Objective To study the current clinical application and advancement of microbioecological preparation. Methods Literatures about microbioecological preparation published in China and abroad were collected and reviewed. Results The microbioecological preparation has been widely used at present. It is used to rebuild a balanced microbial population in human body, particularly in intestinal, to promote the stability of internal environment, control dysbacteriosis and to treat a variety of gastrointestinal diseases associated with ectopic microbial population. Conclusion Although microbioecological preparation has been widely used in clinical settings, its effect yet should be further supported and evaluated both by large sample research in randomized double-blind control trails and evidence-based medicine.
With the popularization of digestive endoscopy in children, colonoscopy has been widely used. As the basis of digestive endoscopy, bowel preparation directly affects the diagnosis and treatment results of colonoscopy. Compared with adults, the functioning of important organs of children is immature, and their ability of cognition, communication and tolerance are weak. Their structure of the digestive tract is also significantly different in different ages. However, there have been no existing evidence-based guidelines on bowel preparation for digestive endoscopy of Chinese children. Therefore, it is important to develop evidence-based guidelines for bowel preparation combined with the clinical practice in China. In order to provide guidance and decision-making basis for Chinese pediatricians, we collaborated with multidisciplinary experts, based on existing evidence, adopted the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach, followed the Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) to develop this guideline for bowel preparation related to the diagnosis and treatment of children's digestive endoscopy.
Objective To investigate the effects of celecoxib-poly lactide-co-glycolide microparticles (CEL-PLGA-MS) on rat retina after intravitreal injection. Methods A total of 32 male Brown Norway rats were randomly divided into CEL-PLGA-MS group and celecoxib group, 16 rats in each group. The rats in CEL-PLGA-MS group were divided into four dosage group, four rats in each group, which received intravitreal injection of PLGA with celecoxib at the concentration of 40, 80, 160, 320 mu;mol/L, respectively. The rats in celecoxib group were divided into four dosage group, four rats in each group, which received intravitreal injection of celecoxib at the concentration of 40, 80, 160, 320 mu;mol/L, respectively. Phosphate buffer solution (PBS) was injected in two rats as PBS control group. Two rats as normal control group received no treatment. The difference of retinal thickness among groups was measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT). The morphological and histological change of retina was evaluated under light microscope and transmission electron microscope. Results There was no difference of retinal thickness between normal control group and PBS control group (F=0.12,P＞0.05). At the first week after injection, the retinal thickness of CEL-PLGA-MS group and celecoxib group were thicker than that in normal control group and PBS control group (F=9.62, 46.13;P＜0.01). The retinal thickness of celecoxib group was thicker than that in CEL-PLGA-MS group (F=165.15,P＜0.01). The retinal thickness was estimated equal among 40, 80, 320 mu;mol/L dosage groups in CEL-PLGA-MS group (F=4.79,P＜0.01). The retinal thickness of 160, 320 mu;mol/L dosage group were thicker than that in 40, 80 mu;mol/L dosage group in celecoxib group (F=28.10,P＜0.01). At the second week after injection, there was no difference of retinal thickness between CEL-PLGA-MS and celecoxib group (F=3.79,P＞0.05); the retinal thickness of CEL-PLGA-MS and celecoxib group became thinner gradually compare to the first week after injection (F=7.28, 103.99; P＜0.01). At the fourth week after injection, the retinal thickness of celecoxib group was thicker than that in CEL-PLGA-MS group (F=19.11,P＜0.01). The retinal thickness of CEL-PLGA-MS group was approximately the same to normal control group and PBS control group (F=2.02,P＞0.05). The retinal thickness of celecoxib group was thicker than that in normal control group and PBS control group. No considerable abnormality of the retina was seen by light microscope and the retinal thickness corresponded with the values measured by OCT at the first week after injection. The abnormal structures of the retina were seen in 160, 320 mu;mol/L dosage group of celecoxib group and inner changed evidently by the transmission electron microscope. Disordered arrangement of microfilaments, dilated microtubule and some mitochondria vacuolation were observed in 320mu;mol/L dosage group of celecoxib group. Others changed slightly. Conclusions CEL-PLGA-MS has less toxicity on the retina than free-celecoxib after intravitreal injection. The safety of intravitreal injection with CEL-PLGA-MS is better than celecoxib.
