ObjectiveTo contrastive the clinical results of intraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy and extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy in abdominal perineal resection. MethodsThe clinical data of 172 patients who underwent abdominal perineal resection from March 2010 to March 2014 were retrospectively analyzed.Sixty cases were performed the intraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy (intraperitoneal group), seventy-six cases were performed the extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy (extraperitoneal group), and thirty-six cases were performed the functional exercise after extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy (functional exercise group). The operation situation, postoperative complications, and colostomy function of three groups of patients were compared. Results①Operation situation: The colostomy location selection, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay of the three groups had no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05). The postoperative first exhaust and defecate time of the intraperitoneal group and the functional exercise group were obviously earlier than the extraperitoneal group, the difference had statistical significance (P < 0.05).②The postoperative complications: The postoperative complications rates of the extraperitoneal group and functional exercise group were lower than the intraperitoneal group, had statistically significant difference (P < 0.05), the functional exercise group was lower than the extraperitoneal group, the difference had statistical significance (P < 0.05).③The colostomy function:The patient' proportion that > 30 s of appeared time of defecation signals in the extraperitoneal group was significantly higher than the intraperitoneal group, and the functional exercise group was higher than that in the extraperitoneal group, the difference were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The patient' proportion that > 2 min of autonomous control of defecation to discharge feces time after the bowel signal appears in the extraperitoneal group was significantly higher than the intraperitoneal group, and the functional exercise group was higher than that in the extraperitoneal group, the difference were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conciusions The intraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy has less colostomy related complications than extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy in abdominal perineal resection. The control, and defecate ability are better. Postoperative function exercise can further reduce the colostomy complications and improve the function of colostomy.
Objective To compare the clinical effectiveness of different skin closure techniques in stoma reversal using network meta-analysis. Methods CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched until February 1, 2021, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes between different skin closure techniques were included. Data were processed using Stata MP16.0 and R 3.6.1. Results The results demonstrated that 16 RCTs (n=2 139) were eligible for pooling. Six types of skin closure techniques were used: linear closure, purse-string closure, gunsight closure, linear closure and drainage, purse-string closure and drainage, and linear closure and biological mesh. Network meta-analysis indicated that the incidence of postoperative infection with linear closure was higher than that with purse-string closure [RR=6.04, 95%CI (3.11, 16.89), P<0.0001], gunsight closure [RR=10.75, 95%CI (1.12, 152.12), P=0.04], and linear closure and drainage [RR=3.18, 95%CI (1.24, 10.20), P=0.03]. The purse-string closure was superior to linear closure and biological mesh [RR=0.15, 95%CI (0.01, 0.88), P=0.03] in reducing postoperative infection. The length of hospital stay after linear suture was longer than that after linear suture and drainage [MD=1.16, 95%CI (0.29, 2.20), P=0.02]. Conclusions This network meta-analysis suggests that purse-string closure and gunsight closure might be best for reducing postoperative infection, and the addition of drainage could not further reduce the incidence of postoperative infection. In addition, implantation of the biological mesh does not increase the risk of postoperative infection. However, a large-scale RCT is warranted to confirm the results.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of health education pathway intervention on self-care agency and health lifestyle promotion in colostomy patients. MethodsEighty-eight rectal cancer patients who had undergone colostomy were randomly divided into control group and intervention group (with 44 patients in each) between March 2012 and September 2013. The control group received conventional nursing only, while the intervention group were given health education pathway intervention besides conventional nursing. The self-care agency and health lifestyle promotion in the two groups under pre-colostomy state, one week after colostomy and two weeks after colostomy were surveyed and compared based on the exercise of self-care agency scale and the health promotion lifestyle profile. ResultsAfter health education pathway intervention, the scores of self-care agency and health lifestyle promotion in the intervention group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05), and the hospitalization expenditure was also obviously lower. Furthermore, the satisfaction degree on nursing service was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). ConclusionThe health education pathway intervention can greatly improve self-care agency and quality of life in rectal cancer patients who have undergone colostomy.
