ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effect of high-flow nasal cannula in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure.MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCT) or cohort studies on the efficacy of high-flow oxygen therapy in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure were reviewed by computer in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and China Knowledge Network, Wanfang and VIP databases. The group used HFNC and the control group used a mask or a nasal catheter to give oxygen-based conventional oxygen therapy (COT) or noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Two investigators conducted quality assessments and data extractions based on the Cochrane Collaboration Risk Assessment Manual and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. The main outcome measures included tracheal intubation rate, and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. The secondary outcomes included ICU hospitalization time.ResultsThe study included 13 articles (4 RCTs, 9 cohort studies), a total of 1133 subjects, with 583 in the HFNC group and 550 in the control group (280 in the COT and 270 in the NIV). Meta-analysis showed that HFNC was significantly different from COT in reducing tracheal intubation rate in immunocompromised patients with respiratory failure (OR=0.49, 95%CI 0.33 - 0.72, P=0.0003), but no statistical significance compared with NIV (OR=0.73, 95%CI 0.52 - 1.02, P=0.07); two-combination analysis showed that HFNC had a significant advantage in reducing tracheal intubation rate compared with COT/NIV (combined OR=0.61, 95%CI 0.47 - 0.79, P=0.0002). In terms of ICU mortality, there was a statistically significant difference between HFNC and COT (OR=0.59, 95%CI 0.35 - 1.01, P=0.05) or NIV (OR=0.63, 95%CI 0.44 - 0.91, P=0.01). The results of the two subcombinations and analysis did not change (combined OR=0.62, 95%CI 0.46 - 0.83, P=0.002). In terms of ICU hospital stay, there was no statistically significant difference between HFNC and COT (MD=−4.52, 95%CI −9.43 - 0.39, P=0.07), but the difference was statistically significant compared with NIV (MD=−1.46, 95%CI −2.41 - −0.51, P =0.003); the two sub-combinations and analysis results showed significant difference (combined MD=−3.41, 95%CI −6.16 - −0.66, P=0.01). According to different research types, after subgroup analysis, the analysis results were not different from the combined results. Sensitivity analysis revealed that HFNC could significantly reduce the patient's ICU hospital stay compared with the control group oxygen therapy. The results of the funnel chart analysis show that there were publication offsets in the studies on tracheal intubation rate and ICU mortality included in the literature; studies on ICU hospital stays had a smaller publication offset.ConclusionsCompared with COT, HFNC can reduce the tracheal intubation rate of patients, but there is no significant difference compared with NIV; HFNC can reduce the ICU mortality of patients compared with COT/NIV. However, due to the high heterogeneity between the studies, whether HFNC can reduce ICU hospital stay remains to be further explored.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation( NPPV) in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( AECOPD) complicated with severe type Ⅱ respiratory failure.Methods 37 patients who were admitted fromJanuary 2008 to June 2009 due to AECOPD complicated with severe type Ⅱ respiratory failure and had received NPPV therapy were enrolled as a NPPV group. Another similar 42 cases who had not received NPPV therapy served as control. All subjects received standard medication therapy according to the guideline. Arterial blood gases before and after treatment, the duration of hospitalization and intubation rate were observed. Results The arterial pH, PaO2 ,and PaCO2 improved significantly after treatment as compared with baseline in both groups ( P lt; 0. 05) .Compared with the control group, the average duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter ( 10 ±5 vs.19 ±4 days, P lt;0. 05) and the intubation rate was significantly lower ( 2. 7% vs. 16. 7% , P lt;0. 05) in the NPPV group. Conclusion The use of NPPV in AECOPD patients complicated with severe type Ⅱ respiratory failure is effective in improving arterial blood gases, reducing the duration of hospitalization and intubation rate.