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX) in the treatment of active non-infectious uveitis macular edema (NIU-ME).MethodsA retrospective observational study. From February 2018 to February 2019, 23 patients (26 eyes) were included in the study who were diagnosed with NIU-ME at the Department of Ophthalmology, Central Theater Command General Hospital and received intravitreal DEX treatment. Among 23 patients, there were 8 males (8 eyes) and 15 females (18 eyes); the average age was 46.9 years; the average course of disease was 9.2±2.4 months. All the affected eyes underwent BCVA and intraocular pressure examination; at the same time, OCT was used to measure the central retinal thickness (CMT) of the macula. Snellen visual acuity chart was used for visual inspection. The average BCVA of the affected eye was 0.281±0.191, the average intraocular pressure was 16.2±0.8 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), and the average CMT was 395.4±63.7 μm. Among the 23 patients, 8 patients had middle uveitis and 15 patients had posterior uveitis. Seven patients had received intravenous infusion of methylprednisolone, 5 patients had been treated with methylprednisolone combined with immunosuppressive agents, and 11 patients had not received any treatment. All the affected eyes were treated with DEX intravitreal injection. Patients received repeated visual acuity, intraocular pressure and OCT examination with follow-up after injection. During the follow-up period, patients with recurrence of edema or poor efficacy, systemic methylprednisolone and intravitreal reinjection of DEX, triamcinolone acetonide or methotrexate should be considered based on the patient's own conditions. We observed the changes of BCVA, intraocular pressure and CMT before and after injection in the affected eyes, and analyzed the variance of a single repeated measurement factor. At the same time, we observed the occurrence of ocular adverse reactions and systemic complications.ResultsAfter treatment 1.2±0.4, 3.3±0.3, 6.7±1.1, 9.2±1.1, 12.2±0.6 months, the BCVA of the affected eyes were 0.488±0.296, 0.484±0.266, 0.414± 0.247, 0.411±0.244 and 0.383±0.232; CMT was 280.2±42.7, 271.0±41.4, 292.5±42.9, 276.2±40.5, 268.4±26.6 μm, respectively. Compared with before treatment, the BCVA and CMT of the all eyes increased after treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (F=30.99, 5 196.92; P＜0.000). Among 23 eyes completed a 12-month follow-up, 13 eyes (56.5%) received 2 injections, 3 eyes (13.0%) received 3 injections, and other 7 eyes (30.4%) received only 1 injection. After treatment 1.2±0.4 months, 5 patients (6 eyes) with intraocular pressure＞25 mmHg gradually returned to normal after treatment with two eye drops for lowering intraocular pressure; 1 patient (2 eyes) with intraocular pressure＞40 mmHg, the intraocular pressure gradually returned to normal after 3 kinds of eye drops for lowering intraocular pressure.ConclusionIntravitreal injection of DEX in the treatment of NIU-ME can improve the visual acuity of the affected eye and reduce CMT.
ObjectiveTo observe the effectiveness and safety of pseudomonas aeruginosa preparation in treating refractory seroma after breast cancer surgery.MethodsA total of 76 patients with refractory seroma after breast cancer surgery who underwent surgery from October 2018 to August 2019 in our hospital were selected. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups. The patients in the control group (n=36) adopted negative pressure drainage connected with indwelling needle in the lower position of the seroma chamber; on the basis, patients in the experimental group (n=400) were injected with pseudomonas aeruginosa preparation into the seroma chamber. The drainage time, total drainage volume, recurrence rate, and incidence of complications of the two groups were compared.ResultsThere were 4 cases in the experimental group and 3 cases in the control group were lost followed-up, so only 69 cases enrolled in data analysis. The drainage time, total drainage volume, and the recurrence rate of the experimental group were all shorter or less than those of the control group (P<0.05). But there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the experimental group and the control group (P>0.05), such as fever, inflamed skin, and infection of incision.ConclusionPseudomonas aeruginosa preparation is an effective treatment for refractory seroma after breast cancer surgery, which can shorten the drainage time and promote wound healing.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of discharge preparation service in elderly patients with chronic diseases.MethodsCNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, PubMed and EMbase databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trails (RCTs) on the discharge preparation service for elderly patients with chronic diseases from January, 2000 to January, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 7 RCTs, involving 884 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: after the hospitalization preparation service, the incidence of acute complication (RR=0.38, 95%CI 0.15 to 0.98, P=0.04), patient compliance behavior (SMD=0.54, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.83, P=0.000 3), exercise capacity (SMD=2.65, 95%CI 0.25 to 5.04, P=0.03), and nursing satisfaction (SMD=0.71, 95%CI 0.10 to 1.33, P=0.02) significantly improved. However, there were no significant differences in emergency hospital admission for acute complications (RR=0.25, 95%CI 0.06 to 1.11, P=0.07), self-care ability (SMD=2.18, 95%CI −1.02 to 5.38, P=0.18), activity of daily living (ADL) (SMD=0.56, 95%CI −0.47 to 1.59, P=0.28).ConclusionsThe current evidence shows that after implementation of the discharge preparation service, the incidence of acute complication, compliance behavior, exercise ability, and service satisfaction of the elderly patients with chronic diseases are significantly improved. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify above conclusion.