Objective To investigate factors for surgical difficulty and complications following closure of temporary ileostomy for rectal cancer. Methods The clinical data of 103 patients with low rectal cancer treated with closure of temporary ileostomy from January 2014 to July 2017 in the Northern Theater Command General Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The associated factors of surgical difficulty and postoperative complications were identified by the univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results In this study, there were 11 (10.7%) patients with surgical difficulty (operation time >100 min) in the 103 patients. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the history of previous abdominal surgery ［OR=5.272, 95% CI (1.325, 20.977), P=0.018］ and minimally invasive surgery ［OR=0.166, 95% CI (0.037, 0.758), P=0.020］ were the independent influencing factors of the difficulty of surgery. The complications following closure of temporary ileostomy included 16 (15.5%) patients with the incision infection, 5 (4.9%) patients with the intestinal obstruction, and 3 patients with the pulmonary infection (2.9%). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the diabetes ［OR=4.855, 95% CI (1.133, 20.804), P=0.033］, operation time >100 min ［OR=11.914, 95% CI (2.247, 63.171), P=0.004］, and peristomal dermatitis ［OR=18.814, 95% CI (3.978, 88.988), P<0.001］ were the independent influencing factors for the incision infection. Conclusions History of previous abdominal surgery is main cause for difficulty of surgery and minimally invasive surgery can reduce difficulty of surgery. Diabetes mellitus, longer operation time, and peristomal dermatitis are main causes of postoperative incision infection.
ObjectiveTo analyze risk factors of postoperative complications associated with reversal of defunctioning ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer undergoing sphincter preservation surgery. MethodData were collected retrospectively for consecutive patients undergoing defunctioning ileostomy following sphincter preservation surgery for rectal cancer, from January 2014 to December 2014. ResultsOne hundred and thirty patients were included (median time to reversal 132 d, range 39-692 d), of whom 35 patients (26.92%) had postoperative complications after stoma reversal. The main complications included 23 cases of diarrhea, 6 cases of bowel obstruction, 9 cases of incision infection, and 4 cases of perianal eczema. The results of univariate analysis showed that the distant of tumor from anal verge <5 cm (P=0.010), postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.002), and time to reversal (P=0.025) were related to the postoperative complications associated with reversal of defunctioning ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer undergoing sphincter preservation surgery. The result of multivariate analysis by using a logistic regression model showed that the time to reversal (OR=1.006, P=0.021) was a significant independent risk factor for it. ConclusionDelay reversal of defunctiong ileostomy might increase risk of postoperative complications associated with reversal of defunctioning ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer undergoing sphincter preservation surgery.
ObjectiveTo explore the causes of colon-anal anastomotic stenosis in patients with low rectal cancer after prophylactic ileostomy under complete laparoscopy. MethodsA total of 194 patients with low rectal cancer who received complete laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer combined with preventive ileostomy in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2020 were selected as the study objects, and were divided into non-stenosis group (n=136) and stenosis group (n=58) according to postoperative colon-anal anastomosis stenosis. The clinical data of the two groups were compared. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the factors affecting postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis, and stepwise regression was used to evaluate the importance of each factor. The risk prediction model of postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis was constructed and evaluated. ResultsIn the stenosis group, the proportion of males, tumor diameter ＞3 cm, NRS2002 score >3 points, manual anastomosis, left colic artery not preserved, anastomotic leakage, pelvic infection and patients undergoing neoadjuvant radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were higher than those in the non-stenosis group (P<0.05). The results of univariate logistic analysis showed that female and preserving the left colonic artery were the protective factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05), and the tumor diameter >3 cm, NRS2002 score >3 points, manual anastomosis, anastomotic leakage, pelvic infection, neoadjuvant radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were the risk factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender, tumor diameter, NRS 2002 score, anastomotic mode, anastomotic leakage, and pelvic infection were independent influencing factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05). Stepwise regression analysis showed that the top three factors affecting postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis were NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic leakage. Multivariate Cox risk proportional model analysis showed that the multivariate model composed of NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic leakage had a good consistency in the risk assessment of postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis. Based on this, a risk prediction model for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis was constructed. The results of strong influence point analysis show that there are no data points in the modeling data that have a strong influence on the model parameter estimation (Cook distance <1). Receiver operating characteristic curve results showed that the model had good differentiation ability, the area under curve was 0.917, 95%CI was (0.891, 0.942). The calibration curve was approximately a diagonal line, showing that the model has good predictive power (Brier value was 0.097). The results of the clinical decision curve showed that better clinical benefits can be obtained by using the predictive model to identify the corresponding risk population and implement clinical intervention. ConclusionThe prediction model based on NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic fistula can effectively evaluate the risk of colon-anal anastomotic stenosis after preventive ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer under complete laparoscopy.