Objective To summarize the preoperative CT three-dimensional reconstruction, and administration and visualization of indocyanine green (ICG) during ICG-assisted laparoscopic duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (LDPPHR). Methods A 56-year-old female patient admitted to the Department of Biliary Surgery in West China Hospital in April 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. The patient was considered the possibility of benign tumor of pancreatic head, and underwent LDPPHR. Three-dimensional CT reconstruction was performed before operation, and ICG (5 mg) was injected intravenously preoperative and intraoperative to complete LDPPHR. Results Preoperative three-dimensional CT reconstruction can assist in judging the course and relationship of anterior and posterior pancreaticoduodenal arterial arch and surrounding main blood vessels. After intravenous injection of 5 mg ICG 24 hours before operation, the common bile duct at the upper edge of pancreas was clearly visualized, and the cystic mass was judged not to communicate with bile duct and pancreatic duct. But it was difficult to identify the pancreatic segment of the common bile duct in fluorescence mode, ICG 5 mg was injected intravenously during the resection stage, and then the common bile duct was obviously visualized. After the resection stage, injected ICG (5 mg) intravenously again. Within 1 min, the fluorescence of the duodenum was enhanced, which suggested that the blood perfusion of duodenum was well. The operative time was 280 min, the blood loss was about 200 mL. On the 10th day after operation, the patient developed transient gastrointestinal bleeding with bile leakage, which improved after symptomatic treatment and was discharged on the 19th day. Postoperative pathological examination diagnosed pancreatic serous cystadenoma. Conclusions Three-dimensional reconstruction and ICG assisted LPDDHR can successfully visualize and identify the blood vessels and bile ducts, and check the duodenal blood perfusion. Which can making the operation more accurate and visual is a powerful guarantee for LDPPHR to be carried out safely and effectively.
The “Expert consensus on radical laparoscopic cholecystectomy (2023)” (following abbreviations as “this consensus”) was formulated by the Biliary Surgery Group of the Chinese Medical Association Surgery Branch and the Biliary Surgery Expert Working Group of the Surgeons Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association, and was first published in the Chinese Journal of Surgery in April 2024. In this consensus, relevant experts discussed and formulated relevant recommendations on the operation process of laparoscopicradical resection of gallbladder cancer (LRRGC), and elaborated on many issues. We interpreted and discussed the safety and efficacy evaluation of LRRGC, the standardized operating procedures and technical key points in this procedure, as well as the surgical principles for reoperation of delayed diagnosed gallbladder cancer in this consensus so as to enhance readers’ understanding of this consensus. We also hoped that medical centers will make more attempts and research on LRRGC in order to standardize and promote the application of LRRGC.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical efficacy and summarize the experience of intracapsular approach used in laparoscopic duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection (LDPPHRt). MethodThe clinical data of patients (from April 2020 to June 2024), including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative details who underwent LDPPHRt in Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology were collected and analyzed. ResultsSeventy-five patients were collected in this study, including 35 males (46.7%) and 40 females (53.3%). The age was (38.3±7.9) years old, and 35 patients (46.7%) presented without symptoms. The main symptoms were abdominal pain (21 cases, 28.0%), repeated diarrhea (15 cases, 20.0%), weight loss (4 cases, 5.3%). The diameter of the pancreatic head lesions was (3.2±0.8) cm. The operative time was (210.6±23.8) min, and the blood loss was (62.4±38.1) mL. There were 18 cases (24.0%) of postoperative complications, including 6 cases (8.0%) of postoperative pancreatic fistula, 5 cases (6.7%) of haemorrhage, 4 cases (5.3%) of biliary leakage, 2 cases (2.7%) of lymphatic leakage, 4 cases (5.3%) of delayed gastric emptying, 2 cases (2.7%) of abdominal infection, 1 case (1.3%) of pulmonary infection and 2 cases (2.7%) of wound infection. The length of postoperative hospital stay was (11.7±3.3) d, and no one died within 90 d after surgery. ConclusionsThe intracapsular approach is a feasible and safe surgical procedure in LDPPHRt for patients with benign, borderline or low grade malignant tumors.
Objective To investigate the feasibility of elective laparoscopic hepatectomy in the treatment of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods We tried to perform an elective laparoscopic hepatectomy for a middle-aged man who had a ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma without active hemorrhage. The data of this patient was summarized. Results The patient received the elective laparoscopic hepatectomy, and the liver lesions were completely removed. The operation was successful. Operative time was 300 min and intraoperative bleeding was 500 mL. Postoperative recovery of this patient was good and no complication occurred. The abdominal drainage tube was removed on 4 days after operation, and he discharged on 8 days after operation. The pathology confirmed that the hepatocellular carcinoma was moderately differentiated and ruptured. Conclusion Elective laparoscopic hepatectomy is safe and feasible in the treatment of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma for specific patient, but this operation needs to be performed by experienced surgeons with laparoscopic skills.
