 2 patients occurred deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity before operation and 1 patient had iatrogenic fracture during operation. In group C, 3 patients occurred deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity before operation and 1 patient developed pulmonary infection before operation and gave up surgical treatment. All the above patients were excluded from the study, and the remaining 107 cases were included in the analysis, including 35, 37, and 35 cases in groups A, B, and C, respectively. There was no significant difference in gender, age, height, body mass, injury cause, fracture side and type, the interval between injury and operation, and preoperative hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit between groups (P>0.05). Intraoperative TXA (15 mg/kg) was injected intravenously in group A at 30 minutes before operation, and 1 g of TXA was injected into the medullary cavity in group B after the proximal femur was grooted and before the intramedullary nail implantation, respectively. TXA was given in group C before and during operation according to the administration methods and dosage of groups A and B. Total blood loss, maximum Hb decrease, blood transfusion rate, operation time, fracture healing time, and the incidence of complications were recorded and compared between groups. The hip joint function were evaluated by Harris score. ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time between groups (P>0.05). The total blood loss, the maximum Hb decrease, and the blood transfusion rate in group B were the highest, followed by group A and group C, and the differences between groups were significant (P<0.05). No incision infection or pulmonary embolism occurred in the 3 groups after operation. The incidence of anemia in group C was significantly lower than that in groups A and B, the difference was significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of subcutaneous hematoma, aseptic exudation, and deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity between groups (P>0.05). All patients in the 3 groups were followed up 8-35 months, with an average of 16.2 months. The fracture healing time of groups A, B, and C was (6.12±1.78), (5.89±1.63), and (5.94±1.69) months, respectively, and there was no significant difference between groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, the Harris scores of the hip joints in groups A, B, and C were 83.18±7.76, 84.23±8.01, and 85.43±8.34, and the difference was not significant (P>0.05). ConclusionPreoperative intravenous injection combined with intraoperative topical application of TXA can effectively reduce blood loss and blood transfusion after intramedullary fixation of femoral intertrochanteric fracture, without increasing the risk of deep vein thrombosis, and the efficacy is better than that of intravenous injection or topical administration.
Objective To investigate the perioperative changes in serum interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels in elderly male patients with intertrochanteric fractures, and provide evidence for inflammatory control in this patient population. Methods The clinical data of 40 male patients aged more than 60 years with intertrochanteric fractures who met the selection criteria between January 2021 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, including 25 non-osteoporosis patients (T value>−2.5, group A) and 15 osteoporosis patients (T value≤−2.5, group B). In addition, 40 healthy men aged more than 60 years old were included as controls (group C) according to the age matching rule. There was no significant difference in age, smoking history, drinking history, body mass index, complications (hypertension and diabetes), alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and total protein among the 3 groups (P>0.05). Serum samples were collected from group C subjects and from groups A and B patients preoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 3, 5, and 7. IL-6 levels were measured using ELISA assay. Pearson correlation analysis was used to assess the relationship between IL-6 levels and T values at various time points in groups A and B. Postoperative complications during hospitalization and 1-year mortality rates were recorded for groups A and B. Results Preoperative IL-6 levels were significantly higher in groups A and B than in group C (P<0.05), with group B being significantly higher than group A (P<0.05). In groups A and B, IL-6 levels increased significantly on postoperative day 1 compared to preoperative levels and then gradually decreased, approaching preoperative levels by postoperative day 7. IL-6 levels in group B were significantly higher than those in group A at all postoperative time points (P<0.05). Correlation analysis showed that IL-6 levels were negatively correlated with T values at all perioperative time points in all patients from groups A and B (P<0.05). Complications occurred in 4 patients (16.0%) in group A, including 2 cases of pulmonary infection, 1 case of urinary tract infection, and 1 case of heart failure, and in 3 patients (20.0%) in group B, including 2 cases of pulmonary infection and 1 case of gastrointestinal bleeding. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (χ2=0.104, P=0.747). There were 2 cases (8.0%) and 4 cases (26.7%) died within 1 year after operation in groups A and B, respectively, and there was no significant difference in 1-year mortality rates between the two groups (χ2=2.562, P=0.109). Conclusion Serum IL-6 levels significantly increase in the early postoperative period in elderly male patients with intertrochanteric fractures, especially in those with osteoporosis. Monitoring the inflammatory state and promptly controlling the inflammatory response during the perioperative period, may reduce complications and improve postoperative survival in this patient population.
