The therapeutic effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) was determined by a number of factors. Comprehensive thorough analysis of clinical features, imaging results and treatment response can predict the potential efficacy and possible vision recovery for the patient, and also can optimize the treatment regime to make a personalized therapy plan. Precise medicine with data from genomics, proteomics and metabolomics study will provide more objective and accurate biology basis for individual precise treatment. The future research should focus on comprehensive assessment of factors affecting the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy, to achieve individualized precise diagnosis and treatment, to improve the therapeutic outcome of nAMD.
Since anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy has recently become the first-line treatment of wet age related macular degeneration in China, as well as retinopathy of prematurity, neovascular glaucoma and macular edema secondary to diabetic retinopathy or retinal vein occlusion in other countries. It is worth thinking about that how to perform anti-VEGF treatment properly to benefit more patients. We reviewed the fields of clinical researches to explore the best role of anti-VEGF treatment in prevention and treatment of retinal disease in future.
Objective To observe the visual acuity change in patients with different patterns of optical coherence tomography (OCT) of diabetic macular edema (DME) after intravitreal ranibizumab injection and/or laser photocoagulation. Methods A retrospective observational case series. Seventy patients (99 eyes) with DME were enrolled. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was evaluated using the international vision test chart, and then convert the result to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). According to the morphological characteristics of OCT, the DME was divided into 3 patterns, including diffuse macular edema (DRT), cystoid macular edema (CME) and serous neuroepithelial layer detachment. The average follow-up was (80.43±74.89) days. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the different treatments, including intravitreal ranibizumab injection group (group A, 21 patients, 25 eyes), intravitreal ranibizumab injection and laser photocoagulation group (group B, 23 patients, 26 eyes), laser photocoagulation group (group C, 26 patients, 48 eyes). The changes of absolute BCVA (ABCVA) and improved visual acuity were compared between different treatment groups and different OCT patterns. ABCVA = logMAR BCVA before treatment－logMAR BCVA after treatment. Improvement more than 0.3 of logMAR value was considered as improved visual acuity. Results There was no significant difference in ABCVA between different treatment groups (F=0.050,P＞0.05). The improved visual acuity in group A and B were great than group C (χ2=5.645, 6.301;P＜0.05). In group A, B and C, there was no significant difference in ABCVA and improved visual acuity between different OCT patterns (P＞0.05). Improved visual acuity of DRT and CME eyes were higher in group A&B (70.59% and 50.00%) than in group C (26.47% and 14.29%), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=5.075, 4.453;P＜0.05). Conclusions There is no obvious change of visual acuity in patients with different OCT patterns of DME after the same treatment by intravitreal ranibizumab injection and/or laser photocoagulation. The improved visual acuity is not consistent in same OCT patterns after different treatment.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness and complications associated with the use of ranibizumab in the treatment of ZoneⅠand ZoneⅡretinopathy of prematurity (ROP). MethodsData from patients of ROP who had received intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) injections in Peking University People's Hospital for the treatment of ROP from July 2012 to December 2013 were collected. In total, 151 eyes from 85 patients (56 male and 29 female) were analyzed. The mean birth weight was (1438.6±334.5) g (range:790-2280 g), mean gestational age was (30.1±2.0) weeks (range:25-37 weeks), mean age at the time of intervention was (37.0±6.2) gestational weeks (range:32-45 weeks), mean follow-up was (4.9±3.3) months (range:1.4-20.8 months). The main outcome measures were the regression of ROP and the complications that were associated with the IVR injections. ResultsAfter receiving IVR injections, 120 eyes (79.5%) exhibited ROP regression after single injection. Twenty-six eyes (17.2%) required additional laser treatment for ROP regression after the absence of a positive response to the IVR injections. Five eyes (3%) progressed to stage 4 ROP and required vitrectomy to reattach the retinas. Fifty of 120 eyes which were regressed after single IVR had recurrence of ROP and need additional laser or additional IVR. All of the eyes (100.0%) had attached retinas after the various treatments that they received. No notable systemic complications related to the IVR injections were observed. ConclusionsIVR injection seems to be an effective and well-tolerated method to treat ZoneⅠand ZoneⅡROP. Recurrence of ROP is common and long-term follow up may be needed.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab and (or) triamcinolone combined with laser photocoagulation for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) during one year period. MethodsThe data of 31 eyes from 31 consecutive patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO during one year follow-up visit were retrospectively analyzed. Mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) logMAR was (0.74±0.36) and mean central retinal thickness (CRT) was (484.48±164.81)μm at baseline. All patients received standardized clinical comprehensive examinations including vision, intraocular pressure and optical coherence tomography for diagnosis before treatment. All patients received intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab (0.05 ml) at first visit. The continue PRN treatment were based on the visual acuity changes and the optical coherence tomography findings. Eyes received combined triamcinolone acetonide 0.05 ml (40 mg/ml) and ranibizumab for macular edema recurrence after two injections of ranibizumab and received laser photocoagulation during 10-14 days after third injections of ranibizumab. Mean injection of ranibizumab was 3.52±2.01, 15 eyes with triamcinolone acetonide (0.84±1.21), 21 eyes with laser photocoagulation (0.97±0.95) and 12 eyes with three treatment. Compared the visual acuities and CRTs of the first and the last visits by statistical analysis. ResultsMean visual acuity improved significantly to 0.42±0.33 logMAR (t=6.611, P=0.000). Mean improvement of visual acuity was 2.90±3.07 lines. A gain of three or more logarithmic lines was evaluated in 20/31 eyes (64.52%) at the last visit. Mean CRT was (326.19±117.80)μm (t=4.514, P=0.000).Mean reduction of CRT was (333.58±134.17)μm. A decrease of 100μm of CRT was evaluated in 17/31 eyes (54.84%). No severe ocular and systematic side effect was found. ConclusionThe efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab and (or) triamcinolone combined with laser photocoagulation for macular edema secondary to BRVO were assured.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the macular visual function of patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization (MCNV) before and after intravitreal injection of conbercept.MethodsA prospective, uncontrolled and non-randomized study. From April 2017 to April 2018, 21 eyes of 21 patients diagnosed as MCNV in Shanxi Eye Hospital and treated with intravitreal injection of conbercept were included in this study. There were 9 males (9 eyes, 42.86%) and 12 females (12 eyes, 57.14%), with the mean age of 35.1±13.2 years. The mean diopter was −11.30±2.35 D and the mean axial length was 28.93±5.68 mm. All patients were treated with intravitreal injection of conbercept 0.05 ml (1+PRN). Regular follow-up was performed before and after treatment, and BCVA and MAIA micro-field examination were performed at each follow-up. BCVA, macular integrity index (MI), mean sensitivity (MS) and fixation status changes before and after treatment were comparatively analyzed. The fixation status was divided into three types: stable fixation, relatively unstable fixation, and unstable fixation. The paired-sample t-test was used to compare BCVA, MI and MS before and after treatment. The x2 test was used to compare the fixation status before and after treatment.ResultsDuring the observation period, the average number of injections was 3.5. The logMAR BCVA of the eyes before treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment were 0.87±0.32, 0.68±0.23, 0.52±0.17, and 0.61±0.57, respectively; MI were 89.38±21.34, 88.87±17.91, 70.59±30.02, and 86.76±15.09, respectively; MS were 15.32±7.19, 21.35±8.89, 23.98±11.12, 22.32±9.04 dB, respectively. Compared with before treatment, BCVA (t=15.32, 18.65, 17.38; P＜0.01) and MS (t=4.08, 3.50, 4.26; P＜0.01) were significantly increased in the eyes 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. There was no significant difference in the MI of the eyes before treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment (t=0.60, 2.42, 2.58; P＞0.05). Before treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment, the proportion of stable fixation were 28.57%, 38.10%, 38.10%, 33.33%;the proportion of relatively unstable fixation were 47.62%, 47.62%, 52.38%, 57.14% and the proportion of unstable fixation were 23.81%, 14.28%, 9.52%, 9.52%, respectively. The proportion of stable fixation and relatively unstable fixation at 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment were higher than that before treatment, but the difference was not statistically significant (x2=1.82, 1.24, 1.69; P＞0.05).ConclusionBCVA and MS are significantly increased in patients with MCNV after intravitreal injection of conbercept.
