Objective  To compare the accuracy of different corneal curvature parameters used in toric intraocular lens (Toric IOL) implantation. Methods  Patients who underwent phacoemulsification combined with Toric IOL implantation at the Department of Ophthalmology, the People’s Hospital of Leshan between January and June 2022 were retrospectively included. The following data of all patients were collected: age, sex, axial length, anterior chamber depth, total keratometry (TK) and simulated keratometry (Simk, described as Simk1) measured by IOL Master 700 biometric instrument, total corneal refractive power (TCRP) measured by Pentacam AXL panoramic biometric instrument, Simk measured by iTrace visual function analyzer (described as Simk2), astigmatism of the operative eye, and the optometry (including spherical, cylindrical and axial degrees) of operative eyes three months after operation. According to the different corneal curvature parameters (TK, Simk1, TCRP and Simk2) used in the preoperative degree calculation of Toric IOL, patients were divided into four correspondent groups. By analyzing the differences and consistency in postoperative spherical equivalent, variation of postoperative spherical equivalent and postoperative residual astigmatism among the four groups, the accuracy of the four parameters for Toric IOL implantation was evaluated. Results  According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and after propensity score matching, a total of 47 patients (60 operated eyes) were included, with 15 eyes in each group. The spherical equivalent of the TK group, Simk1 group, TCRP group and Simk2 group after operation were (0.38±0.24), (0.49±0.15), (0.69±0.37) and (0.80±0.27) D, respectively. There was no significant difference between the Simk1 group and the TK group (P=0.52), but the differences between the TCRP group, Simk2 group and TK group were all statistically significant (P<0.01). The 95% consistency boundary width of the Simk1 group and the TK group was the narrowest (1.23). The variations of postoperative spherical equivalent of the four groups were (0.25±0.12), (0.39±0.19), (0.64±0.26) and (0.48±0.12) D, respectively. There was no significant difference between the Simk1 group and the TK group (P=0.11), but the differences between the TCRP group, Simk2 group and TK group were all statistically significant (P<0.01). The 95% consistency boundary width of the Simk2 groups and the TK group was the narrowest (0.64). The postoperative residual astigmatism of the four groups were (−0.33±0.12), (−0.57±0.11), (−0.73±0.18) and (−0.70±0.17) D, respectively. The differences between the last three groups and the TK group were statistically significant (P<0.01). The 95% consistency boundary width between the Simk1 group and the TK group was the narrowest (0.58). Conclusion  It is a reliable and effective method to use TK to reflect the total corneal curvature and calculate the degree of Toric IOL.

Copyright © the editorial department of West China Medical Journal of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved