ObjectiveTo systematically review the prognostic value of E-cadherin expression in stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MethodsDatabases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2015), CNKI, CBM and WanFang Data were searched to collect cohort studies about the prognostic value of E-cadherin expression in stage I NSCLC from inception to Jun. 2015. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 9 cohort studies, involving 1028 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, the lower E-cadherin expression group had a lower overall survival rate than that of the higher E-cadherin expression group (HR=1.74, 95%CI 1.36 to 2.24, P＜0.00001). However, there was no significant difference between two groups in disease free survival (HR=2.08, 95%CI 0.8 to 5.40, P=0.13). Subgroup analysis showed that, the lower E-cadherin expression group had a worse overall survival when groups were divided by different cut-off values, E-cadherin location site or different nations (all value P＜0.05). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that, reduced E-cadherin expression could predict poor prognostic outcome in patients with stage I NSCLC. Due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, the above conclusions need to be verified by more high quality studies.
Surgery remains as the primary definitive therapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) currently. However, quite a few NSCLC patients, especially in the later stage, suffered tumor recurrence after resection. Safer and more effective perioperative treatment is urgently needed to reduce the recurrence risk after NSCLC surgery. Immune checkpoint inhibitors can effectively prevent tumor immune evasion and have been shown to be a feasible, safe and effective neoadjuvant therapy for resectable NSCLC. Nevertheless, certain crucial problems, including the final effect on NSCLC recurrence, the selection of beneficial group and optimal treatment protocol are yet unsolved. Fortunately, several phase Ⅲ randomized controlled trials are ongoing to answer these questions and will hopefully provide stronger evidence.
Objective To investigate the expression and clinical value of long chain non-coding RNA nicotinamide nucleotide hydrogenase antisense RNA1 (LncRNA NNT-AS1), motor neuron and pancreas homeobox protein 1 antisense RNA1 (MNX1-AS1) in lung cancer patients. Methods This study selected 128 patients diagnosed with lung cancer admitted to The Third Medical Center of the General Hospital of the People’s Liberation Army from April 2020 to April 2021 as a cancer group. During the same period, 128 patients with benign pulmonary nodules were regarded as a benign group, and 128 healthy individuals who underwent physical examination were selected as a control group. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was applied to detect the levels of LncRNA NNT-AS1 and MNX1-AS1 in serum. A three-year follow-up was conducted on all lung cancer patients, with 52 patients in the death group and 76 patients in the survival group. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was applied to analyze the diagnostic value of serum LncRNA NNT-AS1 and MNX1-AS1 for the occurrence of lung cancer and their predictive value for prognosis. Results Compared with the control group, the serum levels of LncRNA NNT-AS1 and MNX1-AS1 were obviously increased in the benign group and the cancer group (P<0.05). Compared with the benign group, the levels of LncRNA NNT-AS1 and MNX1-AS1 in serum of the cancer patients were obviously increased (P<0.05). The area under ROC curve (AUC) of serum LncRNA NNT-AS1 combined with MNX1-AS1 for the diagnosis of lung cancer was higher than that of LncRNA NNT-AS1 and MNX1-AS1 alone (ZLncRNA NNT-AS1~LncRNA NNT-AS1+MNX1-AS1=2.496, P=0.013; ZMNX1-AS1~LncRNA NNT-AS1+MNX1-AS1=2.831, P=0.007). The levels of LncRNA NNT-AS1 and MNX1-AS1 were related to tumor differentiation, clinical stage, and lymph node metastasis (P<0.05). Compared with the survival group, the serum levels of LncRNA NNT-AS1 and MNX1-AS1 in the death group were obviously increased (P<0.05). The AUC of combined prediction for lung cancer prognosis by serum LncRNA NNT-AS1 and MNX1-AS1 was higher than that predicted by LncRNA NNT-AS1 and MNX1-AS1 alone (ZLncRNA NNT-AS1~LncRNA NNT-AS1+MNX1-AS1=2.539, P=0.011; ZMNX1-AS1~LncRNA NNT-AS1+MNX1-AS1=3.377, P=0.001). Conclusion LncRNA NNT-AS1 and MNX1-AS1 are highly expressed in serum of lung cancer patients, and both have certain value in diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of lung cancer.
