Application of Longshi Ability of Daily Life scale in telerehabilitation_West China Medical Journal

Authors：

LI Dongxia ,  WANG Yulong

Department of Rehabilitation, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518035, P. R. China;

Corresponding author：

WANG Yulong, Email: wangyulong@szu.edu.cn

Keywords：

Ability of daily life; assessment scale; telerehabilitation

DOI：

10.7507/1002-0179.202003436

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Telerehabilitation is a new rehabilitation technology, using internet to provide rehabilitation services for patients in remote areas or unaccessible to rehabilitation. Longshi Ability of Daily Life scale is fomulated based on Chinese living customs. The assessment content of the scale can clearly reflect the needs of the service object, and the assessment result can directly reflect the ability level of the assessment object. The scale has been put into use online on the mobile internet and amassed a certain amount of big data, which is of great significance to the adjustment of rehabilitation treatment, the continuity of nursing guidance, and the assurance of adequate social support and disability benefits for the disabled. In this paper, the application of Longshi Ability of Daily Life scale in telerehabilitation is described.

Citation： LI Dongxia, WANG Yulong. Application of Longshi Ability of Daily Life scale in telerehabilitation. West China Medical Journal, 2022, 37(3): 477-480. doi: 10.7507/1002-0179.202003436 Copy

1.	Basso DM, Lang CE. Consideration of dose and timing when applying interventions after stroke and spinal cord injury. J Neurol Phys Ther, 2017, 41(Suppl 3): S24-S31.
2.	Koenig MA, Kaplan PW. Measuring depth in still water: electrophysiologic indicators of residual consciousness in the unresponsive patient. Epilepsy Curr, 2018, 18(3): 147-150.
3.	Dodakian L, McKenzie AL, Le V, et al. A home-based telerehabilitation program for patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2017, 31(10/11): 923-933.
4.	Tousignant M, Mampuya WM. Telerehabilitation for patients with heart failure. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther, 2015, 5(1): 74-78.
5.	王玉龙, 吕星, 郭珊珊, 等. 日常生活自理能力情景图示评定方法的设计. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2018, 40(11): 840-843.
6.	Hung KG, Fong KN. Effects of telerehabilitation in occupational therapy practice: a systematic review. Hong Kong J Occup Ther, 2019, 32(1): 3-21.
7.	Chen J, Jin W, Zhang XX, et al. Telerehabilitation approaches for stroke patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2015, 24(12): 2660-2668.
8.	Brennan DM, Mawson S, Brownsell S. Telerehabilitation: enabling the remote delivery of healthcare, rehabilitation, and self management. Stud Health Technol Inform, 2009, 145: 231-248.
9.	Linder SM, Rosenfeldt AB, Bay RC, et al. Improving quality of life and depression after stroke through telerehabilitation. Am J Occup Ther, 2015, 69(2): 6902290020p1-6902290020p10.
10.	Benham S, Gibbs V. Exploration of the effects of telerehabilitation in a school-based setting for at-risk youth. Int J Telerehabil, 2017, 9(1): 39-46.
11.	龙建军, 王春宝, 刘铨权, 等. 康复医学精准化诊疗服务平台构建探索. 中国康复医学杂志, 2019, 34(10): 1237-1240.
12.	Azma K, RezaSoltani Z, Rezaeimoghaddam F, et al. Efficacy of tele-rehabilitation compared with office-based physical therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized clinical trial. J Telemed Telecare, 2018, 24(8): 560-565.
13.	Sharifi I, Talebi HA, Motaharifar M. A framework for simultaneous training and therapy in multilateral tele-rehabilitation. Comput Electr Eng, 2016, 56: 700-714.
14.	Schmeler MR, Schein RM, McCue M, et al. Telerehabilitation clinical and vocational applications for assistive technology: research, opportunities, and challenges. Int J Telerehabil, 2009, 1(1): 59-72.
15.	Theodoros D, Russell T. Telerehabilitation: current perspectives. Stud Health Technol Inform, 2008, 131: 191-209.
16.	Castiglia SF, Galeoto G, Lauta A, et al. The culturally adapted Italian version of the Barthel Index (IcaBI): assessment of structural validity, inter-rater reliability and responsiveness to clinically relevant improvements in patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation centers. Funct Neurol, 2017, 22(4): 221-228.
17.	Wang Y, Guo S, Zheng J, et al. User testing of the psychometric properties of pictorial-based disability assessment Longshi Scale by healthcare professionals and non-professionals: a Chinese study in Shenzhen. Clin Rehabil, 2019, 33(9): 1479-1491.
18.	Rollnik JD. The Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index (ERBI). Rehabilitation (Stuttg), 2011, 50(6): 408-411.
19.	Lam SC, Lee DT, Yu DS. Establishing CUTOFF values for the Simplified Barthel Index in elderly adults in residential care homes. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2014, 62(3): 575-577.
20.	国家市场监督管理总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 功能障碍者生活自理能力评定方法: GB/T 37103－2018. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2018.
21.	Gao Y, Wang Y, Li D, et al. Disability assessment in stroke: relationship among the pictorial-based Longshi Scale, the Barthel Index, and the modified Rankin Scale. Clin Rehabil, 2021, 35(4): 606-613.
22.	王玉龙, 李旭辉, 郭珊珊, 等. 反映肢体残疾人日常生活活动能力的主要指标筛选. 中国康复理论与实践, 2015, 21(11): 1333-1338.
23.	Wang Y, Li S, Pan W, et al. Evaluation of the disability assessment Longshi scale: a multicenter study. J Int Med Res, 2020, 48(7): 300060520934299.
24.	Zhou M, Liu X, Zha F, et al. Stroke outcome assessment: optimizing cutoff scores for the Longshi Scale, modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index. PLoS One, 2021, 16(5): e0251103.
25.	Zhao J, Liu X, Wan L, et al. A novel Longshi Scale measured activity of daily living disability in elderly patients affected by neurological diseases: a multi-center cross-sectional study in China. BMC Geriatr, 2021, 21(1): 348.
26.	Liu X, Zhou M, Zhao J, et al. Functional independence and disability evaluation in stroke patients: optimal cutoff scores for a pictorial-based Longshi Scale, Barthel Index, and Modified Rankin Scale. Front Neurol, 2022, 13: 710852.

