ObjectiveTo explore a surgery of effective weight loss concentrating on gut hormone release. MethodsWistar rats were fed with high-fat diet for inducing obesity and which randomly divided into sleeve gastrectomy plus decent jejunoileal bypass (SJB) group (n=12), sleeve gastrectomy (SG) group (n=12), and sham operation (SO) group (n=11), the body weight reduction, food intake, plasma ghrelin level, and glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) level were compared among three groups. ResultsThere were no differences of the body weight and food intake before operation among three groups (Pgt;0.05). Compared with the SO group, the body weight descended and the food intake decreased obviously on 1-8 weeks after operation in the SJB group (Plt;0.05), the body weight of rats on 1-8 weeks after operation in the SJB group significantly descended as compared with the SG group (Plt;0.05), and the food intake of rats on week 3, 6, 7, and 8 in the SJB group signicantly decreased as compared with the SG group (Plt;0.05). There were no differences of the levels of the plasma ghrelin and GLP-1 before operation among three groups (Pgt;0.05). Compared with SO group, the plasma ghrelin level decreased and the GLP-1 level increased in the SJB group and the SG group, meanwhile the SJB group significantly decreased level of plasma ghrelin and elevated level of plasma GLP-1 as compared with the SG group on week 8 after operation(Plt;0.05). ConclusionThe data demonstrate that SJB could represent an effective way of losing weight by interfering with food intake and obesity related hormone levels.
Objective To summarize and analyze the application value of triple stomach shaping technique in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Methods The clinical data of patients undergoing simple LSG with triple stomach shaping technique carried out by the General Surgery Obesity and Metabolic Diseases Center of Chengdu Third People’s Hospital from January to December 2021 were retrospectively collected, recording the operative time and the occurrence of recent complications such as postoperative nausea/vomiting, gastric leakage, bleeding, obstruction/torsion within 30 days after operation. Results A total of 966 patients were collected, including 294 males and 672 females. The age was 16–65 years, average age was (32.8±8.6) years. Body mass index was 27.5–47.2 kg/m2, average was (34.2±3.5) kg/m2. All operations were successfully completed without conversion to laparotomy. The operative time was 45–170 min, average was (100.2+33.4) minutes. Postoperative nausea/vomiting occurred in 484 cases (50.10%), bleeding in 2 cases (0.21%, intraperitoneal bleeding in 1 case, intragastric bleeding in 1 case), gastric leakage in 1 case (0.10%, grade B leakage), and no perioperative death occurred. Hospitalization time was 4–24 d, average was (7.55±2.47) d. Two patients (0.21%) were hospitalized again due to nausea and vomiting within 30 days after operation, they were relieved and discharged after conservative medical treatment. Conclusion Triple gastric shaping technology is more physiological, safe and suitable for promotion.
ObjectiveTo compare effectiveness of single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) and single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass on weight loss and glucose regulating as well as difference in micronutrient deficiency in obese rats with type 2 diabetes mellitus. MethodsThirty-six Spraque-Dawley rats fed with high fat diet combined with intraperitoneal injection of low-dose streptozotocin (35 mg/kg) for 1 month were used to induce obese rats with type 2 diabetes mellitus, then were randomly averagely divided into 3 groups: SADI-S group, SASI group, and sham operation (SO) group. Eight rats from numbered rats of each group were randomly selected to carry out experimental observation. The rats’ body weight, food intake, and fasting blood glucose (FBG) were measured from before operation to postoperative 1–6 months. Meanwhile blood was collected before surgery, as well as at month 1 and 6 after surgery for oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) and insulin resistance testing (ITT). Serum glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1), hemoglobin, and albumin levels, as well as vitamin B12, calcium, and ferrum concentrations were measured before surgery as well as at month 1 and 6 after surgery. Results① The body weight, food intake (except 5–6 months), and FBG level in the SADI-S group and SASI group were lower than the SO group (P<0.05) from 1- to6-month after operation, and all obviously decreased at month 1 after operation (P<0.05), but there was no statistical differences between the SADI-S group and SASI group (P>0.05). ② The postoperative OGTT and ITT blood glucose levels in the SADI-S group and SASI group were lower than those in the SO group (P<0.05) and were lower than those in the preoperative levels (P<0.05), and the SADI-S group had a lower OGTT blood glucose level than the SASI group at month 6 after operation (P<0.05). ③ The GLP-1 levels of the SADI-S group and SASI group were higher than that of the SO group (P<0.05), and higher than before operation at month 6 after operation (P<0.05) , but there was no statistical difference was found between the SADI-S group and SASI group after operation (P>0.05). ④ The postoperative albumin levels of the SADI-S group and SASI groups= were lower than of the SO group (P<0.05) and were lower than before operation, and albumin level of the SADI-S group was lower than of the SASI group at postoperative month 6 (P<0.05); while the hemoglobin had no statistical differences among the 3 groups (P>0.05). ⑤ The ferrum concentration of the SADI-S group was lower than that of the SASI group and SO group at 1 month after operation (all P<0.05), while it increased slightly at month 6 after operation and had no statistical difference between the SADI-S group and SASI group (P>0.05); the calcium concentrations of the SADI-S group and SASI group only at 6 month after operation were lower than those of the SO group (P<0.05), and were lower as compared with before operation (P<0.05) , but no statistical difference was found between the SADI-S group and SASI group (P>0.05); the vitamin B12 had no statistical differences among the 3 groups (P>0.05). ConclusionsFor obese rats with type 2 diabetes mellitus, SADI-S and SASI have similar weight loss effect. Long-term glucose reduction of SADI-S shows a advantage than SASI, but influence of postoperative micronutrients of SASI is inferior to SASI.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on obesity and its comorbidities.MethodThe literatures about LSG in the treatment of obesity and its comorbidities were collected and summarized.ResultsLSG could not only effectively reduce the weight of patients with obesity, but also obviously alleviate comorbidities related to obesity, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, polycystic ovary syndrome, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and so on.ConclusionsLSG has a definite and effective long-term weight loss effect, which is equal to other common weight loss methods. It has been recognized by more and more patients and clinicians because it has advantages of simple operation, safety, high efficiency and fewer complications. However, therapeutic effects of some comorbidities, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, are still controversial and need further tobe studied.
ObjectiveTo compared weight loss and metabolic improvement effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in treatment of obese males and females. MethodsAccording to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the obese patients were retrospectively collected, who underwent LSG from January 2020 to June 2021 in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, and there were complete preoperative data and postoperative follow-up data at month 1, 3, 6, and 12. The weight loss and metabolic improvement effects of obese males and females were compared, as well as the remissions of diabetes and hyperlipidemia at the 12th month after surgery were observed. ResultsA total of 129 eligible obese patients were included, including 44 obese males and 85 obese females. The preoperative body mass index (BMI), fasting blood glucose (FBG) level, and insulin level of the obese males were higher than those of the obese females (P<0.05). ① Weight loss effect after LSG: For both obese males and females, the change value (Δ) of BMI (all change values of the indexes were the difference between preoperative and postoperative value in this study), the percentage of excess body weight loss (EWL%), and percentage of total body weight loss showed continuous upward trends within the observation time range (P<0.05). And it was found that the obese males’ ΔBMI was higher than that of the obese females at the 1st and 3rd month after surgery (P<0.05), and the EWL% of the obese males was lower than that of the obese females at the 3rd, 6th, and 12th month after operation (P<0.05). ② Metabolic improvement effect after LSG: Blood glucose and lipid metabolism indicators in both male and female patients（ΔFBG, ΔINS, ΔHbA1c, ΔTC and ΔTG) changed the fastest at 1 month after operation, and the change became flat after 3 months, except for males ΔTC index (P>0.05), the overall difference between male and female patients at each time point after operation was statistically significant (P<0.05). After operation, the ΔFBG (at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th month) and Δinsulin (at the 3rd, 6th, and 12th month) in the obese males were higher than those in the obese females (P<0.05). The remission rates of diabetes and hyperlipidemia in the obese males and females at the 12th month after surgery were both higher, but there was no significant difference between the two groups [64.7% (11/17) versus 81.0% (17/21), χ2=0.578, P=0.447; 73.9% (17/23) versus 84.4% (27/32), χ2=0.378, P=0.539]. ConclusionsFrom the results of this study, LSG is an effective method in treatment of obesity and its complications for both males and females. Bariatric surgery should be suggested to perform as soon as possible for obese males with poor metabolic status.
ObjectiveTo compare the postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI), and to explore the risk factors for PONV. MethodA total of 220 patients at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from June 2022 to December 2022 were prospectively collected, and were randomly divided into the LSG group and the SASI group; the general condition of the patients was recorded. PONV was assessed on the POD0, POD1, POD2, POD30, POD60, POD90, using the Rhodes index score.ResultsThe total Rhodes index score in the LSG group was higher than that in the SASI group [(25.56±13.54) vs. (16.06±11.28), P＜0.05]. The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that female (P=0.014), LSG (P＜0.001), young age (P=0.050), and low BMI (P=0.019) were risk factors for PONV. ConclusionsCompared with LSG, the Rhodes index score after SASI is low. For young women with low BMI, special attention should be paid to the prevention and treatment of PONV after LSG.