Objective To formulate an evidence-based position program for a ventilation patient with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods Based on fully assessing the patient’s conditions, the clinical problems were put forward according to PICO principles. Such database as The Cochrane Library (2005 to January 2011), DARE (March 2011), CCTR (March 2011), MEDLINE (1996 to January 2011) and CNKI (1979 to January 2011) were retrieved to collect high quality clinical evidence, and then the optimum nursing program was designed in line with patient’s conditions and relatives’ willingness. Results Three meta-analyses, three randomized controlled trials, one systematic review and one anterior-posterior self-control study were included. The available clinical evidence displayed that: a) the prone position adopting earlier, especially for patients with bilateral lungs or left lung functional disorder, was propitious to effectively improve the oxygenation condition and reduce the incidence of ventilator induced lung injury (VILI); b) The long-term prone position could increase the risk of pressure sore; c) The prone position could prolong the survival time, but there was no enough evidence to prove that it could obviously decrease the mortality rate of ARDS. So finally a nursing plan was made in combination with literature evidence and patient’s condition: adopting the prone position after onset within 24 to 36 hours, and enhancing the skin nursing to prevent pressure sore at the same time. After 4-week comprehensive therapy and prone position ventilation, the patient got obvious alleviated in oxygenation, with SpO 2 up to 90% to 100%, stable vital signs, and no more VILI and pressure sore. And then the patient was stopped applying ventilator, and transferred to a general ward for further treatment. Conclusion The earlier adoption of prone position ventilation for severe ARDS can improve oxygenation and reduce ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) and VILI, but whether it can prolong survival time and reduce mortality for mild ARDS or not still has to be proved with more high quality evidence in the future.
Objective To explore the predictive value of serum procalcitonin (PCT), D-dimer (D-D) and decoy receptor 3 (DcR3) for prognosis of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) and respiratory failure undergoing non-invasive ventilation (NIV). Methods A total of 95 patients with AECOPD and respiratory failure undergoing basic treatment and NIV in the hospital were retrospectively enrolled between September (n=65) 2017 and February 2021. According to prognosis after treatment, they were divided into a good prognosis group and a poor prognosis group (n=30). The general data of all patients were collected. The influencing factors of prognosis were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression model. The levels of DcR3, PCT and D-D were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, colloidal gold colorimetry and immunoturbidimetry. The patients condition was assessed by scores of acute physiology chronic health evaluation scoring system Ⅱ (APACHEⅡ). The partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) were recorded. And the above indexes between the two groups were compared. The relationship between DcR3, PCT, D-D and APACHEⅡ score, PaO2, PaCO2 was analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis. The prognostic value of DcR3, PCT and D-D was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results There was no significant difference in gender, GOLD grading or underlying diseases between the poor prognosis group and the good prognosis group (P>0.05), but there were significant differences in age, DcR3, PCT, D-D, APACHEⅡ score, PaO2 and PaCO2 after treatment (P<0.05). DcR3, PCT, D-D, APACHEⅡ score and PaCO2 in the poor prognosis group were higher than those in the good prognosis group, while PaO2 was lower than that in the good prognosis group (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that DcR3 ≥5.50 ng/mL (OR=21.889), PCT ≥ 5.00 μg/L (OR=3.782), D-D ≥3.00 μg/L (OR=4.162) and APACHEⅡ score ≥20 points (OR=2.540) were all influencing factors of prognosis (P<0.05). The results of Pearson correlation analysis showed that DcR3, PCT and D-D were positively correlated with APACHEⅡ score and PaCO2, while negatively correlated with PaO2 (P<0.05). The results of ROC curve analysis showed that area under ROC curve of DcR3, PCT and D-D for predicting the prognosis were 0.745 (95%CI 0.631 - 0.859), 0.691 (95%CI 0.579 - 0.803) and 0.796 (95%CI 0.696 - 0.895), respectively (P<0.05). Conclusion The serum DcR3, PCT and D-D levels are related to disease progression in patients with AECOPD and respiratory failure after NIV, which have good predictive efficiency for prognosis and can be applied as important biological indexes to evaluate prognosis and guide treatment.