1. Basso DM, Lang CE. Consideration of dose and timing when applying interventions after stroke and spinal cord injury. J Neurol Phys Ther, 2017, 41(Suppl 3): S24-S31.
2. Koenig MA, Kaplan PW. Measuring depth in still water: electrophysiologic indicators of residual consciousness in the unresponsive patient. Epilepsy Curr, 2018, 18(3): 147-150.
3. Dodakian L, McKenzie AL, Le V, et al. A home-based telerehabilitation program for patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2017, 31(10/11): 923-933.
4. Tousignant M, Mampuya WM. Telerehabilitation for patients with heart failure. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther, 2015, 5(1): 74-78.
5. 王玉龙, 吕星, 郭珊珊, 等. 日常生活自理能力情景图示评定方法的设计. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2018, 40(11): 840-843.
6. Hung KG, Fong KN. Effects of telerehabilitation in occupational therapy practice: a systematic review. Hong Kong J Occup Ther, 2019, 32(1): 3-21.
7. Chen J, Jin W, Zhang XX, et al. Telerehabilitation approaches for stroke patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2015, 24(12): 2660-2668.
8. Brennan DM, Mawson S, Brownsell S. Telerehabilitation: enabling the remote delivery of healthcare, rehabilitation, and self management. Stud Health Technol Inform, 2009, 145: 231-248.
9. Linder SM, Rosenfeldt AB, Bay RC, et al. Improving quality of life and depression after stroke through telerehabilitation. Am J Occup Ther, 2015, 69(2): 6902290020p1-6902290020p10.
10. Benham S, Gibbs V. Exploration of the effects of telerehabilitation in a school-based setting for at-risk youth. Int J Telerehabil, 2017, 9(1): 39-46.
11. 龙建军, 王春宝, 刘铨权, 等. 康复医学精准化诊疗服务平台构建探索. 中国康复医学杂志, 2019, 34(10): 1237-1240.
12. Azma K, RezaSoltani Z, Rezaeimoghaddam F, et al. Efficacy of tele-rehabilitation compared with office-based physical therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized clinical trial. J Telemed Telecare, 2018, 24(8): 560-565.
13. Sharifi I, Talebi HA, Motaharifar M. A framework for simultaneous training and therapy in multilateral tele-rehabilitation. Comput Electr Eng, 2016, 56: 700-714.
14. Schmeler MR, Schein RM, McCue M, et al. Telerehabilitation clinical and vocational applications for assistive technology: research, opportunities, and challenges. Int J Telerehabil, 2009, 1(1): 59-72.
15. Theodoros D, Russell T. Telerehabilitation: current perspectives. Stud Health Technol Inform, 2008, 131: 191-209.
16. Castiglia SF, Galeoto G, Lauta A, et al. The culturally adapted Italian version of the Barthel Index (IcaBI): assessment of structural validity, inter-rater reliability and responsiveness to clinically relevant improvements in patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation centers. Funct Neurol, 2017, 22(4): 221-228.
17. Wang Y, Guo S, Zheng J, et al. User testing of the psychometric properties of pictorial-based disability assessment Longshi Scale by healthcare professionals and non-professionals: a Chinese study in Shenzhen. Clin Rehabil, 2019, 33(9): 1479-1491.
18. Rollnik JD. The Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index (ERBI). Rehabilitation (Stuttg), 2011, 50(6): 408-411.
19. Lam SC, Lee DT, Yu DS. Establishing CUTOFF values for the Simplified Barthel Index in elderly adults in residential care homes. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2014, 62(3): 575-577.
20. 国家市场监督管理总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 功能障碍者生活自理能力评定方法: GB/T 37103－2018. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2018.
21. Gao Y, Wang Y, Li D, et al. Disability assessment in stroke: relationship among the pictorial-based Longshi Scale, the Barthel Index, and the modified Rankin Scale. Clin Rehabil, 2021, 35(4): 606-613.
22. 王玉龙, 李旭辉, 郭珊珊, 等. 反映肢体残疾人日常生活活动能力的主要指标筛选. 中国康复理论与实践, 2015, 21(11): 1333-1338.
23. Wang Y, Li S, Pan W, et al. Evaluation of the disability assessment Longshi scale: a multicenter study. J Int Med Res, 2020, 48(7): 300060520934299.
24. Zhou M, Liu X, Zha F, et al. Stroke outcome assessment: optimizing cutoff scores for the Longshi Scale, modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index. PLoS One, 2021, 16(5): e0251103.
25. Zhao J, Liu X, Wan L, et al. A novel Longshi Scale measured activity of daily living disability in elderly patients affected by neurological diseases: a multi-center cross-sectional study in China. BMC Geriatr, 2021, 21(1): 348.
26. Liu X, Zhou M, Zhao J, et al. Functional independence and disability evaluation in stroke patients: optimal cutoff scores for a pictorial-based Longshi Scale, Barthel Index, and Modified Rankin Scale. Front Neurol, 2022, 13: 710852.

Previous Article
Application of infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee block in analgesia after total knee arthroplasty

West China Medical Journal

Application of Longshi Ability of Daily Life scale in telerehabilitation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Format

Content