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical effect of microincision vitreoretinal surgery (VRS) assisted with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) in severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) treatment. MethodsThis is a prospective non-randomized controlled clinical study. A total of 60 patients (70 eyes) with severe PDR diagnosed were enrolled and divided into IVR group (31 patients, 35 eyes) and control group (29 patients, 35 eyes). IVR group patients received an intravitreal injection of 0.05 ml ranibizumab solution (10 mg/ml) first, and 3 or 4 days later they received 23G microincision VRS. Control group patients only received 23G microincision VRS. The follow-up time was 3 to 12 months with an average of (4.5±1.8) months. The logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, the central retinal thickness (CRT) and retinal reattachment, and the incidence of postoperative complications were comparatively analyzed. ResultsThere was no topical and systemic adverse reactions associated with the drug after injection in IVR group. The incidence of post-operative vitreous hemorrhage (VH) in IVR group and control group was 8.6% and 28.6% at 1 week after surgery, 0.0% and 17.1% at 1 month after surgery, 0.0% and 8.6% at 3 month after surgery respectively. The differences were statistically significant for 1 week (χ2=4.63, P < 0.05) and 1 month (χ2=4.56, P < 0.05), but was not statistically significant for 3 months (χ2=0.24, P > 0.05). The mean post-operative logMAR BCVA of IVR group (0.81±0.40) and control group (1.05±0.42) have all improved than their pre-operative BCVA, the difference was statistically significant (t=12.78, 4.39; P < 0.05). The mean logMAR BCVA of IVR group is higher than BCVA of control group, the difference was statistically significant (t=-2.36, P < 0.05). The average post-operative CRT in IVR group was thinner than that of control group, the difference was statistically significant (t=-2.53, P < 0.05). The incidence of a transient high intraocular pressure in IVR group (14.3%) was lower than that in control group (34.3%), the difference was statistically significant (t=4.79, P < 0.05). The incidence of retinal reattachment (t=0.35), epiretinal membrane (χ2=0.97), neovascular glaucoma (χ2=0.51) was no difference between these two groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionThe minimally invasive VRS assisted by IVR treatment for severe PDR can effectively prevent postoperative VH, reduce CRT and improve visual acuity.
ObjectiveTo analyze the influencing factors on clinical response to conbercept for diabetic macular edema (DME).MethodsA total of 51 patients (51 eyes) with DME who underwent intravitreal injection of conbercept were included in this retrospective study. The general information (age, sex, body mass index, smoking history, drinking history), blood glucose indicators (duration of diabetes, fasting blood glucose, HbA1c), blood pressure indicators (history of hypertension, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure), lipid indicators [total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), apolipoprotein A (APOA)], biochemical indicators [neutrophil concentration, hemoglobin (HB), serum creatinine (Scr)] were collected. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and macular central macular thickness (CMT) before and after treatment were comparatively analyzed. CMT reduced not less than 20% and BCVA increased by 2 lines as effective standards. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine the factors affecting the efficacy of intravitreal injection of conbercept in patients with DME.ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that diastolic blood pressure, HDL, serum neutrophil concentration, baseline CMT and baseline BCVA were associated with edema regression (P＜0.05); HbA1c was associated with vision improvement (P＜0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that there was a history of smoking (OR=0.122, 95% CI 0.017 − 0.887), low diastolic blood pressure (OR=0.850, 95%CI0.748 − 0.966), low HDL (OR=0.007, 95%CI 0.000 1 − 0.440), thin baseline CMT (OR=0.986, 95%CI0.977 − 0.995) were independent risk factors for failure outcome of edema regression (P＜0.05); long duration of diabetes (OR=1.191, 95%CI 1.011 − 1.404), high APOA (OR=1.007, 95% CI 1.000 − 1.013) were independent risk factors for failure outcome of vision improvement. Age, fasting blood glucose, systolic blood pressure, TC, HB, Scr and other indicators had no effect on the efficacy of edema regression and vision improvement after treatment (P＞0.05).ConclusionsSmoking history, long duration of diabetes, low diastolic blood pressure, low HDL level, high APOA level and thin baseline CMT are independent risk factors for the treatment of DME with intravitreal injection of conbercept.