Objective To evaluate the role of topotecan in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Methods Up to 2006, we searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMbase, Cancerlit, CBM, CNKI and VIP. Handsearch and additional search were also conducted. The quality of included studies was evaluated and meta-analyses were performed for the results of homogeneous studies by RevMan 4.2.8 software. Results Fourteen studies involving 2 099 participants with SCLC were included. All included studies were adequate in reporting randomization, while inadequate in allocation concealment and blinding. Meta-analyses showed that the response rate of TP (topotecan + cisplatin) regimen had no significant difference compared with EP regimen (etoposide + cisplatin) with OR 0.83 and 95%CI 0.63 to 1.09, but myelo-suppression such as leucopenia and thrombopenia was more severe with TP regimen; the response rate of monotherapy with topotecan was similar with that of CE (carboplatin + etoposide) regimen with OR 0.59 and 95%CI 0.22 to 1.60; the response rate of TEP (topotecan + etoposide + cisplatin) regimen was comparable with that of EP regimen with OR 1.37 and 95%CI 0.82 to –2.28, but myelosuppression and anemia were more severe with TEP regimen; the response rate with OR 0.97 and 95％CI 0.60 to –1.57, median time to progression with WMD –2.32 and 95％CI –5.72 to 1.09 and median survival time with WMD –1.65 and 95％CI –7.13 to 3.83 of IV topotecan were similar to those of oral topotecan, while neutropenia was more severe with IV topotecan. Forty-five treatment-related deaths were reported in all included studies. Conclusions Topotecan is an effective agent for SCLC when used as monotherapy or in combined treatment, but myelosuppression such as leucopenia and thrombopenia was relatively severe. Although it has been recommended as a second-line agent for recurrence of sensitive SCLC, more clinical trials are needed to define its role in first-line treatment. Due to a high risk of selection bias and detection bias in included studies, the evidence is insufficient to determine the effect of topotecan. Further large-scale trials are required to define the role of topotecan in the treatment of SCLC.
Objctive To explore the effect of positive lymph nodes ratio (LNR) on prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Clinical data of 432 NSCLC patients undergoing radical surgery for lung cancer and systemic lymph node dissection in our hospital from January 2010-2013 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 316 males and 116 females with age of 39-84 (57.59±9.16) years. Among 432 patients, 229 (53.0%) were classified as N0 based on pathological staging of lymph nodes, 104 (24.1%) as N1 and 99 (22.9%) as N2. Kaplan-Meier curve and COX multi-factor regression model were used to evaluate the correlation between the clinical data and patients' survival. Results Five lymph nodes on average (range, 1-52) were removed in each patient. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the higher the staging of positive lymph nodes was, the shorter the patients' overall survival and disease-free survival were (P<0.001). Survival analysis showed that the LNR was closely associated with disease-free survival and overall survival (P<0.001). COX multivariate analysis revealed that the LNR staging was an independent risk factor of prognosis of NSCLC. Conclusion LNR is an independent prognostic factor of NSCLC, and can be used to improve lymph node staging in standards for NSCLC staging in the future.
ObjectiveTo analyze the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy and bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy (BIC), bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy (BC), chemotherapy (CT), immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (IC), bevacizumab combined with immunotherapy (BI), bevacizumab (B) in the first-line treatment of advanced wild-type non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched to collect phase Ⅱ/Ⅲ randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the objectives of the study from January 2010 to December 1, 2022. After two investigators independently screened the literatures, extracted the data and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies, a reticular meta-analysis was performed using R 3.6.1 software. ResultsA total of 11 RCTs were finally included, including 5 329 patients and six treatment combinations. Meta-analysis results showed that BIC was superior to CT for progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=0.34, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.69), but BIC did not show a significant advantage over the other groups for overall survival (OS). Bayesian ranking results showed that the BIC group had the greatest probability in terms of OS, PFS, and ORR. Among all programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expressing subgroups, there was no significant difference in OS between BIC, BC, IC, CT, BI, and B. Compared with CT, IC was significantly improved in OS (HR=0.68, 95%CI 0.52 to 0.92), PFS (HR=0.58, 95%CI 0.45 to 0.75), and ORR (HR=0.47, 95%CI 0.33 to 0.66). ConclusionIn the first-line treatment of wild-type advanced non-squamous NSCLC, immunotherapy and bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy may improve the efficacy in the short term, but do not change the long-term survival time. Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy can significantly improve the survival time and prognosis of patients compared with chemotherapy alone. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To share the clinical experience of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) anatomic basal segmentectomy by single-direction method. Methods The clinical data of 352 patients who underwent VATS anatomic basal segmentectomy in West China Hospital between April 2015 and April 2021 were retrospectively reviewed, including 96 males and 256 females with a median age of 50 (range, 26-81) years. All basal segmentectomies were performed under thoracoscopy, through the interlobar fissure or inferior pulmonary ligament approach, and following the strategy of single-direction and the method of "stem-branch". ResultsAll patients underwent basal segmentectomy successfully (49 patients of uniportal procedure, 3 patients of biportal procedure and 300 patients of triportal procedure) without addition of incisions or conversion to thoracotomy and lobectomy. The median operation time was 118 (range, 45-340) min, median intraoperative blood loss was 20 (range, 5-500) mL, median drainage time was 2 (range, 1-22) d and median postoperative hospital stay was 4 (range, 2-24) d. The postoperative complications included pneumonia in 6 patients, prolonged drainage (air leakage duration＞5 d or drainage duration＞7 d) in 18 patients, cerebral infarction in 1 patient and other complications in 2 patients. All patients were treated well and discharged without main complaints. No perioperative death happened. ConclusionVATS anatomic basal segmentectomy is feasible and safe. It can be performed in a simple manner following the strategy of single-direction.