摘要:目的:探讨老年人股骨粗隆间骨折不同手术方式的选择。方法:我院2004年1月至2007年12月间应用不同术式治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折110例,其中动力髋螺钉(DHS)25例, 股骨近端髓内钉(PFN)41例,人工股骨头置换44例。术后所有患者均获随访,平均12.6个月。对术后并发症和按照Kuderna 改良 Merli D’Aubigne标准得到的髋关节功能恢复优良数(率)进行评价。结果:术后出现并发症3例,其中PFN术式2例;人工股骨头置换术式1例。围手术期内无伤口感染,无死亡病例。三种术式总体优良数(率)为:107(97.3%)。结论:三种手术方式各有其优缺点,没有一种术式能普遍适用于各种类型粗隆间骨折,临床上,为了最大限度降低手术风险,我们没有必要专注或偏好于某一种手术方式,要根据患者的个体差异及每种术式的优缺点,灵活地为每例股骨粗隆间骨折患者制定出其最适宜的手术方式,大都能取得满意的疗效。Abstract: Objective: To investigate the chosen of 3 different surgical methods in the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly. Methods:From January, 2004 to December, 2007, 110 cases with the femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly were treated with the followed 3 kinds of operations respectively:dynamic hip screw (25 cases), proximal femoral nail (41 cases), hip hemiarthroplasty (44 cases). After surgery all patients were followed up; Followedup period range from 6 months to 18 months(average 12.6 months). The good and excellent number (rate) of 3 surgical methods with Merli D’Aubigne evaluation criteria were evaluated, and compared in the postoperative complications. Results: 3 complications occurred postoperatively ( 2 with PFN,1 with hip hemiarthroplasty), none wound infection or died in Perioperatie. The total good successful number (rate) was 107(97.3%). Conclusion:Each has its advantages and its disadvantages. None of three kinds of surgical methods can be used generally all kinds of the femoral intertrochanter fracture. In clinical work, we don not need to focus on or prefer to the only one of them in order to minimize the risk. The good response to treatment will be get if we can choose the appropriate method according to the individual differences of the advantages and disadvantages of each method.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress on the evaluation methods of head-neck nail positions in femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Methods The literature about the evaluation methods of head-neck nail positions for femoral intertrochanteric fractures in recent years was extensively reviewed, and research progress in the aspects of evaluation methods, clinical applications, and limitations were summarized. ResultsThe position of head-neck nails in femoral intertrochanteric fractures is closely related to postoperative complications of head-neck nail cutting. Currently, the tip-apex distance (TAD) and femoral head zoning are widely used to evaluate the position of head-neck nails. The main opinion in the literature is that the use of TAD and femoral head zoning can effectively reduce the incidence of head-neck nails cutting. Parker’s ratio, as one of the evaluation methods, has been controversial in subsequent studies and has not been widely used in clinical practice. The TAD as referenced to the calcar (CalTAD), which was modified based on TAD, has been gradually accepted by the clinic, but whether it is better than the TAD has not yet been conclusively determined. In recent years, new evaluation methods have been proposed to supplement the previous evaluation methods, such as the tip-neck distance ratio (TNDR) and the standardized TAD (STAD) to avoid the limitations of the TAD and the CalTAD by the volume of the femoral head, and the axis-blade angle (ABA) to supplement the direction of the head-neck nails channel, but at present the clinical application is relatively underutilized, and the validity of the method needs to be further verified. ConclusionCurrently, there are many methods for evaluating the position of head-neck nails in femoral intertrochanteric fractures, TAD<25 mm combined with head-neck nails placed in the middle-middle quadrant or lower-middle quadrant of the femoral head division is currently a highly recognized assessment in the literature, but the optimal assessment is still controversial, and further research needs to be studied.