ObjectiveTo analyze why sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with jejunojejunal bypass (SG-JJB), despite being the second most common bariatric procedure in China, has neither been recommended in domestic and international guidelines nor endorsed by expert consensus; investigate the primary obstacles to its standardization and widespread adoption; and propose strategies leveraging China’s extensive clinical experience to refine the technique, establish standardized protocols, and address existing challenges, thereby defining its future role in metabolic surgery. MethodsBy systematically reviewing the evolution, current evidence profile, and distinctions of SG-JJB compared to other SG-Plus procedures, this study focused on identifying constraints hindering its adoption. Concurrently, considering the characteristics of domestic healthcare resources, we analyzed the feasibility of procedural refinements, key steps for standardization, and solutions to potential challenges, thereby facilitating the optimization and standardization of SG-JJB. ResultsThe three key constraints hindering SG-JJB development were: risks of blind loop syndrome, uncertainty regarding optimal bypass limb length, and limited evidence on long-term efficacy. To address these issues, this study proposed leveraging China’s clinical and multi-center collaboration strengths to: conduct high-quality studies defining the impact of bypass length on outcomes, establish unified diagnostic and monitoring protocols for blind loop syndrome, and systematically collect longitudinal data to evaluate long-term efficacy, thereby informing evidence-based surgical standardization. ConclusionsSG-JJB holds significant potential in Chinese bariatric-metabolic practice, yet its standardization faces challenges. Addressing concerns about blind loop syndrome, defining optimal bypass limb length, and accumulating robust long-term efficacy data are pivotal to advancing SG-JJB standardization and adoption. Leveraging domestic clinical resources through multi-center collaborations, high-quality research, and evidence-based protocol development is the essential pathway to overcoming these barriers, achieving standardized implementation, and securing recognition in authoritative guidelines.
Sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition (SG-TB) was a novel bariatric and metabolic surgery that had received preliminary approval for its effectiveness and safety in reducing weight, improving diabetes, and other metabolic diseases. It showed promising prospects in clinical applications. However, SG-TB also faced some challenges including a small number of cases, insufficient clinical evidence, issues with anastomotic stoma and common channel design, bile reflux, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and malnutrition. Further research is needed to enhance the standardization of SG-TB procedures and provides reference for its wider implementation.
ObjectiveTo explore the necessity of staple-line reinforcement (SLR) during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) through evaluating its potential benefit and safety. MethodsA historical cohort study was conducted in the Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. The consecutive patients underwent LSG for morbid obesity by the same operative team from June 2022 to August 2023 were included, which were assigned into SLR group and un-SLR group according to the SLR or not. Both groups were assessed in terms of the operating time, postoperative hospital stay, total hospital stay, surgical costs, and complications. ResultsA total of 87 patients underwent the LSG from June 2022 to August 2023, all of whom were successfully completed without any conversion to open surgery. Among them, there were 34 cases in the SLR group and 53 cases in the un-SLR group. There were no statistical differences in the age, gender, body mass index, and so on between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no postoperative complications such as gastric leakage, bleeding, or gastrointestinal stenosis, and no perioperative death, as well as no case of reoperation within 30 d after surgery in all patients of the two groups. And there were no statistical differences in the postoperative hospital stay and total hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). However, it was found that the operative time was shorter (P<0.05), the surgical costs and total hospital stay costs were also less (P<0.05) in the un-SLR group as compared with the SLR group. ConclusionsBased on the analysis of cases data in this study, there is no added benefit in terms of reducing staple-line leak, bleeding, etc. in adopting SLR during LSG, and the operating time is prolonged and the cost is increased. So the necessity of the SLR or not during LSG needs to be further researched.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 8, 2014), CNKI and WanFang Data from inception to December 2014, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of LRYGB vs. LSG for obesity and T2DM. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 8 RCTs including 828 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:There were no significant differences between the LRYGB group and the LSG group in body mass index (MD=-1.02, 95%CI -2.90 to 0.86, P=0.29), remission rate of T2DM (OR=1.11, 95%CI 0.71 to 1.73, P=0.64), reoperation rate (OR=2.74, 95%CI 1.01 to 7.42, P=0.05), level of fasting plasma glucose (MD=2.71, 95%CI -0.80 to 6.21, P=0.13), and level of serum low density lipoprotein (MD=-23.85, 95%CI -47.20 to -0.50, P=0.05). However, the LSG group had lower postoperative complication rate (OR=2.28, 95%CI 1.43 to 3.62, P=0.000 5) than that of the LRYGB group. ConclusionIn short term, both LRYGB and LSG were equally efficient in the treatment of obesity and T2DM, but LSG has lower postoperative complication rate than LRYGB. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.