Objective To investigate the physiological effects of different oxygen injection site on ventilatory status and oxygenation during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation ( NPPV) with portable noninvasive ventilators. Methods A prospective crossover randomized study was performed. Oxygen injection site was randomized into the outlet of the ventilator, the connection site between mask and circuit, and the mask under the condition of leak port immobilized in the mask. Oxygen flow was retained in the baseline level at the initial 5 to 10 minutes, and adjusted to obtain arterial oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry ( SpO2 ) ranging from 90% to 95% after SpO2 remains stable. SpO2 at the initial 5 to 10 minutes, oxygen flow, ventilatory status, oxygenation, hemodynamics and dyspnea indexes at0. 5 hour, 1 hour, and 2 hours of NPPV were compared between different oxygen injection sites. Results 10 patients were recruited into the study. Under the condition of the same oxygen flow, SpO2 with oxygen injection site in the outlet of the ventilator was significantly higher than that with oxygen injection site in the connection site between mask and circuit [ ( 98.9 ±0.9) % vs. ( 96.9 ±1.1) % , P =0. 003] , whereas SpO2 with oxygen injection site in the connection site between mask and circuit was significantly higher than that with oxygen injection site in the mask [ ( 96.9 ±1.1) % vs. ( 94.1 ±1.6) %, P = 0.000] . Oxygen flow with oxygen injection site in the mask was statistically higher than that with oxygen injection site at other sites ( P lt; 0.05) . Arterial oxygen tension/ oxygen flow with oxygen injection site in the outlet of the ventilator was significantly higher than that with oxygen injection site in the connection site between mask and circuit ( 67.9 ±31.1 vs. 37.0 ±15.0, P =0.007) , and than that with oxygen injection site in the mask ( 67.9 ± 31.1 vs. 25.0 ±9.1, P = 0.000) . pH, arterial carbon dioxide tension, hemodynamics and dyspnea indexes were not significantly different between different oxygen injection sites ( P gt; 0.05) .Conclusions When portable noninvasive ventilator was applied during NPPV, oxygen injection site significantly affects improvement of oxygenation, and shows a trend for affecting ventilatory status and work of breathing. When the leak port was immobilized in the mask, the nearer oxygen injection site approaches the outlet of the ventilator, the more easily oxygenation is improved and the lower oxygen flow is demanded.
ObjectiveTo explore the value of three brief scales (BAP-65 class, DECAF score, and CAPS) on assessing the severity of acute exacerbation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD) complicated by hypercapnic respiratory failure. MethodsTwo hundred and forty-four cases with acute exacerbation of COPD complicated by hypercapnic respiratory failure, admitted in West China Hospital from August 2012 to December 2013, were analyzed retrospectively.The scores of each scale were calculated.The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) of each scale for hospital mortality, mechanical ventilation use, mortality of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, invasive mechanical use were analyzed and compared. ResultsThe AUROCs of BAP-65 class, DECAF score and CAPS for hospital mortality were 0.731, 0.765, and 0.711; for mechanical ventilation were 0.638, 0.702, and 0.617; for mortality of patients requiring mechanical ventilation were 0.672, 0.707, and 0.677; for invasive mechanical ventilation use were 0.745, 0.732, and 0.627(BAP-65 vs.CAPS, P < 0.05).Mortality and mechanical ventilation use increased as the three scales escalated.In the patients whose BAP-65 or DECAF score were more than 4 points, the hospital mortality was nearly 50%, and about 95% of the patients underwent mechanical ventilation. ConclusionsThe BAP-65 class, DECAF score, and CAPS of patients on admission have predictive values on assessing the severity of acute exacerbation in patients with COPD complicated by hypercapnic respiratory failure, especially the simple and practical BAP-65 class and DECAF score.
Objective To investigate the efficacy and prognostic risk factors of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in elderly patients with respiratory failure. Methods Clinical data of 172 elderly patients with respiratory failure admitted to 363 Hospital from April 2020 to August 2022 were retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into an observation group (n=86) and a control group (n=86) according to treatment method. The observation group (54 males, 32 females), mean 68.67±2.36 years old, received HFNC oxygen therapy. The control group (52 males, 34 females), mean 68.12±2.14 years old, received conventional oxygen therapy. According to the prognosis after HFNC treatment, the observation group was subdivided into a poor prognosis group (n=21) and a good prognosis group (n=65). The clinical effects of different treatment methods in the two groups were analyzed, and the risk factors affecting prognosis of elderly patients with respiratory failure treated by HFNC were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. A line graph model was constructed, and the model was verified by receiver operator characteristic curve and cumulative gain graph. Results Repeated measures ANOVA was conducted on the oxygen therapy indicators of the two groups of patients. The results showed that pH, PaO2, PaCO2, and respiratory rate all have statistical significance in terms of time effect (F=423.25, P<0.001; F=326.25, P<0.001; F=128.79, P<0.001; F=323.16, P<0.001), inter-group effect (F=128.79, P<0.001; F=205.46, P<0.001; F=310.52, P<0.001; F=123.15, P<0.001), and interactive effect (F=111.06, P<0.001; F=198.76, P<0.001; F=134.28, P<0.001; F=112.47, P<0.001). This indicated that the impact of time on pH, PaO2, PaCO2, and respiratory rate differs depending on the treatment method. The scores of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHEⅡ), the level of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), the heart rate before treatment, the posterior root of tongue fall, the initial HFNC flow and the duration of HFNC in the poor prognosis group were significantly higher than those in the good prognosis group. Initial PaO2/FiO2 was significantly lower than that in the good prognosis group (P<0.05). Multiple factor analysis showed that APACHEⅡ score>17 points, BNP level>150 ng/L before treatment, heart rate >105 times/min before treatment, posterior root of tongue drop, initial HFNC flow>55 L/min, initial PaO2/FiO2<150 mmHg were independent influencing factors for poor prognosis of elderly patients with respiratory failure treated by HFNC. The histogram model showed that the total score of the above 6 indicators is 284, corresponding to a probability of poor prognosis of 71.6%, which proved that the prediction ability of this model is good. Conclusions The application of HFNC in elderly patients with respiratory failure has a significant effect. APACHEⅡ score, BNP level before treatment, heart rate before treatment, posterior root of tongue fall, initial HFNC flow, initial PaO2/FiO2 are all risk factors affecting the prognosis, which should be paid attention to in clinic to improve the therapeutic effect.