Objective To observe the effect of Fufang XueShuanTong (FXST) on prevention for retinal microangiopathy of diabetic rats. Methods Take the normal male Wistar rats as normal control group; take the streptozotocin (STZ) Wistar rats as diabetic model group. And then the diabetic model group was divided into two groups: diabetic control group (without other treatment) and FXST treatment group (with FXST at dose 900 mg/kg, by the way of given medicine from esophagus to stomach, 1 time/day, experimental period was 20 weeks). When all the animals had been raised for 20 weeks, not only retinal digesting preparations were used, the endothelium/pericyte ratio (E/P ratio) and micro-vascular changes were observed by microscope, vascular relative area were measured by image system，but also the thickness of capillary basement membrane, the ultrastructural changes of endothelium and pericyte were observed by transmission electron microscope. Results On the 20th week, retinal digesting preparations showed that acellular capillaries, irregular vessel nets, segmental expansion, segmental stricture even occlusion, pericyte number decreased obviously, E/P ratio increased, vascular relative area increased and ghosts of pericytes etc in diabetic control group. Compared to diabetic control group, the retinal changes of FXST treatment group was lighter, the E/P ratio and vascular relative area were closer to normal control group. Transmission electron microscopy results showed that thickness of basement membrane was increased in DM group, vascular changes was light in FXST treated group. Conclusions FXST can prevent the changes of micrangium in diabetic rats effectively. （Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis，2008，24：272-275）
ObjectiveTo determine the benefits and harms of mechanical bowel preparation(MBP) in elective colorectal surgery. MethodsCochrane systematic evaluation was used to search through Cochrane libraries of clinical comparative trials, PubMed, Embase, Cancer Lit, and the Chinese BioMedical Literature on disc. The quality of literatures was independently evaluated and cross-checked by two evaluators, indicator for assessment including anastomotic leak, overall surgical site infection(SSI), extra-abdominal septic complications, wound infections, reoperation or second intervention rate, and death. The results were analysed with RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsFourteen RCTs were included in this analysis with a total number of 5 373 patients. Comparing with no MBP for elective colorectal surgery, the study results showed that MBP had not reduce any postoperative complications when concerning anastomotic leak[OR(95% CI), 1.08(0.82-1.43);P=0.56];overall SSI[OR(95% CI), 1.26(0.94-1.68);P=0.12];extra-abdominal septic complications[OR(95% CI), 0.98(0.81-1.18);P=0.81];wound infections[OR(95% CI), 1.21(1.00-1.46);P=0.05];reoperation or second intervention rate[OR(95% CI), 1.11(0.86-1.45);P=0.42], and death[OR(95% CI), 0.97(0.63-1.48);P=0.88]. ConclusionNo evidence supporting the use of MBP in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. MBP should be omitted in routine clinical practice.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of dyclonine and lidocaine for preparation before gastroscopy.MethodsPubMed, CNKI, CBM, VIP and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of dyclonine vs. lidocaine for preparation before gastroscopy from inception to December 31st, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 11 RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: dyclonine could improve anesthetic effect (RR=1.38, 95%CI 1.31 to 1.47, P<0.000 01), and was more capable to remove bubble (RR=1.40, 95%CI 1.28 to 1.52,P<0.000 01), and had superior textures (RR=1.43, 95%CI 1.18 to 1.74,P=0.000 3).ConclusionsOral dyclonine can improve the visual definition of gastric mucosa and anesthetic effect, and has superior textures. Thus, dyclonine can be regarded as a recommended option prior to gastroscopy. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
Objective We searched and reviewed medical evidence to find the guide of bowel preparation we should choose before large bowel preparation. Method Firstly, we put forward clinical questions. Secondly, we searched medical evidence from PubMed, MEDLINE, EMbase, Cochrane Library, Science and ACP in recent 10 years. And then we reviewed the results. Results We finally identified 17 literatures including 2 system reviews, 6 meta-analyses and 9 randomized control trials which included 4 multicentre randomized clinical trials. Most of literature suggested that there was no evidence showing the benefit of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP). No MBP before large bowel surgery would not increase rate of anastomotic leakage. On the contrary, MBP may increase the percentage of anastomotic leakage and wound infection. Considering the research with the clinical situation, we produced a new method of simplified MBP to treat the patient. It reached the predictive effect. Conclusion No evidence of systematic review and meta-analysis supports the benefit of BMP. The new simplified bowel preparation before surgery in West China Hospital was worthy to test.