The large force applied by laparoscopic grasper during clamping operation can cause tissue damage and induce various complications. In this research, the security of graspers with different radii of curvature and teeth were evaluated by using experimental investigation, finite element simulation and tissue damage assessment method based on in vivo compression tests with rabbit large intestines models. Results showed that the most serious tissue damages appeared in areas that were in contact with the jaw edges, which were the regions of stress concentration. The increase in radii of curvature of the edges or teeth could alleviate the tissue damages. The results could provide basic data for choosing and designing noninvasive graspers.
Objective To evaluate safety, efficacy, and indications of laparoscopic bile duct reexploration in treatment of bile duct stones. Methods Fifty-seven patients with bile duct stones who underwent laparoscopic common bile duct reexploration (laparoscope group) and 62 patients with bile duct stones who underwent open common bile duct reexploration (laparotomy group) were included into this study from February 2013 to February 2017 in the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. The intraoperative and postoperative data of the patients were documented and analyzed. Results All the operations were performed successfully and all the patients had no extra-damage during the operation. One case was converted to the laparotomy due to the intraabdominal serious adhesion in the laparoscope group. Compared with the laparotomy group, the amount of intraoperative blood loss was less, the first time of anal exhaust was earlier, the rates of postoperative analgesia and incision infection were lower, and the length of hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscope group, there were significant differences (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the operative time, the hospitalization expense, primary suture rate of common bile duct, and the rates of postoperative complications such as the bile leakage, bile duct stricture, and residual stone between the laparoscope group and the laparotomy group (P>0.05). Conclusion With experienced skills and strict surgical indications, laparoscopic common bile duct reexploration is safe and effective in treatment of bile duct stones, and it has some advantages including less bleeding, rapid recovery, and shorter hospitalization time.
Objective To explore the risk factors of chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) after transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP), establish and verify the risk prediction model, and then evaluate the prediction effectiveness of the model. Methods The clinical data of 362 patients who received TAPP surgery was retrospectively analyzed and divided into model group (n=300) and validation group (n=62). The risk factors of CPIP in the model group were screened by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis, and the risk prediction model was established and tested. Results The incidence of CPIP at 6 months after operation was 27.9% (101/362). Univariate analysis showed that gender (χ2= 12.055, P=0.001), age (t=–4.566, P<0.01), preoperative pain (χ2=44.686, P<0.01) and early pain at 1 week after operation (χ2=150.795, P<0.01) were related to CPIP. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender, age, preoperative pain, early pain at 1 week after operation, and history of lower abdominal surgery were independent risk predictors of CPIP. The area under curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) of the risk prediction model was calculated to be 0.933 [95%CI (0.898, 0.967)], and the optimal cut-off value was 0.129, while corresponding specificity and sensitivity were 87.6% and 91.5% respectively. The prediction accuracy, specificity and sensitivity of the model were 91.9% (57/62), 90.7% and 94.7%, respectively when the validation group data were substituted into the prediction model. Conclusion Female, age≤64 years old, preoperative pain, early pain at 1 week after operation and without history of lower abdominal surgery are independent risk factors for the incidence of CPIP after TAPP, and the risk prediction model established on this basis has good predictive efficacy, which can further guide the clinical practice.
Objective To investigate safety, feasibility, and future direction of laparoscopic splenectomy. Method The latest progress and new achievements of laparoscopic splenectomy in the world were analyzed and summarized. Results At present, the laparoscopic splenectomy mainly included the completely laparoscopic splenectomy, hand assisted laparoscopic splenectomy, gasless laparoscopic splenectomy, single hole laparoscopic splenectomy, or robot assisted laparoscopic splenectomy. The completely laparoscopic total splenectomy had become the most common surgical procedure in the clinical treatment due to the reliable curative effect, less injury, and rapid recovery, the partial splenectomy was one of the precise treatments for the benign splenic lesions. The hand assisted laparoscopic splenectomy was widely used in the giant spleen, it could reduce the exposure difficulty, effectively deal with the intraoperative hemorrhage, and reduce the risk of surgery. The robot assisted laparoscopic splenectomy was one of the minimally invasive operations, the system with three-dimensional high definition vision and flexible robotic arm overcame the limitations of traditional laparoscopic two-dimensional display, could precisely complete the operation and achieve the accurate treatment. Conclusions Laparoscopic splenectomy has some advantages of less operative injury, less pain, and rapid recovery, it’s safety and feasibility have been proved. We should strictly grasp indications and contraindications for laparoscopic splenectomy, appropriate surgical methods should be selected for specific splenic diseases to achieve the best curative effect. Remote control and precision operation will be a direction of development in future.
ObjectiveTo summarize the current common clinical laparoscopic gastrointestinal tumor surgical localization methods, and to provide reference for clinicians to choose reasonable localization methods. MethodThe domestic and foreign literatures related to laparoscopic gastrointestinal tumor surgical localization methods were searched and reviewed. ResultsThe common localization methods for laparoscopic gastrointestinal tumor surgery were imaging localization, preoperative endoscopic localization, intraoperative endoscopic localization and intraoperative fluorescence localization, among which abdominal enhanced CT and endoscopic-related localization methods were the most commonly used localization methods in clinical practice at present. ConclusionA variety of methods are available for surgeons to choose from, and the precise localization of tumors is better facilitated by combining multiple methods.