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity(ROP). MethodsA total of 57 eyes of 29 premature infants with diagnosis of high-risk pre-threshold, threshold ROP, or aggressive posterior ROP were reviewed and analyzed in the study. The lesions of 18 eyes were located in zoneⅠ, 39 eyes were located in zoneⅡ. All infants in the study received IVR (10 mg/ml, 0.025 ml) as the initial treatment within 24 hours after diagnosis. Follow-up examinations were performed after treatment, every week at the first month, every 2 weeks at the second and third month, every month afterward, until vascularization of zoneⅢwas observed. Follow-up ranged from 16 weeks to 52 weeks, and the average follow-up time was (28.1±11.7) weeks. If the infants didn't respond positively to the treatment or the disease recurred, the additional treatments were applied. 36 eyes (63.2%) received a single injection, whereas 21 eyes (36.8%) received additional treatments. The follow-up examinations included the development of retinal vessels, the ocular or systemic adverse events. ResultsAmong the eyes, the development of peripheral retinal vessels could be observed in 36 eyes (63.2%) which received a single injection; clinical improvement in 11 eye (19.3%) which received repeat injection; stable disease in 10 eyes (17.5%) which received laser therapy. Among the eyes, 18 eyes (31.6%) recurred, including ggressive posterior ROP (14 eyes), threshold ROP (2 eyes) and high-risk pre-threshold ROP (2 eyes). The mean time of recurrence was (5.7±2.1) weeks (range 2.0-8.0 weeks). Three eyes (5.3%) of high-risk pre-threshold, threshold ROP lacked a positive response to the treatment. The lesions were controlled after additional laser given in these eyes. No serious ocular or systemic adverse events associated with the drug or the injection was observed during the follow-up period. ConclusionIVR is safe and effective for most ROP infants. In cases of recurrence or no response, conventional laser treatment or an additional IVR injection were needed.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of intravitreous injection of conbercept for macular edema secondary to retina1vein occlusion(RVO) during 6 months period. MethodsA retrospective clinical study. 34 patients (34 eyes) were included in this study,who were diagnosed with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion by ophthalmologic examination, fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus fluorescein angiography and other methods. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was examined using the international standard visual acuity chart, and the results were converted to the logMAR visual acuity. The average logMAR BCVA was 0.90±0.68, and the mean macular central retinal thickness (CMT) was (672.27±227.51) μm before treatment. All subjects received intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg conbercept (0.05 ml) at the first visit. Injections were repeated based on the visual acuity changes and the OCT findings. 34 eyes received 69 times of injection, the average number of injections was 2.03±1.03. BCVA, OCT were examined before and after treatment using the same method. BCVA and CMT changes, drugs and treatments associated cardiac and cerebral vascular accident, intraocular pressure elevation, retinal tears, retinal detachment, endophthalmitis and other complications after treatment were observed. Linear correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between prognosis BCVA and baseline BCVA, correlation between prognosis BCVA and baseline CMT, and also correlation between BCVA and CMT at different time points before and after treatment. ResultsAt 1 week and 1, 2,3, 6 months after treatment, the average logMAR BCVA was 0.65±0.61, 0.56±0.61, 0.46±0.55, 0.56±0.71, 0.44±0.48 respectively. During 1, 2, 3, 6 months after treatment, the mean logMAR BCVA were improved with statistically significant difference (Z=34.029, 47.294, 41.338, 43.603;P < 0.05), while 1 week after treatment showed no obvious improvement (Z=21.941,P > 0.05). At 1 week and 1, 2, 3, 6 months after treatment, the average CMT was (285.89±96.69), (256.65±143.39), (278.68±156.92), (290.11±188.17), (217.15±48.04) μm respectively. At 1 week and 1,2,3,6 months after treatment, the mean CMT were all decreased with statistically significant difference (Z=68.500, 98.735, 93.235, 91.132, 109.162; P < 0.05). There was a positive correlation between the prognosis visual acuity and preoperative visual acuity (r=0.682,P < 0.05). However,there was no correlation between the prognosis vision and the degree of macular edema before treatment (r=0.078,P > 0.05). Before and 3, 6 months after treatment, BCVA was negatively correlated with CMT (r=0.491, 0.416, 0.386; P < 0.05), while there was no correlation in other time points (r=0.145, 0.217, 0.177; P > 0.05). Systemic adverse reactions and persistent intraocular pressure elevation, iatrogenic cataract, retinal detachment, retinal tear, endophthalmitis and ocular complications were never found in the follow-up period. ConclusionIntravitreal conbercept is a safe and effective approach for RVO,which can significantly improve visual acuity and reduce CMT.