Objective To analyze the risk factors of treatment failure by noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) due to acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), and explore the best time that NPPV be replaced by invasive ventilation when NPPV failure occurs. Methods The data of patients with ARF due to AECOPD who were treated with NPPV from January 2013 to December 2015 were retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into two groups: the NPPV success group and the NPPV failure group (individuals who required endotracheal intubation or tracheotomy at any time). The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) Ⅱ score was analyzed; the Glasgow Coma Scale score, respiratory rate (RR), pH value, partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio, and partial pressure of carbon dioxide were also analyzed at admission, after 2 hours of NPPV, and after 24 hours of NPPV. Results A total of 185 patients with ARF due to AECOPD were included. NPPV failed in 35.1% of the patients (65/185). Multivariate analysis identified the following factors to be independently associated with NPPV failure: APACHEⅡscore≥30 [odds ratio (OR)=20.603, 95% confidence interval (CI) (5.309, 80.525), P<0.001], RR at admission≥35 per minute [OR=3.723, 95%CI (1.197, 11.037), P=0.020], pH value after 2 hours of NPPV<7.25 [OR=2.517, 95%CI (0.905, 7.028), P=0.070], PaO2 after 2 hours of NPPV<60 mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa) [OR=3.915, 95%CI (1.374, 11.508), P=0.010], and PaO2/FiO2 after 2 hours of NPPV<200 mm Hg [OR=4.024, 95%CI (1.542, 11.004), P=0.010]. Conclusion When patients with ARF due to AECOPD have a higher severity score, have a rapid RR at admission, or fail to improve in terms of pH and oxygenation after 2 hours of NPPV, the risk of NPPV failure is higher.
Objective To develop and validate a nomogram model that can be used to predict the prognosis of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients with type II respiratory failure. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 300 hospitalized AECOPD patients in the People’s Hosipital of Leshan from August 2016 to December 2021. Patients were grouped into a training cohort (n=210) and a validation cohort (n=90) in a 7:3 ratio. The variables for the patients in the training cohort were selected using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify independent risk factors of poor prognosis in AECOPD with type II respiratory failure, and a nomogram model was constructed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted for the training and validation cohorts, and the area under ROC curve (AUC) was calculated.The model was validated by conducting the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, drawing calibration curves, and performing decision curve analysis(DCA).ResultsCardiovascular disease, lymphocyte percentage, and red cell distribution width-standard deviation(RDW-SD) were identified as independent risk factors of poor prognosis for AECOPD patients with type II respiratory failure (P<0.05). The AUC values for the training and validation cohorts were 0.742 (95%CI: 0.672-0.812) and 0.793 (95%CI: 0.699-0.888), respectively. The calibration curves of the two cohorts are close to the desirable curves.The Hosmer-Lemeshow test P-values were greater than 0.05, indicating good clinical practicality. The DCA curve indicates that the model has good clinical value. Conclusions The clinical prediction model, based on factors such as cardiovascular disease, lymphocyte percentage, and RDW-SD, showed good predictive value for AECOPD patients complicated by type II respiratory failure.
During the new coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there has been controversy over whether emergency surgical management should be performed or not in the patients with COVID-19. Stanford type A aortic dissection is a very urgent life-threatening disease, and guidelines recommend surgical treatment for patients with type A aortic dissection in the first instance. However, intraoperative extracorporeal circulation can be fatal to patients recovering from COVID-19. During the pandemic, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has played an important role in supporting COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure. This article reports a successful V-V ECMO treatment for a Stanford type A aortic dissection patient, who suffered respiratory failure caused by COVID-19 after emergency surgery.