ObjectiveTo observe the effects of hydroxysafflor yellow A (HSYA) on microvessel density (MVD) of mice transplanted Lewis lung cancer and mRNA expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) so as to explore the tumor-inhibiting mechanism of HSYA. MethodsSixty tumor-bearing C57/BL mice were randomly divided into five groups, with 12 mice in each group, namely a control group, a cyclophosphamide (CTX) group (25mg/kg), a large dose HSYA group (112mg/L), a medium dose HSYA group (56mg/L), and a small dose HSYA group (28mg/L). These different drugs were administered by intraperitoneal injection. The mice were sacrificed 22 days after the treatment. Tumor tissues were sampled and examined by immunohistochemical method and quantitative real-time PCR to detect the expression of MVD and VEGF mRNA. ResultsThe MVD of the medium and small dose HSYA groups and CTX group were 30.01±3.12, 22.56±2.11 and 16.21±2.40, respectively, which were significantly lower than 41.10±2.93 of the control group and 37.66±3.04 of the large dose HSYA group (χ2=2.82, P=0.010;χ2=3.16, P=0.007;χ2=4.58, P=0.000) and (χ2=1.98, χ2=0.038;χ2=2.45, P=0.016;χ2=3.82, P=0.001). The difference in VEGF amplified fluorescence expression threshold between the HSYA groups and the control group was not significant. However, after amplification, the expression of VEGF mRNA in the small dose HSYA group was only 0.43±0.16, which was obviously lower than 0.82±0.06 in the control group (F=0.77, P=0.038). ConclusionHSYA can significantly reduce MVD in mice transplanted Lewis lung cancer and down-regulate expression of VEGF mRNA to achieve tumor-inhibiting effect.
Abstract: Objective To observe the expression of integrinlinked kinase (ILK) and matrix metalloproteinases9 (MMP9) in human nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and investigate the correlation of ILK and MMP9 expression with the prognosis of NSCLC. Methods The expression of ILK and MMP9 in 75 specimens of NSCLC resected from January 2002 to January 2004 were detected by immunohistochemistry. According to the median of integral optical density (IOD), all patients were divided into the high or low ILK expression group and the high or low MMP-9 expression group. The relativity of ILK and MMP9 was determined, and the relationship of survival time with clinical features including expression of ILK and MMP-9 was compared by Logrank test. Results Both ILK and MMP-9 were expressed in NSCLC specimens. The expression between ILK and MMP-9 was positively correlated in 75 patients of our group (r=0.79, Plt;0.05). Patients with lower expression of ILK and MMP9 had a significantly longer survival time than those with higher expression of ILK and MMP-9 in the postoperative followup (χ2=15.067,14301,Plt;0.05). The survival time was not correlated with sex,age,smoking history or pathological type(χ2=0450,0078, 1.460, 1.623，Pgt;0.05), while tumor diameter, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage, the expression of ILK and MMP-9 significantly influenced the survival time (χ2=3.963, 15.169,20.529, 15.067，14.301，Plt;0.05). Conclusion The expression of ILK and MMP9 affects the prognosis of NSCLC. MMP-9 may advance infiltration and metastasis of tumor cells through ILK pathway. In summary, the expression of ILK and MMP9 may play an important role in the evaluation of prognosis for patients with NSCLC.
Lobectomy and systematic nodules resection has been the standard surgical procedure for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, increased small-size lung cancer has been identified with the widespread implementation of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, and it is controversial whether it is proper to choose lobar resection for the pulmonary nodules. Numerous retrospective researches and randomized clinical trials, such as JCOG0201, JCOG0804/WJOG4507L, JCOG0802 and CALGB/Alliance 140503, revealed that the sublobar resection was safe and effective for NSCLC with maximum tumor diameter≤2 cm and with consolidation tumor ratio (CTR)≤0.25, and that segmentectomy was superior to lobectomy with significant differences in 5-year overall survival rate and respiratory function for patients with small-size (≤2 cm, CTR>0.5) NSCLC and should be the standard surgical procedure. It is the principle for multiple primary lung cancer that priority should be given to primary lesions with secondary lesions considered, and it is feasible to handle the multiple lung nodules based on the patients' individual characteristics.